December, 21 2010, 03:39pm EDT

Milestone Measure to Advance Food Safety Passes Congress
The nation's food safety system is responsible for
3,000 deaths each year, and 48 million illnesses annually <https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2010/r101215.html>
, according to newly
released data from the federal Centers for Disease Control. Landmark
federal legislation enacted today by Congress should significantly
reduce that terrible human toll.
WASHINGTON
The nation's food safety system is responsible for
3,000 deaths each year, and 48 million illnesses annually <https://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2010/r101215.html>
, according to newly
released data from the federal Centers for Disease Control. Landmark
federal legislation enacted today by Congress should significantly
reduce that terrible human toll.
"It's simply unacceptable that in the 21st century, with all our
technology and know-how, 48 million Americans - that's a one in six --
contract food-borne illnesses every year," said Ken Cook,
president and co-founder of Environmental Working
Group (EWG), which has campaigned for nearly 20 years to modernize the
U.S. agriculture system and rid the food supply of pesticides and other
industrial pollutants. "This bill can serve as the cornerstone of a truly modern food policy. But we have
to look beyond acute episodes of food poisoning, serious as they are. Our research shows that Americans, even
infants in the womb <https://www.ewg.org/minoritycordblood/home> , are being bombarded with pesticides, industrial chemicals
and other toxic substances that make their way into food."
U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) worked hard to include a
provision in the food safety bill that would have restricted the use of
the toxic plastics chemical bisphenol A (BPA) from baby bottles and
sippy cups, but an 11th hour call
from top industry lobbyists <https://www.enviroblog.org/2010/11/polluting-babies-it-just-takes-a-phone-call.html>
to key Republican senators killed her proposal.
The Food Safety Modernization Act, which now goes to President Obama for
his signature, would establish rigorous, modern food inspections aimed
at preventing food adulterated by E. coli, salmonella and other
contaminants from reaching supermarkets, restaurants
and family dinner tables.
The measure gives more responsibility to farmers and producers to stop
contamination and authorizes the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to
order recalls. Under current law, the agency can recommend but not force
recalls of possibly tainted food from stores
and restaurants.
"The last time any steps were taken to improve food safety in
country the image of Grant Wood's American Gothic was the reality on
most farms," added Cook.
"Today's agricultural landscape is dominated by huge corporate
operations that are often the source of outbreaks. The FDA will be
empowered with more inspectors and more authority to recall suspect food
immediately, and will hold food producers responsible
for assuring their facilities are clean."
The big chemical agriculture interests, led by United Produce
and Western Growers threatened to kill the bill in the House over a
provision that would exempt some small family farms from certain
regulations.
Cook added: "EWG will be a watchdog on this law to make sure it
protects people from food-borne illness without placing an unacceptable
regulatory burden on the small farms and companies that are driving the
exciting, emergent local food movement."
The champions in Congress who deserve much of the credit for modernizing
a food safety system are Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA), Richard Durbin
(D-IL), Mike Enzi (R-WI) and Representatives John Dingell (D-MI), Henry
Waxman (D-CA), Bart Stupak (D-MI) and Frank
Pallone (D-NJ).
Numerous public interest groups worked tirelessly to ensure safer food
for all Americans including U.S. PIRG and the Make Our Food Safe
Coalition including Consumers Union, Pew Charitable Trusts and Center
for Science in the Public Interest.
The Environmental Working Group is a community 30 million strong, working to protect our environmental health by changing industry standards.
(202) 667-6982LATEST NEWS
Trump Social Security Chief Applauds Budget Bill That Will Harm Social Security's Finances
"The Social Security Administration put out a statement celebrating a bill that would lead to faster insolvency of the Social Security Trust Fund."
Jul 04, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump's handpicked Social Security chief issued a statement Thursday applauding the passage of a Republican reconciliation bill that analysts say would negatively impact the New Deal program's finances.
Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano called the Republican legislation, which Trump is expected to sign on Friday, a "historic step forward for America's seniors" and a reaffirmation of the president's "promise to protect Social Security."
But experts warned in the lead-up to the bill's passage that its massive tax cuts would bring forward the date at which Social Security will no longer be able to pay out full benefits in the absence of legislative solutions.
"By raising the standard deduction for all filers, and raising it even higher for some seniors, fewer Social Security beneficiaries will pay taxes on their benefits, and those who do will pay lower rates," said Kathleen Romig and Gbenga Ajilore of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "Raising the standard deduction would deliver little to no benefit to lower- and moderate-income families while reducing income into Social Security's trust funds."
The Social Security Administration put out a statement celebrating a bill that would lead to faster insolvency of the Social Security Trust Fund pic.twitter.com/aRhLfcRiIv
— Bobby Kogan (@BBKogan) July 4, 2025
According to the latest Social Security Board of Trustees report—released ahead of the reconciliation bill's passage—the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be able to pay out 100% of benefits until 2033. Thereafter, if lawmakers don't act, the fund will be able to pay out 77% of total scheduled benefits.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), a conservative think tank, estimated in an analysis released last month that the Republican reconciliation package would accelerate the depletion of Social Security and Medicare's trust funds by a year. Compared to current law, the GOP measure would also result in "even deeper" cuts to Social Security benefits after the trust fund depletion date, the analysis projected.
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), a leading champion of Social Security Expansion in Congress, highlighted CRFB's findings in a video posted to social media a day before House Republicans secured final passage of the reconciliation bill.
"We have to act now, not just to protect Social Security but to expand the benefits," said Larson. "It needs to be protected, it needs to be enhanced—not cut and diminished."
Keep ReadingShow Less
NYT Runs Hit Piece on Mamdani Based on Tip From Proponent of 'Race Science'
Reports from multiple outlets show the Times is vastly underselling its source's extreme views on race.
Jul 04, 2025
The New York Times on Thursday published a story questioning New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's past statements about his racial background based on a tip it received from a proponent of "race science."
The Times piece in question focused on Mamdani's college application to Columbia University in which he listed both "Asian" and "Black or African American" as his race.
Although both of Mamdani's parents are of Indian descent, he was born in the African country of Uganda and lived there for the first five years of his life. Mamdani told the Times that he checked the box on the application for "Black or African American" because he considers himself an American who was born in Africa. He emphasized that he does not identify as Black and argued that he found it difficult to express the complexity of his racial background given the options on the application.
However, what is stirring controversy about the Times piece isn't so much its content but the source of its information. The Times acknowledges that the information on Mamdani was culled from a large hack of a Columbia database and that it received a copy of Mamdani's application from "an intermediary who goes by the name Crémieux on Substack and X," whom it describes as "an academic who opposes affirmative action and writes often about I.Q. and race."
A report from The Guardian's Jason Wilson published earlier this year shows that the Times is vastly underselling its source's extreme views on race. As Wilson documented, the "Crémieux" cited by the Times is a man named Jordan Lasker, whose writings regularly defend the work of "race scientists" who use I.Q. test results to argue that Black people are mentally inferior to other races.
"Crémieux runs a Substack also featuring posts on the supposed relationships between race and I.Q.," Wilson explained. "A prominently featured post there seeks to defend the argument that average national IQs vary by up to 40 points, with countries in Europe, North America, and East Asia at the high end and countries in the global south at the low end, and several African countries purportedly having average national IQs at a level that experts associate with mental impairment."
Another report from Talking Points Memo's Hunter Walker found that Lasker has regularly posted about a racial "I.Q. gap" and has even suggested that there are "genetic pathways of crime." On his X account, Lasker has mused about the differences in brain sizes between Black and white Americans and between women and men more generally.
Brandon McEuen, a historian at Wayne State University who specializes in teaching about the history of the eugenics movement, slammed the Times for not only relying on Lasker as its source for the story on Mamdani but also for granting him anonymity.
"The decision to keep Lasker anonymous is ridiculous since his name has already been published in other outlets that don't provide softballs for eugenicists," he wrote on his Bluesky account.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says Every Republican Who Backed Trump-GOP Budget 'Must Pay a Price at the Ballot Box'
"They do not deserve to be re-elected and they must be defeated," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Jul 04, 2025
As communities across the United States braced for impact after congressional Republicans approved the biggest Medicaid and nutrition assistance cuts in the nation's history, Sen. Bernie Sanders said Thursday that every lawmaker who supported the budget legislation "must pay a price at the ballot box" in the 2026 midterms and beyond.
"This bill includes the largest cut ever to Medicaid in order to pay for the largest tax break for billionaires that we have ever seen," Sanders (I-Vt.), who is working to recruit progressive candidates for office, said after the House passed the legislation, sending it to President Donald Trump's desk.
"Make no mistake about it: This bill is a death sentence for working-class and low-income Americans," said Sanders.
While some GOP lawmakers in the House and Senate voiced concerns about the bill's massive cuts to Medicaid and other programs as the measure moved through Congress, the legislation ultimately garnered near-unanimous support from the Republican caucus when it came time for the final votes. Just three out of 53 Republican senators and two out of 220 GOP representatives voted against the completed bill.
Analysts and advocates expect the legislation to inflict major damage across the country, shuttering rural hospitals, stripping health coverage and food aid from millions, raising costs for Medicare recipients, and devastating local economies.
Some of the pain will be concentrated in swing districts currently represented by Republican supporters of the budget package. For example, 64% of Rep. David Valadao's (R-Calif.) constituents in California's 22nd Congressional District rely on Medicaid.
Valadao is one of 10 Republicans targeted by an ad push that the advocacy group Protect Our Care launched following Thursday's vote in the House. The other targeted lawmakers are Reps. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.), Young Kim (R-Calif.), Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), Ryan Mackenzie (R-Pa.), Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.), and Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.).
Brad Woodhouse, president of Protect Our Care, said in a statement that "these Republicans just voted for the largest healthcare cuts in history in order to fund tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations, and we're going to make sure that every single one of their constituents knows it."
"These Republicans betrayed their constituents and working Americans' healthcare for billionaire tax cuts," Woodhouse added, "and we're ready to go from the grassroots to the airwaves until every last one of them is held accountable."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular