SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite," Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement. (Photo: Mike Nelson/EPA)
Groups Slam Trump's Tax Loophole for Corporations as Massive 'Con Job'
Contrary to Trump administration talking points, the president's tax plan would "rig the rules" in favor of corporations that send jobs overseas
Oct 02, 2017
In a letter (pdf) to Congress on Monday, 100 advocacy groups denounced as "an incredibly bad idea" an under-discussed component of the Trump-GOP tax plan that would "allow U.S. multinational corporations to pay little to nothing on their offshore profits."
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite."
--Richard Trumka, AFL-CIOPortrayed by Republican architects of the recently unveiled tax framework (pdf) as a move toward a "territorial" system that would eliminate incentives for corporations to move profits overseas, the plan would in effect do precisely the reverse, signatories of the letter to Congress argue.
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite," Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement. "What a con job."
Under the current tax system, profits of American companies' foreign subsidiaries are supposed to be subject to the U.S. corporate tax rate, but companies are able to avoid these taxes by deferring until the profits are repatriated. The Republican plan would almost entirely exempt these profits from taxation.
Far from incentivizing investment in the U.S., the groups' letter argues that such a policy would provide major corporations "even greater incentive to engage in accounting tricks and move their profits to countries with zero or single-digit corporate tax rates."
Gary Kalman, executive director of the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency (FACT) Coalition, characterized the GOP's so-called "territorial" tax plan as "the largest offshore loophole in the history of our tax code."
The groups' letter explained:
Ending taxation of offshore profits would rig the rules in favor of multinational corporations, give them a competitive advantage over domestic businesses, and make our tax system more complicated. We cannot afford to give multinational corporations a giant loophole to avoid paying their fair share of taxes at a time when we need more revenue to create jobs rebuilding infrastructure, educating our children, expanding healthcare coverage, researching new medical cures, and ensuring a secure retirement.
The letter went on to argue that the American public is overwhelmingly opposed to any proposal that would ease the tax burden on offshore corporate profits.
"Three-quarters of Americans say they would oppose a tax system that does not tax offshore profits," the letter notes. "Only eight percent believe foreign profits should be taxed at a lower rate, and only four percent said they should not be taxed at all--which is what a territorial tax system would do."
Alan Essig, executive director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, concluded that the American tax system already treats offshore corporate profits with undue generosity. Trump's plan, Essig concluded, would make the system even better for businesses that send jobs overseas--and far worse for the American public.
"Corporate bosses would win while the rest of us would be left to pick up the tab," Essig said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a letter (pdf) to Congress on Monday, 100 advocacy groups denounced as "an incredibly bad idea" an under-discussed component of the Trump-GOP tax plan that would "allow U.S. multinational corporations to pay little to nothing on their offshore profits."
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite."
--Richard Trumka, AFL-CIOPortrayed by Republican architects of the recently unveiled tax framework (pdf) as a move toward a "territorial" system that would eliminate incentives for corporations to move profits overseas, the plan would in effect do precisely the reverse, signatories of the letter to Congress argue.
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite," Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement. "What a con job."
Under the current tax system, profits of American companies' foreign subsidiaries are supposed to be subject to the U.S. corporate tax rate, but companies are able to avoid these taxes by deferring until the profits are repatriated. The Republican plan would almost entirely exempt these profits from taxation.
Far from incentivizing investment in the U.S., the groups' letter argues that such a policy would provide major corporations "even greater incentive to engage in accounting tricks and move their profits to countries with zero or single-digit corporate tax rates."
Gary Kalman, executive director of the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency (FACT) Coalition, characterized the GOP's so-called "territorial" tax plan as "the largest offshore loophole in the history of our tax code."
The groups' letter explained:
Ending taxation of offshore profits would rig the rules in favor of multinational corporations, give them a competitive advantage over domestic businesses, and make our tax system more complicated. We cannot afford to give multinational corporations a giant loophole to avoid paying their fair share of taxes at a time when we need more revenue to create jobs rebuilding infrastructure, educating our children, expanding healthcare coverage, researching new medical cures, and ensuring a secure retirement.
The letter went on to argue that the American public is overwhelmingly opposed to any proposal that would ease the tax burden on offshore corporate profits.
"Three-quarters of Americans say they would oppose a tax system that does not tax offshore profits," the letter notes. "Only eight percent believe foreign profits should be taxed at a lower rate, and only four percent said they should not be taxed at all--which is what a territorial tax system would do."
Alan Essig, executive director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, concluded that the American tax system already treats offshore corporate profits with undue generosity. Trump's plan, Essig concluded, would make the system even better for businesses that send jobs overseas--and far worse for the American public.
"Corporate bosses would win while the rest of us would be left to pick up the tab," Essig said.
In a letter (pdf) to Congress on Monday, 100 advocacy groups denounced as "an incredibly bad idea" an under-discussed component of the Trump-GOP tax plan that would "allow U.S. multinational corporations to pay little to nothing on their offshore profits."
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite."
--Richard Trumka, AFL-CIOPortrayed by Republican architects of the recently unveiled tax framework (pdf) as a move toward a "territorial" system that would eliminate incentives for corporations to move profits overseas, the plan would in effect do precisely the reverse, signatories of the letter to Congress argue.
"It takes a lot of nerve to propose tax incentives for offshoring and then try to fool people into thinking you're doing the exact opposite," Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, said in a statement. "What a con job."
Under the current tax system, profits of American companies' foreign subsidiaries are supposed to be subject to the U.S. corporate tax rate, but companies are able to avoid these taxes by deferring until the profits are repatriated. The Republican plan would almost entirely exempt these profits from taxation.
Far from incentivizing investment in the U.S., the groups' letter argues that such a policy would provide major corporations "even greater incentive to engage in accounting tricks and move their profits to countries with zero or single-digit corporate tax rates."
Gary Kalman, executive director of the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency (FACT) Coalition, characterized the GOP's so-called "territorial" tax plan as "the largest offshore loophole in the history of our tax code."
The groups' letter explained:
Ending taxation of offshore profits would rig the rules in favor of multinational corporations, give them a competitive advantage over domestic businesses, and make our tax system more complicated. We cannot afford to give multinational corporations a giant loophole to avoid paying their fair share of taxes at a time when we need more revenue to create jobs rebuilding infrastructure, educating our children, expanding healthcare coverage, researching new medical cures, and ensuring a secure retirement.
The letter went on to argue that the American public is overwhelmingly opposed to any proposal that would ease the tax burden on offshore corporate profits.
"Three-quarters of Americans say they would oppose a tax system that does not tax offshore profits," the letter notes. "Only eight percent believe foreign profits should be taxed at a lower rate, and only four percent said they should not be taxed at all--which is what a territorial tax system would do."
Alan Essig, executive director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, concluded that the American tax system already treats offshore corporate profits with undue generosity. Trump's plan, Essig concluded, would make the system even better for businesses that send jobs overseas--and far worse for the American public.
"Corporate bosses would win while the rest of us would be left to pick up the tab," Essig said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.