

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Bali, Indonesia - Yuyun Ismawati recently won the 2009 Goldman Environmental Prize,
known as the "Green Nobel", for her waste to wealth approach to
cleaning up municipal waste in Bali, Indonesia. She developed a
community based waste management system, providing employment to former
rag and scrap collectors in recycling and composting efforts.
Bali, Indonesia - Yuyun Ismawati recently won the 2009 Goldman Environmental Prize,
known as the "Green Nobel", for her waste to wealth approach to
cleaning up municipal waste in Bali, Indonesia. She developed a
community based waste management system, providing employment to former
rag and scrap collectors in recycling and composting efforts. She is
providing jobs and income by diverting waste from municipal landfills,
but the greatest threat to her project isn't local officials, but
short-sighted global environmental policy.
The Clean Development Mechanism, a product of the 1997 Kyoto
Protocol, is intended to fund projects in the developing world to
reduce carbon emissions, offsetting the emissions of industry in the
developed world. However, poor design and loopholes have plagued the
Clean Development Mechanism and are threatening local sustainability
projects, including BaliFokus, Ismawati's nonprofit.
Ismawati's community-based sanitation project diverts the 70% of
municipal waste that is recyclable or compostable, processing it and
selling it to companies or farmers. Despite this successful model, she
is facing new threats from carbon credit financed projects. Ismawati
that "We have many cities in Indonesia now, they have proposals from
investors and buyers regarding the carbon credits, or CDM in the
landfill, which will require more garbage bringing to the landfill so
they can capture the methane and sell the carbon [credits] to the
buyers."
One such proposal, in Bali, the Gasification, Landfill Gas, and
Anaerobic Digestion (GALFAD) project would divert community waste from
her project to a landfill, intentionally increasing the production of
methane, a greenhouse gas over twenty times stronger than the carbon
dioxide emitted by composted waste. The landfill gas project would burn
the methane to power an electrical generator, yet such projects rarely
capture more than 20% of the methane and carbon dioxide mixture
emitted, meaning the GALFAD project would increase greenhouse gas
emissions by at least 800%, while eliminating an award-winning local
environmental project providing jobs, environmental benefits, and a
model to the Indonesian government.
The Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, reported that
"[Ismawati's] case is typicalof the CDM's interventions in the
municipal waste sector; its carbon credits have gone almost exclusively
to incineration and landfill gas projects". As all CDM projects are
registered online, a quick perusal
shows that the project would receive 15,784, 238 euros in carbon
credits, providing almost three-quarters of the 21,306,891 euro profit
from the project. The GALFAD project did not respond to requests for
comment.
"Most local governments now are more interested in supporting the
carbon credit projects, instead of local grassroots and people powered
or people centered activities", Ismawati told writers and bloggers in
an audio interview, highlighting the contradiction between global
climate policy and local environmental action.
As governments and advocates prepare for the Copenhagen climate
talks in December 2009, carbon markets remain a central mechanism to
combat global warming. Nevertheless, evidence is growing that without
regulation and reform, carbon trading between developed and developing
countries may harm local sustainability efforts worldwide.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Bali, Indonesia - Yuyun Ismawati recently won the 2009 Goldman Environmental Prize,
known as the "Green Nobel", for her waste to wealth approach to
cleaning up municipal waste in Bali, Indonesia. She developed a
community based waste management system, providing employment to former
rag and scrap collectors in recycling and composting efforts. She is
providing jobs and income by diverting waste from municipal landfills,
but the greatest threat to her project isn't local officials, but
short-sighted global environmental policy.
The Clean Development Mechanism, a product of the 1997 Kyoto
Protocol, is intended to fund projects in the developing world to
reduce carbon emissions, offsetting the emissions of industry in the
developed world. However, poor design and loopholes have plagued the
Clean Development Mechanism and are threatening local sustainability
projects, including BaliFokus, Ismawati's nonprofit.
Ismawati's community-based sanitation project diverts the 70% of
municipal waste that is recyclable or compostable, processing it and
selling it to companies or farmers. Despite this successful model, she
is facing new threats from carbon credit financed projects. Ismawati
that "We have many cities in Indonesia now, they have proposals from
investors and buyers regarding the carbon credits, or CDM in the
landfill, which will require more garbage bringing to the landfill so
they can capture the methane and sell the carbon [credits] to the
buyers."
One such proposal, in Bali, the Gasification, Landfill Gas, and
Anaerobic Digestion (GALFAD) project would divert community waste from
her project to a landfill, intentionally increasing the production of
methane, a greenhouse gas over twenty times stronger than the carbon
dioxide emitted by composted waste. The landfill gas project would burn
the methane to power an electrical generator, yet such projects rarely
capture more than 20% of the methane and carbon dioxide mixture
emitted, meaning the GALFAD project would increase greenhouse gas
emissions by at least 800%, while eliminating an award-winning local
environmental project providing jobs, environmental benefits, and a
model to the Indonesian government.
The Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, reported that
"[Ismawati's] case is typicalof the CDM's interventions in the
municipal waste sector; its carbon credits have gone almost exclusively
to incineration and landfill gas projects". As all CDM projects are
registered online, a quick perusal
shows that the project would receive 15,784, 238 euros in carbon
credits, providing almost three-quarters of the 21,306,891 euro profit
from the project. The GALFAD project did not respond to requests for
comment.
"Most local governments now are more interested in supporting the
carbon credit projects, instead of local grassroots and people powered
or people centered activities", Ismawati told writers and bloggers in
an audio interview, highlighting the contradiction between global
climate policy and local environmental action.
As governments and advocates prepare for the Copenhagen climate
talks in December 2009, carbon markets remain a central mechanism to
combat global warming. Nevertheless, evidence is growing that without
regulation and reform, carbon trading between developed and developing
countries may harm local sustainability efforts worldwide.
Bali, Indonesia - Yuyun Ismawati recently won the 2009 Goldman Environmental Prize,
known as the "Green Nobel", for her waste to wealth approach to
cleaning up municipal waste in Bali, Indonesia. She developed a
community based waste management system, providing employment to former
rag and scrap collectors in recycling and composting efforts. She is
providing jobs and income by diverting waste from municipal landfills,
but the greatest threat to her project isn't local officials, but
short-sighted global environmental policy.
The Clean Development Mechanism, a product of the 1997 Kyoto
Protocol, is intended to fund projects in the developing world to
reduce carbon emissions, offsetting the emissions of industry in the
developed world. However, poor design and loopholes have plagued the
Clean Development Mechanism and are threatening local sustainability
projects, including BaliFokus, Ismawati's nonprofit.
Ismawati's community-based sanitation project diverts the 70% of
municipal waste that is recyclable or compostable, processing it and
selling it to companies or farmers. Despite this successful model, she
is facing new threats from carbon credit financed projects. Ismawati
that "We have many cities in Indonesia now, they have proposals from
investors and buyers regarding the carbon credits, or CDM in the
landfill, which will require more garbage bringing to the landfill so
they can capture the methane and sell the carbon [credits] to the
buyers."
One such proposal, in Bali, the Gasification, Landfill Gas, and
Anaerobic Digestion (GALFAD) project would divert community waste from
her project to a landfill, intentionally increasing the production of
methane, a greenhouse gas over twenty times stronger than the carbon
dioxide emitted by composted waste. The landfill gas project would burn
the methane to power an electrical generator, yet such projects rarely
capture more than 20% of the methane and carbon dioxide mixture
emitted, meaning the GALFAD project would increase greenhouse gas
emissions by at least 800%, while eliminating an award-winning local
environmental project providing jobs, environmental benefits, and a
model to the Indonesian government.
The Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, reported that
"[Ismawati's] case is typicalof the CDM's interventions in the
municipal waste sector; its carbon credits have gone almost exclusively
to incineration and landfill gas projects". As all CDM projects are
registered online, a quick perusal
shows that the project would receive 15,784, 238 euros in carbon
credits, providing almost three-quarters of the 21,306,891 euro profit
from the project. The GALFAD project did not respond to requests for
comment.
"Most local governments now are more interested in supporting the
carbon credit projects, instead of local grassroots and people powered
or people centered activities", Ismawati told writers and bloggers in
an audio interview, highlighting the contradiction between global
climate policy and local environmental action.
As governments and advocates prepare for the Copenhagen climate
talks in December 2009, carbon markets remain a central mechanism to
combat global warming. Nevertheless, evidence is growing that without
regulation and reform, carbon trading between developed and developing
countries may harm local sustainability efforts worldwide.