Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

The Social Security 2100 Act was described Wednesday as "not only for the people, it's of the people." (Photo: Reuters)

These 156 Lawmakers Support Expanding, Not Cutting, Social Security. Does Yours?

Bill to expand Social Security 'gives lie to the myth' that safety net program is going bankrupt

Deirdre Fulton

Legislation that would expand benefits for Social Security recipients while giving millions of seniors a tax break was re-introduced in the U.S. House on Wednesday, with support from over two-thirds of the Democratic caucus—and, its backers hope, from large swaths of the grassroots resistance movement.

Rep. John Larson's (D-Conn.) bill, the "Social Security 2100 Act" or H.R. 1902, bears more co-sponsors than any other previous proposal to expand Social Security.

It "gives lie to the myth that Social Security is going bankrupt and the only way to save it is by cutting benefits and raising the retirement age," said National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare president Max Richtman upon its unveiling. "This legislation asks the wealthy to start paying their fair share so that current and future retirees know that Social Security is there for them well into the future—solid, strong, and uncompromised."

According to Larson's office, Social Security 2100 would:

  • Provide an increase for all beneficiaries starting in 2018 that is the equivalent of 2 percent of the average benefit;
  • Improve the annual cost of living adjustment (COLA) formula to better reflect the costs incurred by seniors through adopting a [consumer price index for the elderly or CPI-E] formula;
  • Set the new minimum benefit will be at 25 percent above the poverty line and index it to wages to ensure that the minimum benefit does not fall behind;
  • Cut taxes for over 11 million Social Security beneficiaries;
  • Have millionaires and billionaires pay the same rate as everyone else by applying the payroll tax to wages above $400,000 (currently payroll taxes are not collected on wages over $127,200);
  • Gradually phase in an increase in the contribution rate beginning in 2019 so that by 2042, workers and employers would pay 7.4 percent (instead of 6.2 percent today).

Nancy Altman, president of advocacy group Social Security Works (which was live-tweeting Wednesday's press conference), said the "landmark" legislation "wisely responds to several challenges facing the nation. These include a looming retirement income crisis, a growing squeeze on middle class families, and rising income inequality." Other groups present at the bill's introduction included disability rights organization The Arc, the non-profit Center for Global Policy Solutions, and Justice in Aging, which fights poverty among the elderly.

In a Facebook Live interview with the National Committee this week, Larson said he hopes the bill will ride the wave of grassroots energy that defeated the GOP healthcare plan last month. 

"What we saw was people saying, 'Wait a minute, keep your hands off my healthcare'," he said. "It's the same with Social Security. We want to continue to build a groundswell in this country." Larson also noted, as others have for months, that President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to protect Social Security—and that voters will be paying attention to see if Trump and his team break that pledge.

Altman spoke to these political considerations on Wednesday:

The full list of 156 co-sponsors is here.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'Bloodbath': At Least 6 Dead, Dozens Wounded in Mass Shooting at Illinois July 4th Parade

"What freedom do we have if we fear being gunned down at a parade?" asked one progressive politician horrified by the reported carnage.

Brett Wilkins ·

On This July 4th, Abortion Rights Movement Says 'We're Not in the Mood for Fireworks'

"If we don’t have the ability to make decisions about if, when, and how to grow our families—we don't have freedom."

Brett Wilkins ·

Deadly Glacier Collapse in Italy 'Linked Directly to Climate Change'

At least seven people were killed when a glacier slid down a mountainside near a popular climbing route in the Alps on Sunday.

Julia Conley ·

'Organized Whitewash': US Claims Israeli Military's Murder of Journalist Not Intentional

"The odds that those responsible for the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh will be held to account are all but nonexistent," said the human rights group B'Tselem in response to findings of U.S. State Department.

Brett Wilkins ·

Hundreds March in Akron Enraged by Police Killing of Jayland Walker

"The police can do whatever they want," said one local resident through tears. "They can take our children's lives and think it's okay."

Julia Conley ·

Common Dreams Logo