SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Donald Trump Jr. listens to a speech on the first day of the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
A 'Lie to the American People': Despite Repeated Denials, Lawyer Admits Trump Dictated Son's Misleading Statement
"There's no wiggle room. They said the president had nothing to do with that statement by Donald Trump Jr."
Jun 03, 2018
In addition to the "ludicrous" argument that the President of the United States cannot by definition obstruct justice, the overnight fallout generated by a memo by President Donald Trump's legal team obtained and then published online by the New York Times on Saturday also includes those expressing deep concern over how the president's personal attorney Jay Sekulow openly admits in the document--despite earlier and repeated denials to the contrary--that Trump did, in fact, help orchestrate a misleading statement about the now infamous "Trump Tower meeting" in which Donald Trump Jr. hoped to receive political dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russian nationals during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Appearing on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday morning, former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara reacted to the revelations by saying, "There's no wiggle room. They said the president had nothing to do with that statement by Donald Trump Jr."
He further explained why the admission by Sekulow contained in the memo is so troubling:
As CNN documented with the examples below, both Sekulow and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued repeated denials last year that President Trump had any direct involvement in the crafting of the statement:
Trump lawyer Sekulow, CNN interview, 7/12/17: "That was written, no that was written by Donald Trump Jr. and I'm sure with consultation with his lawyer. That wasn't written by the president."Sekulow, ABC interview, 7/12/17: "The president didn't sign off on anything. He was coming back from the G20. The statement that was released Saturday was released by Donald Trump Jr., I'm sure in consultation with his lawyers. The President wasn't involved in that."Sekulow, NBC interview, 7/16/17: "The President was not -- did not -- draft the response. The response came from Donald Trump Jr. and -- I'm sure -- in consultation with his lawyer. ... Let me say this -- but I do want to be clear -- that the President was not involved in the drafting of the statement and did not issue the statement. It came from Donald Trump Jr.Sekulow, statement to the Washington Post, 7/31/17: "Apart from being of no consequence, the characterizations are misinformed, inaccurate, and not pertinent."White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, daily press briefing, 8/1/17: "He certainly didn't dictate, but he -- like I said, he weighed in, offered suggestion like any father would do."
On NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday morning, host Chuck Todd pressed another member of Trump's personal legal team, Rudy Giuliani, to explain the discrepancies as he compared Sekulow's on-air statements last year with the admission contained in the January memo:
Writing for Mother Jones, and referencing Donald Jr.'s account to Congress in closed-door testimony, journalist David Corn also said the new revelations could be a "big problem" for Trump, his eldest son, or both:
Trump Jr. certainly did not inform the committee that his father had dictated the statement. In fact, he made it seem as if Trump was marginally involved, if at all. Yet according to the letter written by Trump's own lawyers, Trump was in charge of the statement.
Trump Jr.'s remarks to the committee conveyed an inaccurate impression and can be seen as an attempt to provide cover for his pop. They might even be considered false statements. By the way, it's a crime to lie to Congress.
While it remains unclear what exactly Trump knew--if anything--prior to the meeting, his role in crafting the message will surely intensify scrutiny of the classic question formulation: What did the president know and when did he know it?
As part of the intrigue, several news outlets reported last month on the revelation that Donald Jr. "made several mysterious phone calls to blocked numbers before and after the Trump Tower meeting." According to The Daily Beast:
On the day he arranged the meeting the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting in June 2016, Trump Jr. placed two calls to blocked numbers. After the meeting ended without the promised dirt, Trump Jr. placed another call to a blocked number.
When asked if his father used a blocked number on any phone, Trump Jr. told the committee: "I don't know." Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, on the other hand, testified that Trump's "primary residence has a blocked [phone] line."
Asked directly if he had told his father about the meeting, Trump Jr. said, "I never discussed it with him at all."
Those comments do not square easily with what President Trump's own personal attorney admitted to the special counsel.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In addition to the "ludicrous" argument that the President of the United States cannot by definition obstruct justice, the overnight fallout generated by a memo by President Donald Trump's legal team obtained and then published online by the New York Times on Saturday also includes those expressing deep concern over how the president's personal attorney Jay Sekulow openly admits in the document--despite earlier and repeated denials to the contrary--that Trump did, in fact, help orchestrate a misleading statement about the now infamous "Trump Tower meeting" in which Donald Trump Jr. hoped to receive political dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russian nationals during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Appearing on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday morning, former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara reacted to the revelations by saying, "There's no wiggle room. They said the president had nothing to do with that statement by Donald Trump Jr."
He further explained why the admission by Sekulow contained in the memo is so troubling:
As CNN documented with the examples below, both Sekulow and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued repeated denials last year that President Trump had any direct involvement in the crafting of the statement:
Trump lawyer Sekulow, CNN interview, 7/12/17: "That was written, no that was written by Donald Trump Jr. and I'm sure with consultation with his lawyer. That wasn't written by the president."Sekulow, ABC interview, 7/12/17: "The president didn't sign off on anything. He was coming back from the G20. The statement that was released Saturday was released by Donald Trump Jr., I'm sure in consultation with his lawyers. The President wasn't involved in that."Sekulow, NBC interview, 7/16/17: "The President was not -- did not -- draft the response. The response came from Donald Trump Jr. and -- I'm sure -- in consultation with his lawyer. ... Let me say this -- but I do want to be clear -- that the President was not involved in the drafting of the statement and did not issue the statement. It came from Donald Trump Jr.Sekulow, statement to the Washington Post, 7/31/17: "Apart from being of no consequence, the characterizations are misinformed, inaccurate, and not pertinent."White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, daily press briefing, 8/1/17: "He certainly didn't dictate, but he -- like I said, he weighed in, offered suggestion like any father would do."
On NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday morning, host Chuck Todd pressed another member of Trump's personal legal team, Rudy Giuliani, to explain the discrepancies as he compared Sekulow's on-air statements last year with the admission contained in the January memo:
Writing for Mother Jones, and referencing Donald Jr.'s account to Congress in closed-door testimony, journalist David Corn also said the new revelations could be a "big problem" for Trump, his eldest son, or both:
Trump Jr. certainly did not inform the committee that his father had dictated the statement. In fact, he made it seem as if Trump was marginally involved, if at all. Yet according to the letter written by Trump's own lawyers, Trump was in charge of the statement.
Trump Jr.'s remarks to the committee conveyed an inaccurate impression and can be seen as an attempt to provide cover for his pop. They might even be considered false statements. By the way, it's a crime to lie to Congress.
While it remains unclear what exactly Trump knew--if anything--prior to the meeting, his role in crafting the message will surely intensify scrutiny of the classic question formulation: What did the president know and when did he know it?
As part of the intrigue, several news outlets reported last month on the revelation that Donald Jr. "made several mysterious phone calls to blocked numbers before and after the Trump Tower meeting." According to The Daily Beast:
On the day he arranged the meeting the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting in June 2016, Trump Jr. placed two calls to blocked numbers. After the meeting ended without the promised dirt, Trump Jr. placed another call to a blocked number.
When asked if his father used a blocked number on any phone, Trump Jr. told the committee: "I don't know." Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, on the other hand, testified that Trump's "primary residence has a blocked [phone] line."
Asked directly if he had told his father about the meeting, Trump Jr. said, "I never discussed it with him at all."
Those comments do not square easily with what President Trump's own personal attorney admitted to the special counsel.
In addition to the "ludicrous" argument that the President of the United States cannot by definition obstruct justice, the overnight fallout generated by a memo by President Donald Trump's legal team obtained and then published online by the New York Times on Saturday also includes those expressing deep concern over how the president's personal attorney Jay Sekulow openly admits in the document--despite earlier and repeated denials to the contrary--that Trump did, in fact, help orchestrate a misleading statement about the now infamous "Trump Tower meeting" in which Donald Trump Jr. hoped to receive political dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russian nationals during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Appearing on CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday morning, former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara reacted to the revelations by saying, "There's no wiggle room. They said the president had nothing to do with that statement by Donald Trump Jr."
He further explained why the admission by Sekulow contained in the memo is so troubling:
As CNN documented with the examples below, both Sekulow and White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued repeated denials last year that President Trump had any direct involvement in the crafting of the statement:
Trump lawyer Sekulow, CNN interview, 7/12/17: "That was written, no that was written by Donald Trump Jr. and I'm sure with consultation with his lawyer. That wasn't written by the president."Sekulow, ABC interview, 7/12/17: "The president didn't sign off on anything. He was coming back from the G20. The statement that was released Saturday was released by Donald Trump Jr., I'm sure in consultation with his lawyers. The President wasn't involved in that."Sekulow, NBC interview, 7/16/17: "The President was not -- did not -- draft the response. The response came from Donald Trump Jr. and -- I'm sure -- in consultation with his lawyer. ... Let me say this -- but I do want to be clear -- that the President was not involved in the drafting of the statement and did not issue the statement. It came from Donald Trump Jr.Sekulow, statement to the Washington Post, 7/31/17: "Apart from being of no consequence, the characterizations are misinformed, inaccurate, and not pertinent."White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, daily press briefing, 8/1/17: "He certainly didn't dictate, but he -- like I said, he weighed in, offered suggestion like any father would do."
On NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday morning, host Chuck Todd pressed another member of Trump's personal legal team, Rudy Giuliani, to explain the discrepancies as he compared Sekulow's on-air statements last year with the admission contained in the January memo:
Writing for Mother Jones, and referencing Donald Jr.'s account to Congress in closed-door testimony, journalist David Corn also said the new revelations could be a "big problem" for Trump, his eldest son, or both:
Trump Jr. certainly did not inform the committee that his father had dictated the statement. In fact, he made it seem as if Trump was marginally involved, if at all. Yet according to the letter written by Trump's own lawyers, Trump was in charge of the statement.
Trump Jr.'s remarks to the committee conveyed an inaccurate impression and can be seen as an attempt to provide cover for his pop. They might even be considered false statements. By the way, it's a crime to lie to Congress.
While it remains unclear what exactly Trump knew--if anything--prior to the meeting, his role in crafting the message will surely intensify scrutiny of the classic question formulation: What did the president know and when did he know it?
As part of the intrigue, several news outlets reported last month on the revelation that Donald Jr. "made several mysterious phone calls to blocked numbers before and after the Trump Tower meeting." According to The Daily Beast:
On the day he arranged the meeting the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting in June 2016, Trump Jr. placed two calls to blocked numbers. After the meeting ended without the promised dirt, Trump Jr. placed another call to a blocked number.
When asked if his father used a blocked number on any phone, Trump Jr. told the committee: "I don't know." Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, on the other hand, testified that Trump's "primary residence has a blocked [phone] line."
Asked directly if he had told his father about the meeting, Trump Jr. said, "I never discussed it with him at all."
Those comments do not square easily with what President Trump's own personal attorney admitted to the special counsel.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.