SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Vulnerable Nations at Copenhagen Summit Reject 2C Target
Alliance of Small Island States say any deal that allows temperatures to rise by more than 1.5C is 'not negotiable'
Dec 10, 2009
More than half the world's countries say they are determined not to
sign up to any deal that allows temperatures to rise by more than 1.5C
- as opposed to 2C, which the major economies would prefer.
But
any agreement to reach that target would require massive and rapid cuts
in greenhouse gas emissions combined with removal of CO2 in the
atmosphere. An extra 0.5C drop in temperatures would require vastly
deeper cuts in carbon dioxide and up to $10.5 trillion (PS6.5tr) extra
in energy-related investment by 2030, according to the International
Energy Agency.
Holding temperatures to an increase of 1.5C
compared to preindustrial levels would mean stabilising carbon
concentrations in the atmosphere at roughly 350 parts per million
(ppm), down from a present 387ppm. No technology currently exists to
feasibly remove CO2 from the atmosphere on a large scale.
The temperature issue was starkly highlighted yesterday when Tuvalu, one of the world's most climate-threatened countries, formally proposed that countries sign up to a new, strengthened and legally binding agreement
that would set more ambitious targets than what is presently being
proposed. This divided G77 countries, some of whom led by China and
India argued against it, fearing that it would replace the Kyoto
protocol.
But they were supported by many of the
vulnerable countries, from sub-Saharan Africa as well as the small
island states, with passionate and powerful statements about the
catastrophic impact of climate change on their people.
"Tuvalu
has taken a strong stand to put the focus back on their bottom line.
Nothing but a legally binding deal will deliver the strong commitments
to urgent action that are needed to avoid catastrophe, especially to
the most vulnerable countries and people," said the Oxfam spokesman
Barry Coates.
Today the Alliance of Small Island States
(Aosis), a grouping of 43 of the smallest and most vulnerable
countries, including Tuvalu, said any rise of more than 1.5C was not
negotiable at Copenhagen. They are backed by 48 of the least developed
nations.
But the UN conference chief, Yvo de Boer,
implied this morning that the proposal had little chance of being
adopted. "It is theoretically possible that the conference will agree
to hold temperatures to 1.5C but most industrialised countries have
pinned their hopes on 2C," he said.
The 2C figure, which was included in the leaked draft negotiating text
prepared by the summits host Denmark has emerged as the figure favoured
by large economies and the likeliest to be adopted. But the poorest
countries say that latest science implies that a 2C warming would lead
to disastrous consequences - for example from sea level rise.
"We
have two research stations, one in the Pacific and one in the
Caribbean. They both suggest a rise of 2C is completely untenable for
us," said Dessima Williams, a Grenadian diplomat speaking for Aosis.
"Our
islands are disappearing, our coral reefs are bleaching, we are losing
our fish supplies. We bring empirical evidence to Copenhagen of what
climate change is doing now to our states," she said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
More than half the world's countries say they are determined not to
sign up to any deal that allows temperatures to rise by more than 1.5C
- as opposed to 2C, which the major economies would prefer.
But
any agreement to reach that target would require massive and rapid cuts
in greenhouse gas emissions combined with removal of CO2 in the
atmosphere. An extra 0.5C drop in temperatures would require vastly
deeper cuts in carbon dioxide and up to $10.5 trillion (PS6.5tr) extra
in energy-related investment by 2030, according to the International
Energy Agency.
Holding temperatures to an increase of 1.5C
compared to preindustrial levels would mean stabilising carbon
concentrations in the atmosphere at roughly 350 parts per million
(ppm), down from a present 387ppm. No technology currently exists to
feasibly remove CO2 from the atmosphere on a large scale.
The temperature issue was starkly highlighted yesterday when Tuvalu, one of the world's most climate-threatened countries, formally proposed that countries sign up to a new, strengthened and legally binding agreement
that would set more ambitious targets than what is presently being
proposed. This divided G77 countries, some of whom led by China and
India argued against it, fearing that it would replace the Kyoto
protocol.
But they were supported by many of the
vulnerable countries, from sub-Saharan Africa as well as the small
island states, with passionate and powerful statements about the
catastrophic impact of climate change on their people.
"Tuvalu
has taken a strong stand to put the focus back on their bottom line.
Nothing but a legally binding deal will deliver the strong commitments
to urgent action that are needed to avoid catastrophe, especially to
the most vulnerable countries and people," said the Oxfam spokesman
Barry Coates.
Today the Alliance of Small Island States
(Aosis), a grouping of 43 of the smallest and most vulnerable
countries, including Tuvalu, said any rise of more than 1.5C was not
negotiable at Copenhagen. They are backed by 48 of the least developed
nations.
But the UN conference chief, Yvo de Boer,
implied this morning that the proposal had little chance of being
adopted. "It is theoretically possible that the conference will agree
to hold temperatures to 1.5C but most industrialised countries have
pinned their hopes on 2C," he said.
The 2C figure, which was included in the leaked draft negotiating text
prepared by the summits host Denmark has emerged as the figure favoured
by large economies and the likeliest to be adopted. But the poorest
countries say that latest science implies that a 2C warming would lead
to disastrous consequences - for example from sea level rise.
"We
have two research stations, one in the Pacific and one in the
Caribbean. They both suggest a rise of 2C is completely untenable for
us," said Dessima Williams, a Grenadian diplomat speaking for Aosis.
"Our
islands are disappearing, our coral reefs are bleaching, we are losing
our fish supplies. We bring empirical evidence to Copenhagen of what
climate change is doing now to our states," she said.
More than half the world's countries say they are determined not to
sign up to any deal that allows temperatures to rise by more than 1.5C
- as opposed to 2C, which the major economies would prefer.
But
any agreement to reach that target would require massive and rapid cuts
in greenhouse gas emissions combined with removal of CO2 in the
atmosphere. An extra 0.5C drop in temperatures would require vastly
deeper cuts in carbon dioxide and up to $10.5 trillion (PS6.5tr) extra
in energy-related investment by 2030, according to the International
Energy Agency.
Holding temperatures to an increase of 1.5C
compared to preindustrial levels would mean stabilising carbon
concentrations in the atmosphere at roughly 350 parts per million
(ppm), down from a present 387ppm. No technology currently exists to
feasibly remove CO2 from the atmosphere on a large scale.
The temperature issue was starkly highlighted yesterday when Tuvalu, one of the world's most climate-threatened countries, formally proposed that countries sign up to a new, strengthened and legally binding agreement
that would set more ambitious targets than what is presently being
proposed. This divided G77 countries, some of whom led by China and
India argued against it, fearing that it would replace the Kyoto
protocol.
But they were supported by many of the
vulnerable countries, from sub-Saharan Africa as well as the small
island states, with passionate and powerful statements about the
catastrophic impact of climate change on their people.
"Tuvalu
has taken a strong stand to put the focus back on their bottom line.
Nothing but a legally binding deal will deliver the strong commitments
to urgent action that are needed to avoid catastrophe, especially to
the most vulnerable countries and people," said the Oxfam spokesman
Barry Coates.
Today the Alliance of Small Island States
(Aosis), a grouping of 43 of the smallest and most vulnerable
countries, including Tuvalu, said any rise of more than 1.5C was not
negotiable at Copenhagen. They are backed by 48 of the least developed
nations.
But the UN conference chief, Yvo de Boer,
implied this morning that the proposal had little chance of being
adopted. "It is theoretically possible that the conference will agree
to hold temperatures to 1.5C but most industrialised countries have
pinned their hopes on 2C," he said.
The 2C figure, which was included in the leaked draft negotiating text
prepared by the summits host Denmark has emerged as the figure favoured
by large economies and the likeliest to be adopted. But the poorest
countries say that latest science implies that a 2C warming would lead
to disastrous consequences - for example from sea level rise.
"We
have two research stations, one in the Pacific and one in the
Caribbean. They both suggest a rise of 2C is completely untenable for
us," said Dessima Williams, a Grenadian diplomat speaking for Aosis.
"Our
islands are disappearing, our coral reefs are bleaching, we are losing
our fish supplies. We bring empirical evidence to Copenhagen of what
climate change is doing now to our states," she said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.