SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Nearly 200 Dems Sue Trump for Placing 'Personal Interest Over National Interest'
Trump has 'repeatedly and flagrantly violated' the Constitution, said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)
Jun 14, 2017
In the latest bid to hold Donald Trump to account for refusing to sufficiently distance himself from his business empire, nearly 200 congressional Democrats filed a lawsuit (pdf) on Wednesday alleging the president has "repeatedly and flagrantly" violated the Constitution's emoluments clause.
"Unfortunately, we're now living with what will likely be known as the most corrupt administration in American history."
--Robert Weissman, Public Citizen
"It is the third such lawsuit against Mr. Trump on the issue since he became president," the New York Times noted, "part of a coordinated effort by the president's critics to force him to reveal his business entanglements and either sell off his holdings or put them in a blind trust."
The Times added this is likely "the most members of Congress to ever sue a sitting president."
This suit comes shortly after attorneys general from Maryland and the District of Columbia announced that they, too, are suing Trump for what they called "unprecedented constitutional violations."
The lawmakers' suit makes similar charges, arguing the "gifts and benefits" the president's businesses have received from foreign leaders may have compelled him to "put personal interest over national interest."
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who is leading the effort, said the suit is a direct result of Trump's refusal to seek congressional approval for profits received from foreign governments, as required by the Emoluments Clause. Some of the president's actions that constitute violations, the lawsuit argues, include "collecting payments from foreign diplomats who stay in his hotels and accepting trademark approvals from foreign governments for his company's goods and services," the Times reported.
The lawsuit says, in part:
Because [President Trump] is not coming to Congress and identifying the emoluments he wishes to accept, the American people will have no way of knowing whether his actions as President reflect only his beliefs about what is best for the country, or whether they are partly motivated by personal financial considerations.
Blumenthal argued that because of the "unique role" the framers granted members of Congress, they have "standing [to sue] that no one else has."
In a statement released on Wednesday, Public Citizen applauded this latest move to hold the president accountable and to uncover elements of his business dealings that he has persistently refused to disclose.
"The framers were so attuned to the threat that corruption poses to a working democracy that they wrote anti-corruption measures into the nation's foundational document," said Public Citizen president Robert Weissman. "Unfortunately, we're now living with what will likely be known as the most corrupt administration in American history."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the latest bid to hold Donald Trump to account for refusing to sufficiently distance himself from his business empire, nearly 200 congressional Democrats filed a lawsuit (pdf) on Wednesday alleging the president has "repeatedly and flagrantly" violated the Constitution's emoluments clause.
"Unfortunately, we're now living with what will likely be known as the most corrupt administration in American history."
--Robert Weissman, Public Citizen
"It is the third such lawsuit against Mr. Trump on the issue since he became president," the New York Times noted, "part of a coordinated effort by the president's critics to force him to reveal his business entanglements and either sell off his holdings or put them in a blind trust."
The Times added this is likely "the most members of Congress to ever sue a sitting president."
This suit comes shortly after attorneys general from Maryland and the District of Columbia announced that they, too, are suing Trump for what they called "unprecedented constitutional violations."
The lawmakers' suit makes similar charges, arguing the "gifts and benefits" the president's businesses have received from foreign leaders may have compelled him to "put personal interest over national interest."
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who is leading the effort, said the suit is a direct result of Trump's refusal to seek congressional approval for profits received from foreign governments, as required by the Emoluments Clause. Some of the president's actions that constitute violations, the lawsuit argues, include "collecting payments from foreign diplomats who stay in his hotels and accepting trademark approvals from foreign governments for his company's goods and services," the Times reported.
The lawsuit says, in part:
Because [President Trump] is not coming to Congress and identifying the emoluments he wishes to accept, the American people will have no way of knowing whether his actions as President reflect only his beliefs about what is best for the country, or whether they are partly motivated by personal financial considerations.
Blumenthal argued that because of the "unique role" the framers granted members of Congress, they have "standing [to sue] that no one else has."
In a statement released on Wednesday, Public Citizen applauded this latest move to hold the president accountable and to uncover elements of his business dealings that he has persistently refused to disclose.
"The framers were so attuned to the threat that corruption poses to a working democracy that they wrote anti-corruption measures into the nation's foundational document," said Public Citizen president Robert Weissman. "Unfortunately, we're now living with what will likely be known as the most corrupt administration in American history."
In the latest bid to hold Donald Trump to account for refusing to sufficiently distance himself from his business empire, nearly 200 congressional Democrats filed a lawsuit (pdf) on Wednesday alleging the president has "repeatedly and flagrantly" violated the Constitution's emoluments clause.
"Unfortunately, we're now living with what will likely be known as the most corrupt administration in American history."
--Robert Weissman, Public Citizen
"It is the third such lawsuit against Mr. Trump on the issue since he became president," the New York Times noted, "part of a coordinated effort by the president's critics to force him to reveal his business entanglements and either sell off his holdings or put them in a blind trust."
The Times added this is likely "the most members of Congress to ever sue a sitting president."
This suit comes shortly after attorneys general from Maryland and the District of Columbia announced that they, too, are suing Trump for what they called "unprecedented constitutional violations."
The lawmakers' suit makes similar charges, arguing the "gifts and benefits" the president's businesses have received from foreign leaders may have compelled him to "put personal interest over national interest."
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who is leading the effort, said the suit is a direct result of Trump's refusal to seek congressional approval for profits received from foreign governments, as required by the Emoluments Clause. Some of the president's actions that constitute violations, the lawsuit argues, include "collecting payments from foreign diplomats who stay in his hotels and accepting trademark approvals from foreign governments for his company's goods and services," the Times reported.
The lawsuit says, in part:
Because [President Trump] is not coming to Congress and identifying the emoluments he wishes to accept, the American people will have no way of knowing whether his actions as President reflect only his beliefs about what is best for the country, or whether they are partly motivated by personal financial considerations.
Blumenthal argued that because of the "unique role" the framers granted members of Congress, they have "standing [to sue] that no one else has."
In a statement released on Wednesday, Public Citizen applauded this latest move to hold the president accountable and to uncover elements of his business dealings that he has persistently refused to disclose.
"The framers were so attuned to the threat that corruption poses to a working democracy that they wrote anti-corruption measures into the nation's foundational document," said Public Citizen president Robert Weissman. "Unfortunately, we're now living with what will likely be known as the most corrupt administration in American history."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.