SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Big Oil Sets Up Crude Export Lobby Group
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
Oct 27, 2014
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
The group was formed just days after the US Government Accountability Office recommended against lifting the ban and warned that greenhouse gas emissions would rise if the ban was lifted.
It is important to remember what the GAO said last week in its report. It argued that "additional crude oil production may pose risks to the quality and quantity of surface groundwater sources; increase greenhouse gas and other emissions; and increase the risk of spills from crude oil transportation."
According to its lobbying disclosure form, PACE is being run out of the Washington office of law firm Williams & Jensen, which describes itself on its website as "Washington's lobbying powerhouse".
The lobbying disclosure form, obtained by Greenwire, shows the coalition is seeking a "repeal of the 1970s-era prohibition on American crude oil exports as warranted by the numerous economic and consumer benefits derived from our country's abundance of domestic oil supplies."
George Baker, the lobbyist hired to lead the group argues that "More than anything else, the formation of PACE reflects growing public awareness of the need to align policies in Washington with the economic opportunities made possible by America's oil abundance."
In outlining the supposed "benefits" of lifting the ban PACE is ignoring the GAO report, and trying to spin the benefits of lifting the ban. That is not surprising given PACE's membership includes Marathon Oil, Anadarko Petroleum, Encana Oil and Gas, Concho Resources, Laredo Petroleum, Hess Corp, Noble Energy, Pioneer Natural Resources, Chesapeake Energy Corp, Devon Energy Corp, EOG Resources, Continental Resources, Occidental Petroleum Corp and ConocoPhillips.
Daren Beaudo, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips told Reuters that the 14 producers had "united to create an advocacy initiative to help repeal the outdated ban on crude oil exports."
The ability to export crude is "vital to the country's economic growth and national security, job creation, and strengthening our competitive position in the global marketplace," he added.
If Beaudo is worried about national security, maybe he should read the Pentagon's latest Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap, which begins by saying "Climate change will affect the Department of Defense's ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks."
Also cited: Nick Juliano, "Independent producers launch coalition to push for exports", Greenwire, 24 October 2014
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
The group was formed just days after the US Government Accountability Office recommended against lifting the ban and warned that greenhouse gas emissions would rise if the ban was lifted.
It is important to remember what the GAO said last week in its report. It argued that "additional crude oil production may pose risks to the quality and quantity of surface groundwater sources; increase greenhouse gas and other emissions; and increase the risk of spills from crude oil transportation."
According to its lobbying disclosure form, PACE is being run out of the Washington office of law firm Williams & Jensen, which describes itself on its website as "Washington's lobbying powerhouse".
The lobbying disclosure form, obtained by Greenwire, shows the coalition is seeking a "repeal of the 1970s-era prohibition on American crude oil exports as warranted by the numerous economic and consumer benefits derived from our country's abundance of domestic oil supplies."
George Baker, the lobbyist hired to lead the group argues that "More than anything else, the formation of PACE reflects growing public awareness of the need to align policies in Washington with the economic opportunities made possible by America's oil abundance."
In outlining the supposed "benefits" of lifting the ban PACE is ignoring the GAO report, and trying to spin the benefits of lifting the ban. That is not surprising given PACE's membership includes Marathon Oil, Anadarko Petroleum, Encana Oil and Gas, Concho Resources, Laredo Petroleum, Hess Corp, Noble Energy, Pioneer Natural Resources, Chesapeake Energy Corp, Devon Energy Corp, EOG Resources, Continental Resources, Occidental Petroleum Corp and ConocoPhillips.
Daren Beaudo, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips told Reuters that the 14 producers had "united to create an advocacy initiative to help repeal the outdated ban on crude oil exports."
The ability to export crude is "vital to the country's economic growth and national security, job creation, and strengthening our competitive position in the global marketplace," he added.
If Beaudo is worried about national security, maybe he should read the Pentagon's latest Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap, which begins by saying "Climate change will affect the Department of Defense's ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks."
Also cited: Nick Juliano, "Independent producers launch coalition to push for exports", Greenwire, 24 October 2014
Andy Rowell
Andy Rowell is a staff blogger for Oil Change International in addition to working as a freelance writer and investigative journalist who specializes in environmental, health and lobbying issues. He is a senior Research Fellow at the University of Bath and Director of the Tobacco Tactics team at the Tobacco Control Research Group, which is a partner in the global tobacco industry watchdog, STOP.
The growing political fight over relaxing America's decades-old crude export ban intensified at the end of last week, when 14 oil and gas firms set up a lobbying group specifically to push to relax the ban.
The group, entitled Producers for American Crude Oil Exports (PACE), is the first lobby group to be formed to purely lobby to overturn the ban.
It is the latest example of a decades-long strategy by the oil industry to form front groups to push for its own political or economic ends.
The group was formed just days after the US Government Accountability Office recommended against lifting the ban and warned that greenhouse gas emissions would rise if the ban was lifted.
It is important to remember what the GAO said last week in its report. It argued that "additional crude oil production may pose risks to the quality and quantity of surface groundwater sources; increase greenhouse gas and other emissions; and increase the risk of spills from crude oil transportation."
According to its lobbying disclosure form, PACE is being run out of the Washington office of law firm Williams & Jensen, which describes itself on its website as "Washington's lobbying powerhouse".
The lobbying disclosure form, obtained by Greenwire, shows the coalition is seeking a "repeal of the 1970s-era prohibition on American crude oil exports as warranted by the numerous economic and consumer benefits derived from our country's abundance of domestic oil supplies."
George Baker, the lobbyist hired to lead the group argues that "More than anything else, the formation of PACE reflects growing public awareness of the need to align policies in Washington with the economic opportunities made possible by America's oil abundance."
In outlining the supposed "benefits" of lifting the ban PACE is ignoring the GAO report, and trying to spin the benefits of lifting the ban. That is not surprising given PACE's membership includes Marathon Oil, Anadarko Petroleum, Encana Oil and Gas, Concho Resources, Laredo Petroleum, Hess Corp, Noble Energy, Pioneer Natural Resources, Chesapeake Energy Corp, Devon Energy Corp, EOG Resources, Continental Resources, Occidental Petroleum Corp and ConocoPhillips.
Daren Beaudo, a spokesman for ConocoPhillips told Reuters that the 14 producers had "united to create an advocacy initiative to help repeal the outdated ban on crude oil exports."
The ability to export crude is "vital to the country's economic growth and national security, job creation, and strengthening our competitive position in the global marketplace," he added.
If Beaudo is worried about national security, maybe he should read the Pentagon's latest Climate Change Adaptation Roadmap, which begins by saying "Climate change will affect the Department of Defense's ability to defend the Nation and poses immediate risks."
Also cited: Nick Juliano, "Independent producers launch coalition to push for exports", Greenwire, 24 October 2014
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.