Five of the 'Kingsnorth Six' at the top of the 200m chimney. (Courtesy: Greenpeace.org)
Oct 07, 2009
E.ON, the energy group, tonight effectively threw in the towel on its plans to build a new coal-power station at Kingsnorth, blaming the recession.
In
a heavy blow to the government's plans to promote energy from coal,
E.ON said lower demands for electricity due to the recession had pushed
the need for the new plant in the UK to around 2016.
The company
said, however, that it remained committed to the development of cleaner
coal and carbon capture and storage "which we believe have a key role
to play alongside renewables, gas and nuclear in tackling the global
threat of climate change while ensuring affordability and security of energy supplies".
While
the company described the decision as a postponement, the announcement
effectively scuppers the whole project, green groups said.
Kingsnorth
has been shrouded in controversy ever since inception, with protests
over several years including a high-profile Climate Camp protest.
Six
Greenpeace protesters who climbed the smokestack at the plant were
later acquitted after the jury accepted the plant posed a greater
threat than the activities of the activists.
Environmentalists hailed the decision as a victory against dirty coal.
"This
development is extremely good news for the climate and in a stroke
significantly reduces the chances of an unabated Kingsnorth plant ever
being built," said Greenpeace executive director John Sauven.
"The
case for new coal is crumbling, with even E.ON now accepting it's not
currently economic to build new plants. The huge diverse coalition of
people who have campaigned against Kingsnorth because of the threat it
posed to the climate should take heart that emissions from new coal are
now even less likely in Britain."
He added: "Ed Miliband [the
environment secretary] now has a golden opportunity to rule out all
emissions from new coal as a sign of Britain's leadership before the
key Copenhagen climate meeting. With E.ON's announcement he's now got
an open goal."
E.ON insisted that the Kingsnorth project was not dead and its decision stemmed from specific economic decisions.
"Kingsnorth
is not dead at all," said Jonathan Smith, an E.ON spokesman. "The
application was made in 2006 and no one could have foreseen the fall in
demand and the drop in wholesale prices. Demand has fallen so much
because of the recession that there is no need for a new plant."
E.ON also pointed out that it has yet to receive government permission to go ahead with the project.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
E.ON, the energy group, tonight effectively threw in the towel on its plans to build a new coal-power station at Kingsnorth, blaming the recession.
In
a heavy blow to the government's plans to promote energy from coal,
E.ON said lower demands for electricity due to the recession had pushed
the need for the new plant in the UK to around 2016.
The company
said, however, that it remained committed to the development of cleaner
coal and carbon capture and storage "which we believe have a key role
to play alongside renewables, gas and nuclear in tackling the global
threat of climate change while ensuring affordability and security of energy supplies".
While
the company described the decision as a postponement, the announcement
effectively scuppers the whole project, green groups said.
Kingsnorth
has been shrouded in controversy ever since inception, with protests
over several years including a high-profile Climate Camp protest.
Six
Greenpeace protesters who climbed the smokestack at the plant were
later acquitted after the jury accepted the plant posed a greater
threat than the activities of the activists.
Environmentalists hailed the decision as a victory against dirty coal.
"This
development is extremely good news for the climate and in a stroke
significantly reduces the chances of an unabated Kingsnorth plant ever
being built," said Greenpeace executive director John Sauven.
"The
case for new coal is crumbling, with even E.ON now accepting it's not
currently economic to build new plants. The huge diverse coalition of
people who have campaigned against Kingsnorth because of the threat it
posed to the climate should take heart that emissions from new coal are
now even less likely in Britain."
He added: "Ed Miliband [the
environment secretary] now has a golden opportunity to rule out all
emissions from new coal as a sign of Britain's leadership before the
key Copenhagen climate meeting. With E.ON's announcement he's now got
an open goal."
E.ON insisted that the Kingsnorth project was not dead and its decision stemmed from specific economic decisions.
"Kingsnorth
is not dead at all," said Jonathan Smith, an E.ON spokesman. "The
application was made in 2006 and no one could have foreseen the fall in
demand and the drop in wholesale prices. Demand has fallen so much
because of the recession that there is no need for a new plant."
E.ON also pointed out that it has yet to receive government permission to go ahead with the project.
E.ON, the energy group, tonight effectively threw in the towel on its plans to build a new coal-power station at Kingsnorth, blaming the recession.
In
a heavy blow to the government's plans to promote energy from coal,
E.ON said lower demands for electricity due to the recession had pushed
the need for the new plant in the UK to around 2016.
The company
said, however, that it remained committed to the development of cleaner
coal and carbon capture and storage "which we believe have a key role
to play alongside renewables, gas and nuclear in tackling the global
threat of climate change while ensuring affordability and security of energy supplies".
While
the company described the decision as a postponement, the announcement
effectively scuppers the whole project, green groups said.
Kingsnorth
has been shrouded in controversy ever since inception, with protests
over several years including a high-profile Climate Camp protest.
Six
Greenpeace protesters who climbed the smokestack at the plant were
later acquitted after the jury accepted the plant posed a greater
threat than the activities of the activists.
Environmentalists hailed the decision as a victory against dirty coal.
"This
development is extremely good news for the climate and in a stroke
significantly reduces the chances of an unabated Kingsnorth plant ever
being built," said Greenpeace executive director John Sauven.
"The
case for new coal is crumbling, with even E.ON now accepting it's not
currently economic to build new plants. The huge diverse coalition of
people who have campaigned against Kingsnorth because of the threat it
posed to the climate should take heart that emissions from new coal are
now even less likely in Britain."
He added: "Ed Miliband [the
environment secretary] now has a golden opportunity to rule out all
emissions from new coal as a sign of Britain's leadership before the
key Copenhagen climate meeting. With E.ON's announcement he's now got
an open goal."
E.ON insisted that the Kingsnorth project was not dead and its decision stemmed from specific economic decisions.
"Kingsnorth
is not dead at all," said Jonathan Smith, an E.ON spokesman. "The
application was made in 2006 and no one could have foreseen the fall in
demand and the drop in wholesale prices. Demand has fallen so much
because of the recession that there is no need for a new plant."
E.ON also pointed out that it has yet to receive government permission to go ahead with the project.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.