

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Looking back at President Obama's first year in office, The Nation
asked members of its community to give their assesment of his performance. You can share your take on Obama's highest and lowest moments in the
form provided here. Here is historian Howard Zinn's response:
I've been searching hard for a highlight. The only thing that comes
close is some of Obama's rhetoric; I don't see any kind of a highlight
in his actions and policies.
As far as disappointments, I wasn't terribly disappointed because I
didn't expect that much. I expected him to be a traditional Democratic
president. On foreign policy, that's hardly any different from a
Republican--as nationalist, expansionist, imperial and warlike. So in
that sense, there's no expectation and no disappointment. On domestic
policy, traditionally Democratic presidents are more reformist, closer
to the labor movement, more willing to pass legislation on behalf of
ordinary people--and that's been true of Obama. But Democratic reforms
have also been limited, cautious. Obama's no exception. On healthcare,
for example, he starts out with a compromise, and when you start out
with a compromise, you end with a compromise of a compromise, which is
where we are now.
I thought that in the area of constitutional rights he would be better
than he has been. That's the greatest disappointment, because Obama went
to Harvard Law School and is presumably dedicated to constitutional
rights. But he becomes president, and he's not making any significant
step away from Bush policies. Sure, he keeps talking about closing
Guantanamo, but he still treats the prisoners there as "suspected
terrorists." They have not been tried and have not been found guilty. So
when Obama proposes taking people out of Guantanamo and putting
them into other prisons, he's not advancing the cause of constitutional
rights very far. And then he's gone into court arguing for preventive
detention, and he's continued the policy of sending suspects to
countries where they very well may be tortured.
I think people are dazzled by Obama's rhetoric, and that people ought to
begin to understand that Obama is going to be a mediocre
president--which means, in our time, a dangerous president--unless there
is some national movement to push him in a better direction.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Looking back at President Obama's first year in office, The Nation
asked members of its community to give their assesment of his performance. You can share your take on Obama's highest and lowest moments in the
form provided here. Here is historian Howard Zinn's response:
I've been searching hard for a highlight. The only thing that comes
close is some of Obama's rhetoric; I don't see any kind of a highlight
in his actions and policies.
As far as disappointments, I wasn't terribly disappointed because I
didn't expect that much. I expected him to be a traditional Democratic
president. On foreign policy, that's hardly any different from a
Republican--as nationalist, expansionist, imperial and warlike. So in
that sense, there's no expectation and no disappointment. On domestic
policy, traditionally Democratic presidents are more reformist, closer
to the labor movement, more willing to pass legislation on behalf of
ordinary people--and that's been true of Obama. But Democratic reforms
have also been limited, cautious. Obama's no exception. On healthcare,
for example, he starts out with a compromise, and when you start out
with a compromise, you end with a compromise of a compromise, which is
where we are now.
I thought that in the area of constitutional rights he would be better
than he has been. That's the greatest disappointment, because Obama went
to Harvard Law School and is presumably dedicated to constitutional
rights. But he becomes president, and he's not making any significant
step away from Bush policies. Sure, he keeps talking about closing
Guantanamo, but he still treats the prisoners there as "suspected
terrorists." They have not been tried and have not been found guilty. So
when Obama proposes taking people out of Guantanamo and putting
them into other prisons, he's not advancing the cause of constitutional
rights very far. And then he's gone into court arguing for preventive
detention, and he's continued the policy of sending suspects to
countries where they very well may be tortured.
I think people are dazzled by Obama's rhetoric, and that people ought to
begin to understand that Obama is going to be a mediocre
president--which means, in our time, a dangerous president--unless there
is some national movement to push him in a better direction.
Looking back at President Obama's first year in office, The Nation
asked members of its community to give their assesment of his performance. You can share your take on Obama's highest and lowest moments in the
form provided here. Here is historian Howard Zinn's response:
I've been searching hard for a highlight. The only thing that comes
close is some of Obama's rhetoric; I don't see any kind of a highlight
in his actions and policies.
As far as disappointments, I wasn't terribly disappointed because I
didn't expect that much. I expected him to be a traditional Democratic
president. On foreign policy, that's hardly any different from a
Republican--as nationalist, expansionist, imperial and warlike. So in
that sense, there's no expectation and no disappointment. On domestic
policy, traditionally Democratic presidents are more reformist, closer
to the labor movement, more willing to pass legislation on behalf of
ordinary people--and that's been true of Obama. But Democratic reforms
have also been limited, cautious. Obama's no exception. On healthcare,
for example, he starts out with a compromise, and when you start out
with a compromise, you end with a compromise of a compromise, which is
where we are now.
I thought that in the area of constitutional rights he would be better
than he has been. That's the greatest disappointment, because Obama went
to Harvard Law School and is presumably dedicated to constitutional
rights. But he becomes president, and he's not making any significant
step away from Bush policies. Sure, he keeps talking about closing
Guantanamo, but he still treats the prisoners there as "suspected
terrorists." They have not been tried and have not been found guilty. So
when Obama proposes taking people out of Guantanamo and putting
them into other prisons, he's not advancing the cause of constitutional
rights very far. And then he's gone into court arguing for preventive
detention, and he's continued the policy of sending suspects to
countries where they very well may be tortured.
I think people are dazzled by Obama's rhetoric, and that people ought to
begin to understand that Obama is going to be a mediocre
president--which means, in our time, a dangerous president--unless there
is some national movement to push him in a better direction.