

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Legislation that would expand benefits for Social Security recipients while giving millions of seniors a tax break was re-introduced in the U.S. House on Wednesday, with support from over two-thirds of the Democratic caucus--and, its backers hope, from large swaths of the grassroots resistance movement.
Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) bill, the "Social Security 2100 Act" or H.R. 1902, bears more co-sponsors than any other previous proposal to expand Social Security.
It "gives lie to the myth that Social Security is going bankrupt and the only way to save it is by cutting benefits and raising the retirement age," said National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare president Max Richtman upon its unveiling. "This legislation asks the wealthy to start paying their fair share so that current and future retirees know that Social Security is there for them well into the future--solid, strong, and uncompromised."
According to Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would:
Nancy Altman, president of advocacy group Social Security Works (which was live-tweeting Wednesday's press conference), said the "landmark" legislation "wisely responds to several challenges facing the nation. These include a looming retirement income crisis, a growing squeeze on middle class families, and rising income inequality." Other groups present at the bill's introduction included disability rights organization The Arc, the non-profit Center for Global Policy Solutions, and Justice in Aging, which fights poverty among the elderly.
In a Facebook Live interview with the National Committee this week, Larson said he hopes the bill will ride the wave of grassroots energy that defeated the GOP healthcare plan last month.
"What we saw was people saying, 'Wait a minute, keep your hands off my healthcare'," he said. "It's the same with Social Security. We want to continue to build a groundswell in this country." Larson also noted, as others have for months, that President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to protect Social Security--and that voters will be paying attention to see if Trump and his team break that pledge.
Altman spoke to these political considerations on Wednesday:
The full list of 156 co-sponsors is here.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Legislation that would expand benefits for Social Security recipients while giving millions of seniors a tax break was re-introduced in the U.S. House on Wednesday, with support from over two-thirds of the Democratic caucus--and, its backers hope, from large swaths of the grassroots resistance movement.
Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) bill, the "Social Security 2100 Act" or H.R. 1902, bears more co-sponsors than any other previous proposal to expand Social Security.
It "gives lie to the myth that Social Security is going bankrupt and the only way to save it is by cutting benefits and raising the retirement age," said National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare president Max Richtman upon its unveiling. "This legislation asks the wealthy to start paying their fair share so that current and future retirees know that Social Security is there for them well into the future--solid, strong, and uncompromised."
According to Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would:
Nancy Altman, president of advocacy group Social Security Works (which was live-tweeting Wednesday's press conference), said the "landmark" legislation "wisely responds to several challenges facing the nation. These include a looming retirement income crisis, a growing squeeze on middle class families, and rising income inequality." Other groups present at the bill's introduction included disability rights organization The Arc, the non-profit Center for Global Policy Solutions, and Justice in Aging, which fights poverty among the elderly.
In a Facebook Live interview with the National Committee this week, Larson said he hopes the bill will ride the wave of grassroots energy that defeated the GOP healthcare plan last month.
"What we saw was people saying, 'Wait a minute, keep your hands off my healthcare'," he said. "It's the same with Social Security. We want to continue to build a groundswell in this country." Larson also noted, as others have for months, that President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to protect Social Security--and that voters will be paying attention to see if Trump and his team break that pledge.
Altman spoke to these political considerations on Wednesday:
The full list of 156 co-sponsors is here.
Legislation that would expand benefits for Social Security recipients while giving millions of seniors a tax break was re-introduced in the U.S. House on Wednesday, with support from over two-thirds of the Democratic caucus--and, its backers hope, from large swaths of the grassroots resistance movement.
Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) bill, the "Social Security 2100 Act" or H.R. 1902, bears more co-sponsors than any other previous proposal to expand Social Security.
It "gives lie to the myth that Social Security is going bankrupt and the only way to save it is by cutting benefits and raising the retirement age," said National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare president Max Richtman upon its unveiling. "This legislation asks the wealthy to start paying their fair share so that current and future retirees know that Social Security is there for them well into the future--solid, strong, and uncompromised."
According to Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would:
Nancy Altman, president of advocacy group Social Security Works (which was live-tweeting Wednesday's press conference), said the "landmark" legislation "wisely responds to several challenges facing the nation. These include a looming retirement income crisis, a growing squeeze on middle class families, and rising income inequality." Other groups present at the bill's introduction included disability rights organization The Arc, the non-profit Center for Global Policy Solutions, and Justice in Aging, which fights poverty among the elderly.
In a Facebook Live interview with the National Committee this week, Larson said he hopes the bill will ride the wave of grassroots energy that defeated the GOP healthcare plan last month.
"What we saw was people saying, 'Wait a minute, keep your hands off my healthcare'," he said. "It's the same with Social Security. We want to continue to build a groundswell in this country." Larson also noted, as others have for months, that President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to protect Social Security--and that voters will be paying attention to see if Trump and his team break that pledge.
Altman spoke to these political considerations on Wednesday:
The full list of 156 co-sponsors is here.