"With this action," says ACLU, "the U.S. is on the right path to protect Muslim and Arab immigrants from discrimination." (Image: ACLU)
Dec 22, 2016
With a President Donald Trump on the horizon, civil liberties advocates applauded President Barack Obama on Thursday after his administration announced the end of a federal registration program for Muslim and Arab immigrants.
Established by the George W. Bush administration in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) was criticized since its inception as regressive attempt to profile individuals based on their national heritage and religion.
Though the provision has been dormant since enforcement of it was blocked in 2011, Thursday's announcement signals the government's official cancellation of the policy. According to a statement by the Department of Homeland Security, "the regulatory structure pertaining to NSEERS no longer provides a discernible public benefit as the program has been rendered obsolete."
Though the ACLU long argued the program never offered a "discernible public benefit," the group welcomed the announcement.
"NSEERS was a completely failed counter-terrorism tool and massive profiling program that didn't yield a single terrorism conviction in nearly a decade," said Joanne Lin, ACLU senior legislative counsel. "The ACLU applauds the Obama administration for terminating NSEERS for good. With this action, the U.S. is on the right path to protect Muslim and Arab immigrants from discrimination."
The move by the outgoing president appears to be the latest counter-measure against President-elect Trump, who made the establishment of a Muslim registry a cornerstone of his campaign.
In a recent post for the ACLU's blog, Lin said the NSEERS framework would be especially dangerous in Trump's hand.
"The President-elect has promised on multiple occasions to target Muslim immigrants for "extreme vetting"--a truly terrifying prospect. In 2017, he could make this threat a reality by activating the dormant National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) program with the flip of a switch," she wrote.
Lin described the program as "not only discriminatory and dangerous" but "completely ineffective" as a security measure. "In its nearly 10 years of operation, NSEERS did not produce a single terrorism conviction. Even the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security -- the department's watchdog -- said the program was unreliable and a waste of taxpayers' money."
Despite that--as Common Dreams reported last month--Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the original law and has been an advisor to Trump's transition team, specifically cited NSEERS as a tool that could be resurrected by the President-elect.
Though it may not prevent Trump from establishing some other form of registration program for Muslim immigrants or refugees, there is at least one less tool at his disposal for such efforts.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With a President Donald Trump on the horizon, civil liberties advocates applauded President Barack Obama on Thursday after his administration announced the end of a federal registration program for Muslim and Arab immigrants.
Established by the George W. Bush administration in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) was criticized since its inception as regressive attempt to profile individuals based on their national heritage and religion.
Though the provision has been dormant since enforcement of it was blocked in 2011, Thursday's announcement signals the government's official cancellation of the policy. According to a statement by the Department of Homeland Security, "the regulatory structure pertaining to NSEERS no longer provides a discernible public benefit as the program has been rendered obsolete."
Though the ACLU long argued the program never offered a "discernible public benefit," the group welcomed the announcement.
"NSEERS was a completely failed counter-terrorism tool and massive profiling program that didn't yield a single terrorism conviction in nearly a decade," said Joanne Lin, ACLU senior legislative counsel. "The ACLU applauds the Obama administration for terminating NSEERS for good. With this action, the U.S. is on the right path to protect Muslim and Arab immigrants from discrimination."
The move by the outgoing president appears to be the latest counter-measure against President-elect Trump, who made the establishment of a Muslim registry a cornerstone of his campaign.
In a recent post for the ACLU's blog, Lin said the NSEERS framework would be especially dangerous in Trump's hand.
"The President-elect has promised on multiple occasions to target Muslim immigrants for "extreme vetting"--a truly terrifying prospect. In 2017, he could make this threat a reality by activating the dormant National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) program with the flip of a switch," she wrote.
Lin described the program as "not only discriminatory and dangerous" but "completely ineffective" as a security measure. "In its nearly 10 years of operation, NSEERS did not produce a single terrorism conviction. Even the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security -- the department's watchdog -- said the program was unreliable and a waste of taxpayers' money."
Despite that--as Common Dreams reported last month--Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the original law and has been an advisor to Trump's transition team, specifically cited NSEERS as a tool that could be resurrected by the President-elect.
Though it may not prevent Trump from establishing some other form of registration program for Muslim immigrants or refugees, there is at least one less tool at his disposal for such efforts.
With a President Donald Trump on the horizon, civil liberties advocates applauded President Barack Obama on Thursday after his administration announced the end of a federal registration program for Muslim and Arab immigrants.
Established by the George W. Bush administration in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) was criticized since its inception as regressive attempt to profile individuals based on their national heritage and religion.
Though the provision has been dormant since enforcement of it was blocked in 2011, Thursday's announcement signals the government's official cancellation of the policy. According to a statement by the Department of Homeland Security, "the regulatory structure pertaining to NSEERS no longer provides a discernible public benefit as the program has been rendered obsolete."
Though the ACLU long argued the program never offered a "discernible public benefit," the group welcomed the announcement.
"NSEERS was a completely failed counter-terrorism tool and massive profiling program that didn't yield a single terrorism conviction in nearly a decade," said Joanne Lin, ACLU senior legislative counsel. "The ACLU applauds the Obama administration for terminating NSEERS for good. With this action, the U.S. is on the right path to protect Muslim and Arab immigrants from discrimination."
The move by the outgoing president appears to be the latest counter-measure against President-elect Trump, who made the establishment of a Muslim registry a cornerstone of his campaign.
In a recent post for the ACLU's blog, Lin said the NSEERS framework would be especially dangerous in Trump's hand.
"The President-elect has promised on multiple occasions to target Muslim immigrants for "extreme vetting"--a truly terrifying prospect. In 2017, he could make this threat a reality by activating the dormant National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) program with the flip of a switch," she wrote.
Lin described the program as "not only discriminatory and dangerous" but "completely ineffective" as a security measure. "In its nearly 10 years of operation, NSEERS did not produce a single terrorism conviction. Even the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security -- the department's watchdog -- said the program was unreliable and a waste of taxpayers' money."
Despite that--as Common Dreams reported last month--Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped draft the original law and has been an advisor to Trump's transition team, specifically cited NSEERS as a tool that could be resurrected by the President-elect.
Though it may not prevent Trump from establishing some other form of registration program for Muslim immigrants or refugees, there is at least one less tool at his disposal for such efforts.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.