SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Senate Backs $700 billion Bail-Out Plan
Emergency rescue plan passed after six-hour debate by 74 to 25 and will now go back to House of Representatives
Oct 02, 2008
The US Senate voted comfortably in favour of the Bush
administration's contentious $700bn bail-out of the banking industry
early this morning, bringing the package back to life after a bitter
week of political wrangling and wild gyrations in financial markets.
After
a six-hour debate, the emergency rescue plan was passed by 74 to 25.
The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, said: "I'm very, very happy.
This is a good vote."
The bill is expected to go back to the
House of Representatives tomorrow, where Republican and Democratic
leaders hope to reverse Monday's shock vote against its progress.
The upper chamber's approval will come as a relief to George Bush
whose authority has been severely tested by Congress's rebellion. Global financial markets have been volatile throughout the week and financial institutions have been struggling to stay afloat on both sides of the Atlantic.
The two candidates vying for the US presidency, Barack Obama and John McCain, both broke off the campaign trail to cast their first votes in the chamber for months.
"This plan is not perfect. Democrats and Republicans
in Congress have legitimate concerns about it," Obama told his fellow
senators. "But it's clear from my perspective that this is what we have
to do right now to prevent the possibility of a crisis turning into a
catastrophe."
Since it was rejected by the House earlier in the
week, the plan has been sweetened with measures to appease doubters.
The core proposal still authorises the treasury to spend billions of
dollars cleaning up the balance sheets of struggling banks by buying up
moribund mortgage-related securities. But it has grown from its
original three pages to 451 pages.
In its new form, the plan will
increase protection for US bank customers by raising the limit of a
federal guarantee on deposit accounts from $100,000 to $250,000.
Another
amendment extends energy-related tax breaks for businesses - a measure
intended to win over Republican free-market critics but which has
rankled some on the left who see it as a nod to commerce rather than to
struggling homeowners.
There are still staunch hold-outs in both
parties. Bill Nelson, a Democratic senator from Florida, argued that it
hardly does anything to help those facing foreclosure on predatory
sub-prime mortgages.
"This bill sends a message to Wall Street
that if you play fast and loose in the name of short-term profits, the
government will make up your losses," said Nelson.
But Lindsay
Graham, a Republican, argued that the alternative was to allow credit
to become so expensive that "Americans are not going to be able to
borrow a dime". He said: "If you think this costs a lot now, just do
nothing and then see what it costs."
Many Congressional figures
say they have detected a change in the mood of constituents towards
grudging acceptance of the bailout, partly prompted by this week's
plunge in Wall Street stock prices. A long-time critic of the plan,
Republican senator Joe Barton of Texas, said the balance of calls to
his office from voters had shifted from 60-40 opposed to the package to
70-30 in favour of it.
A glut of dismal economic statistics has
given fresh impetus for action. New data yesterday showed a slump in
manufacturing activity, a dive in car sales and soaring job losses.
The world's richest man, Warren Buffett, has likened the situation to an "economic Pearl Harbour".
Some 14 high-street banks in the US have already gone bust this year
and investment houses Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns have fallen
victim to the crisis.
But on the streets outside Congress, noisy protesters demonstrated against the bailout. Jobs With Justice,
a workers' rights group, held rallies outside Washington branches of
Bank of America and Citibank. Sarcastically dubbing themselves
"billionaires for the bailout", they chanted: "We broke it, you fix it."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The US Senate voted comfortably in favour of the Bush
administration's contentious $700bn bail-out of the banking industry
early this morning, bringing the package back to life after a bitter
week of political wrangling and wild gyrations in financial markets.
After
a six-hour debate, the emergency rescue plan was passed by 74 to 25.
The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, said: "I'm very, very happy.
This is a good vote."
The bill is expected to go back to the
House of Representatives tomorrow, where Republican and Democratic
leaders hope to reverse Monday's shock vote against its progress.
The upper chamber's approval will come as a relief to George Bush
whose authority has been severely tested by Congress's rebellion. Global financial markets have been volatile throughout the week and financial institutions have been struggling to stay afloat on both sides of the Atlantic.
The two candidates vying for the US presidency, Barack Obama and John McCain, both broke off the campaign trail to cast their first votes in the chamber for months.
"This plan is not perfect. Democrats and Republicans
in Congress have legitimate concerns about it," Obama told his fellow
senators. "But it's clear from my perspective that this is what we have
to do right now to prevent the possibility of a crisis turning into a
catastrophe."
Since it was rejected by the House earlier in the
week, the plan has been sweetened with measures to appease doubters.
The core proposal still authorises the treasury to spend billions of
dollars cleaning up the balance sheets of struggling banks by buying up
moribund mortgage-related securities. But it has grown from its
original three pages to 451 pages.
In its new form, the plan will
increase protection for US bank customers by raising the limit of a
federal guarantee on deposit accounts from $100,000 to $250,000.
Another
amendment extends energy-related tax breaks for businesses - a measure
intended to win over Republican free-market critics but which has
rankled some on the left who see it as a nod to commerce rather than to
struggling homeowners.
There are still staunch hold-outs in both
parties. Bill Nelson, a Democratic senator from Florida, argued that it
hardly does anything to help those facing foreclosure on predatory
sub-prime mortgages.
"This bill sends a message to Wall Street
that if you play fast and loose in the name of short-term profits, the
government will make up your losses," said Nelson.
But Lindsay
Graham, a Republican, argued that the alternative was to allow credit
to become so expensive that "Americans are not going to be able to
borrow a dime". He said: "If you think this costs a lot now, just do
nothing and then see what it costs."
Many Congressional figures
say they have detected a change in the mood of constituents towards
grudging acceptance of the bailout, partly prompted by this week's
plunge in Wall Street stock prices. A long-time critic of the plan,
Republican senator Joe Barton of Texas, said the balance of calls to
his office from voters had shifted from 60-40 opposed to the package to
70-30 in favour of it.
A glut of dismal economic statistics has
given fresh impetus for action. New data yesterday showed a slump in
manufacturing activity, a dive in car sales and soaring job losses.
The world's richest man, Warren Buffett, has likened the situation to an "economic Pearl Harbour".
Some 14 high-street banks in the US have already gone bust this year
and investment houses Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns have fallen
victim to the crisis.
But on the streets outside Congress, noisy protesters demonstrated against the bailout. Jobs With Justice,
a workers' rights group, held rallies outside Washington branches of
Bank of America and Citibank. Sarcastically dubbing themselves
"billionaires for the bailout", they chanted: "We broke it, you fix it."
The US Senate voted comfortably in favour of the Bush
administration's contentious $700bn bail-out of the banking industry
early this morning, bringing the package back to life after a bitter
week of political wrangling and wild gyrations in financial markets.
After
a six-hour debate, the emergency rescue plan was passed by 74 to 25.
The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, said: "I'm very, very happy.
This is a good vote."
The bill is expected to go back to the
House of Representatives tomorrow, where Republican and Democratic
leaders hope to reverse Monday's shock vote against its progress.
The upper chamber's approval will come as a relief to George Bush
whose authority has been severely tested by Congress's rebellion. Global financial markets have been volatile throughout the week and financial institutions have been struggling to stay afloat on both sides of the Atlantic.
The two candidates vying for the US presidency, Barack Obama and John McCain, both broke off the campaign trail to cast their first votes in the chamber for months.
"This plan is not perfect. Democrats and Republicans
in Congress have legitimate concerns about it," Obama told his fellow
senators. "But it's clear from my perspective that this is what we have
to do right now to prevent the possibility of a crisis turning into a
catastrophe."
Since it was rejected by the House earlier in the
week, the plan has been sweetened with measures to appease doubters.
The core proposal still authorises the treasury to spend billions of
dollars cleaning up the balance sheets of struggling banks by buying up
moribund mortgage-related securities. But it has grown from its
original three pages to 451 pages.
In its new form, the plan will
increase protection for US bank customers by raising the limit of a
federal guarantee on deposit accounts from $100,000 to $250,000.
Another
amendment extends energy-related tax breaks for businesses - a measure
intended to win over Republican free-market critics but which has
rankled some on the left who see it as a nod to commerce rather than to
struggling homeowners.
There are still staunch hold-outs in both
parties. Bill Nelson, a Democratic senator from Florida, argued that it
hardly does anything to help those facing foreclosure on predatory
sub-prime mortgages.
"This bill sends a message to Wall Street
that if you play fast and loose in the name of short-term profits, the
government will make up your losses," said Nelson.
But Lindsay
Graham, a Republican, argued that the alternative was to allow credit
to become so expensive that "Americans are not going to be able to
borrow a dime". He said: "If you think this costs a lot now, just do
nothing and then see what it costs."
Many Congressional figures
say they have detected a change in the mood of constituents towards
grudging acceptance of the bailout, partly prompted by this week's
plunge in Wall Street stock prices. A long-time critic of the plan,
Republican senator Joe Barton of Texas, said the balance of calls to
his office from voters had shifted from 60-40 opposed to the package to
70-30 in favour of it.
A glut of dismal economic statistics has
given fresh impetus for action. New data yesterday showed a slump in
manufacturing activity, a dive in car sales and soaring job losses.
The world's richest man, Warren Buffett, has likened the situation to an "economic Pearl Harbour".
Some 14 high-street banks in the US have already gone bust this year
and investment houses Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns have fallen
victim to the crisis.
But on the streets outside Congress, noisy protesters demonstrated against the bailout. Jobs With Justice,
a workers' rights group, held rallies outside Washington branches of
Bank of America and Citibank. Sarcastically dubbing themselves
"billionaires for the bailout", they chanted: "We broke it, you fix it."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.