

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.
May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.
The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act--the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR--with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.
While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.
As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."
"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.
The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.
Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."
May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."
"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.
May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.
The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act--the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR--with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.
While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.
As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."
"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.
The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.
Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."
May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."
"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."
British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.
May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.
The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act--the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR--with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.
While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.
As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."
"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.
The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.
Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."
May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."
"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."