SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
");background-position:center;background-size:19px 19px;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:#222;padding:0;width:var(--form-elem-height);height:var(--form-elem-height);font-size:0;}:is(.js-newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter_bar.newsletter-wrapper) .widget__body:has(.response:not(:empty)) :is(.widget__headline, .widget__subheadline, #mc_embed_signup .mc-field-group, #mc_embed_signup input[type="submit"]){display:none;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) #mce-responses:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-row:1 / -1;grid-column:1 / -1;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget__body > .snark-line:has(.response:not(:empty)){grid-column:1 / -1;}:is(.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper) :is(.newsletter-campaign:has(.response:not(:empty)), .newsletter-and-social:has(.response:not(:empty))){width:100%;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;justify-content:center;align-items:center;gap:8px 20px;margin:0 auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .text-element{display:flex;color:var(--shares-color);margin:0 !important;font-weight:400 !important;font-size:16px !important;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col .whitebar_social{display:flex;gap:12px;width:auto;}.newsletter-wrapper .newsletter_bar_col a{margin:0;background-color:#0000;padding:0;width:32px;height:32px;}.newsletter-wrapper .social_icon:after{display:none;}.newsletter-wrapper .widget article:before, .newsletter-wrapper .widget article:after{display:none;}#sFollow_Block_0_0_1_0_0_0_1{margin:0;}.donation_banner{position:relative;background:#000;}.donation_banner .posts-custom *, .donation_banner .posts-custom :after, .donation_banner .posts-custom :before{margin:0;}.donation_banner .posts-custom .widget{position:absolute;inset:0;}.donation_banner__wrapper{position:relative;z-index:2;pointer-events:none;}.donation_banner .donate_btn{position:relative;z-index:2;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_0{color:#fff;}#sSHARED_-_Support_Block_0_0_7_0_0_3_1_1{font-weight:normal;}.sticky-sidebar{margin:auto;}@media (min-width: 980px){.main:has(.sticky-sidebar){overflow:visible;}}@media (min-width: 980px){.row:has(.sticky-sidebar){display:flex;overflow:visible;}}@media (min-width: 980px){.sticky-sidebar{position:-webkit-sticky;position:sticky;top:100px;transition:top .3s ease-in-out, position .3s ease-in-out;}}.grey_newsblock .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper, .newsletter-wrapper.sidebar{background:linear-gradient(91deg, #005dc7 28%, #1d63b2 65%, #0353ae 85%);}
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The decision by Prime Minister Donald Tusk came after the Polish military shot down several Russian drones that entered its airspace, marking the first time a NATO member has fired shots in the war between Russia and Ukraine.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk invoked Article 4 of the North Atlantic Treaty on Wednesday after 19 Russian drones flew into Polish territory late Tuesday night and into the early morning hours.
Speaking to Poland's parliament on Wednesday, Tusk said that it is "the closest we have been to open conflict since World War II," though he still said there was "no reason to believe we're on the brink of war."
The Polish military, along with NATO forces, shot down several of the drones, marking the first time a NATO-aligned country has fired a shot since Russia first invaded Ukraine in 2022.
According to Polish officials, the drones entered the nation's airspace amid a series of airstrikes directed at Western Ukraine. Though some damage to at least one home has been reported due to falling drone debris, there are no immediate reports of casualties, according to the New York Times.
Following what he called a "large-scale provocation" by Russia, Tusk took the significant step of invoking Article 4 of the NATO treaty for just the eighth time since the alliance's founding in 1949.
Short of the more drastic Article 5, which obligates NATO allies to defend one another militarily at a time of attack, Article 4 allows any member to call on the rest of the alliance to consult with them if they feel their territory, independence, or security is threatened.
Russia, for its part, said it had "no intentions to engage any targets on the territory of Poland." However, as German defense minister Boris Pistorius said in a quote to AFP, the drones were "clearly set on this course" and "did not have to fly this route to reach Ukraine."
In comments to The Guardian, Dr. Marion Messmer, senior research fellow at the foreign policy think tank Chatham House, agreed it was "unlikely that this was an accident" and said that Russia was likely "trying to test where NATO's red lines are."
European leaders issued statements of solidarity following the attack.
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called it an "egregious and unprecedented violation of Polish and NATO airspace" and pledged to "ramp up the pressure on [Russian President] Putin until there is a just and lasting peace." The UK's secretary of state for defense, John Healey, said he would ask British armed forces "to look at options to bolster NATO's air defense over Poland."
French President Emmanuel Macron called it a "reckless escalation," adding that France will "not compromise on the security of the Allies."
Tusk asserted that "words are not enough" and has requested more material support from Poland's allies, which could point to the risk of further escalation.
While the invocation of Article 4 does not always presage a hot war, Yasraj Sharma writes for Al Jazeera that it "would serve as a political precursor to Article 5 deliberations."
Following the attack, the US ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, said in a post on X that the United States "will defend every inch of NATO territory," suggesting a possible willingness for the US to become more directly involved in the hostilities after providing over $128 billion in military and other aid to Ukraine since Russia first attacked in 2022.
The US has roughly 10,000 troops stationed in Poland as part of a permanent military presence in the country.
US President Donald Trump, meanwhile, wrote in an uncharacteristically brief post on Truth Social: "What's with Russia violating Poland's airspace with drones? Here we go!"
Trump plans to speak with Poland's president, Karol Nawrocki, on Wednesday, according to Reuters.
The drone attack came shortly after Trump threatened to impose harsher sanctions on Russia following its ramp-up of attacks on Kyiv over the weekend, yet another policy shift by the US president after he appeared interested in cutting a deal favorable to Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit last month.
In the New York Times, Moscow bureau chief Anton Troianovski writes that with Russia's entry into Polish airspace, along with its more aggressive attacks on Ukraine, "Putin is signaling that he will not compromise on his core demands even as he claims that Russia is still ready to make a deal."
The policy shift—which began during the first Trump administration—came after lobbying from US drone makers and amid stiff competition from Chinese, Israeli, and Turkish manufacturers.
After years of lobbying from US weapons makers, President Donald Trump is reportedly set to implement his first-term reinterpretation of a Cold War-era arms control treaty in order to sell heavy attack drones to countries including Saudi Arabia, according to a report published Friday.
In July 2020, Trump announced that his administration would reclassify unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with flight speeds under 500 miles per hour—including General Atomics' MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper and Northrop Grumman's Global Hawk—as exempt from certain restrictions under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR).
Signed by the United States in 1987 during the administration of President Ronald Reagan, the 35-nation MTCR "seeks to limit the risks of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by controlling exports of goods and technologies that could make a contribution to delivery systems" for such weapons, as the US State Department website explains.
The end of Trump's first term limited his first administration's implementation of the MTCR policy shift, which was not continued under former President Joe Biden, who adopted a somewhat stricter stance on arms exports to some gross human violators including Saudi Arabia, but not others—most notably Israel.
Now, a US official and four people familiar with the president's plan tell Reuters that Trump is preparing to complete the MTCR revision, a move that "would unlock the sale of more than 100 MQ-9 drones to Saudi Arabia, which the kingdom requested in the spring of this year and could be part of a $142 billion arms deal announced in May."
As Reuters reported:
Under the current interpretation of the MTCR, the sale of many military drones is subject to a "strong presumption of denial" unless a compelling security reason is given and the buyer agrees to use the weapons in strict accordance with international law.
The new policy will allow General Atomics, Kratos, and Anduril, which manufacture large drones, to have their products treated as "Foreign Military Sales" by the State Department, allowing them to be easily sold internationally, according to a US official speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity.
This effort is the first part of a planned "major" review of the US Foreign Military Sales program, the official said.
The US State Department did not respond to Reuters' request for comment on the policy shift.
Trump's move comes as US arms makers face stiff competition from Chinese, Israeli, and Turkish drone manufacturers. Neither China nor Israel are signatory to the MTCR, and Turkey, which did sign the agreement, features lighter and shorter-range UAVs not subject to the same restrictions as the heavier Reaper.
The US official who spoke to Reuters said the new guidelines will allow the US "to become the premier drone provider instead of ceding that space to Turkey and China."
Daryl Kimball, director of the Arms Control Association—a longtime critic of MTCR revision—warned that Trump's planned reinterpretation "would be a mistake."
No more than a dozen protesters can get people talking about war on a military base and in a military town.
I learned in April this year that it is not necessary to marshal hundreds of protesters to have a powerful impact, particularly if just one protester is willing to risk arrest.
Here is what happened.
As I stood holding a “Hands off Palestine” sign outside the west gate of New Mexico’s Holloman AFB, the home of the largest training base in the US for killer drone operators, I looked back, over my shoulder, and I was astounded to see Toby Blomé, the chief organizer of the protest, lying flat on the pavement, blocking a car trying to enter the base. Holloman graduates over 700 killer drone operators a year.
Toby was not only interrupting the base’s daily routine in a call to conscience, she was demonstrating how no more than a dozen protesters can get people talking about war on a military base and in a military town, Alamogordo, New Mexico.
We had come to Alamogordo on Sunday, April 20, 2025 for a weeklong “Shut Down Drone Warfare” protest, the third such protest in three years.
Most of the MPs were very young, and several seemed troubled by what Toby was saying.
Each morning and afternoon during commuting hours that week, we stood with our signs and banners along Route 70, stretching flat, hot, and dusty across the vast Tularosa Basin, running west to the main entrance to Holloman, and beyond, to the Arizona state line.
Our visual messages changed daily as we connected the dots between militarism and ecocide, climate chaos, political indoctrination, and the immorality and illegality of drone warfare. This year we particularly emphasized US complicity in the horrific genocide in Palestine, where US drones are being used for surveillance in support of Israeli attacks in Gaza and, we believe, elsewhere in the region.
We watched intently for any sign of approval from base personnel as they sped to and from work, many thrilling at the speed and muffler blare of their hot-rodded sedans and sports cars or their motorcycles. We were rewarded with sparse waves, peace signs, and honks, including from other travelers, most frequently in air horn blasts from the drivers of commercial 18-wheelers.
As is the custom of the annual protest, on Wednesday, we planned a direct action, blocking an entrance to the base and holding the blockade for as long as possible. This year, Toby suggested that we go to the base’s west gate instead of the main entrance.
We had learned on Monday that a new feature near the base’s main entrance is a blue line, apparently painted expressly for us, allegedly marking the boundary between federal property, subject to federal trespassing charges, and Otero County property, subject to county law, which would possibly carry lesser penalties for trespassers. It was over 200 feet farther away from where we had occasionally stationed ourselves in past years, giving us less access to traffic approaching the gate’s entrance.
On Wednesday, 12 of us arrived at the west gate at about 6:00 am MT. As the sun began to rise over the Sacramento Mountains, we walked fast across the four-lane highway and quickly set ourselves up across the gate entrance with our signs, banners, and Veterans for Peace flag.
Toby was the only who felt that she could fully risk arrest. There were five others of us who were willing to take a lower risk and participate in the human blockade until county officers arrived to order us to disperse.
Toby, standing in the middle of us, held a sign saying, “HOLLOMAN, NO DRONES 4 GENOCIDE.” Others on either side held banners reading, “CEASEFIRE For the Children” and “Every 15 Minutes A Child in Gaza is… Killed.”
All of us were initially standing on the “federal” side of the new blue line. In addition to the banners and signs, we were each wearing small signs over our chests, with a different name and age of one of the Gaza children killed in the genocide since October 7, 2023.
Almost immediately, a black sedan, driven by a woman, pulled into the short driveway, stopping just short of our blockade, unable to pass. None of us moved. At least three military police (MPs) came from inside the base to talk with Toby as a line of cars and pickup trucks of base personnel began to back up on Route 70. Toward the end of the jammed-up line, some drivers began to pull out of line, crossing into the eastbound lanes to head back to the base’s main gate.
We in the driveway were told that we were trespassing on federal property, and that we faced federal trespassing charges. At that point, those flanking Toby with banners stepped forward onto Otero County property. Toby remained behind us, on the federal side of the line. Toby continued to talk with the MPs, explaining the need to stop drone killing.
As one MP warned Toby of her pending arrest, she quickly lay down silently in front of the black car, in an unplanned extremely effective, brave act. Two banner holders moved behind the black car so that it could not back up.
Toby Blomé lies down in front of a black sedan.
While lying on the ground, Toby talked to the five or six MPs now gathered about the dire conditions in Gaza, including the slaughter of thousands of children. She implored them to recognize their complicity and urged them to educate themselves on the US role in the genocide.
Most of the MPs were very young, and several seemed troubled by what Toby was saying. One squatted down in front of Toby and attempted to persuade her to get up, unsuccessfully.
After what seemed to be about 15 minutes, all the MPs had disappeared. Toby got up, remaining in front of the black sedan. Two very aggressive drivers whizzed off the edge of the driveway to get past the blockade, speeding dangerously into the base. Toby, by now distracted from the exact location of the new blue line, urged several of us other blockaders to back up closer to the gate entrance to prevent other cars from entering and to avoid an accident.
At that point the MPs returned and arrested Toby. Taking her ID and handcuffing her, they escorted her onto the base. The “low-risk blockades” were still holding. About 35-40 minutes had passed by now.
At this point, three tall heavyset Otero County Sheriff’s deputies pulled up and swaggered over to two blockaders holding a banner. One of the deputies angrily tore the banner away from the two and threw it on the ground. This surprised the deputy in charge of the detail who told the angry man to step back, and a third deputy held him by the arm to restrain him.
The sheriff’s men told us to get out of the driveway or get arrested, and we moved to the side of the driveway.
Toby, still being detained just inside the base gate, continued to try to educate the MPs, giving them sources for reliable news and information and of support for GI resisters. She was soon cited and released, having been charged with trespassing on federal property and told that she would be notified by mail of a court hearing. Toby joined the other protesters, and all but two, who stayed at the west gate, continued their vigil at the main gate for the remainder of the morning commute.
As the pair staying at the west gate held their banner, a driver exiting the base stopped, rolled down his passenger side window, and said words to the effect, “I want you to know that not all the people on the base agree with what is happening in Gaza.”
The next day, when Toby went into the office of nearby Oliver Lee Memorial State Park, where most of the protesters were staying, a woman staffer told her, “You guys are all over the internet, and people are not happy.”