SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Iran's Alvand warship, one of two reportedly deployed on Thursday. (Photo: ThereAreNoSunglasses.wordpress.com)
Iran reportedly sent two warships to the Gulf of Aden on Thursday, following news of the first-ever U.S. cruise missile strikes on Iran-backed Houthis late Wednesday.
The republic's naval commander confirmed that two naval destroyers had been deployed off the Yemeni coast "to protect trade vessels," as the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported.
RT reports that the commander, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari, "dismissed claims the fleet has been deployed to intervene in the conflict in Yemen."
But given that "[m]any see the Yemen conflict as a proxy war between the Middle East's two main rivals, Saudi Arabia and Iran, and their western or regional backers," as the Guardian put it on Thursday, the latest development could further ratchet up tensions in the region.
Indeed, Stephen Seche, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Yemen from 2007 to 2010, told the newspaper in response to the U.S. escalation: "It's not at all a stretch of the imagination, to my mind, that the Iranians benefit from seeing the U.S. drawn into this."
But Peter Cook, the Pentagon press secretary, on Thursday said that despite the missile attacks on Yemen, the U.S. military is not interested in expanding its involvement in the war.
"We don't seek a wider role in this conflict," Cook said, claiming the strikes were a limited reprisal to defend the USS Mason and freedom of navigation in the Bab al-Mandeb waterway, "not connected to the broader conflict in Yemen."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Iran reportedly sent two warships to the Gulf of Aden on Thursday, following news of the first-ever U.S. cruise missile strikes on Iran-backed Houthis late Wednesday.
The republic's naval commander confirmed that two naval destroyers had been deployed off the Yemeni coast "to protect trade vessels," as the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported.
RT reports that the commander, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari, "dismissed claims the fleet has been deployed to intervene in the conflict in Yemen."
But given that "[m]any see the Yemen conflict as a proxy war between the Middle East's two main rivals, Saudi Arabia and Iran, and their western or regional backers," as the Guardian put it on Thursday, the latest development could further ratchet up tensions in the region.
Indeed, Stephen Seche, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Yemen from 2007 to 2010, told the newspaper in response to the U.S. escalation: "It's not at all a stretch of the imagination, to my mind, that the Iranians benefit from seeing the U.S. drawn into this."
But Peter Cook, the Pentagon press secretary, on Thursday said that despite the missile attacks on Yemen, the U.S. military is not interested in expanding its involvement in the war.
"We don't seek a wider role in this conflict," Cook said, claiming the strikes were a limited reprisal to defend the USS Mason and freedom of navigation in the Bab al-Mandeb waterway, "not connected to the broader conflict in Yemen."
Iran reportedly sent two warships to the Gulf of Aden on Thursday, following news of the first-ever U.S. cruise missile strikes on Iran-backed Houthis late Wednesday.
The republic's naval commander confirmed that two naval destroyers had been deployed off the Yemeni coast "to protect trade vessels," as the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported.
RT reports that the commander, Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari, "dismissed claims the fleet has been deployed to intervene in the conflict in Yemen."
But given that "[m]any see the Yemen conflict as a proxy war between the Middle East's two main rivals, Saudi Arabia and Iran, and their western or regional backers," as the Guardian put it on Thursday, the latest development could further ratchet up tensions in the region.
Indeed, Stephen Seche, who served as the U.S. ambassador to Yemen from 2007 to 2010, told the newspaper in response to the U.S. escalation: "It's not at all a stretch of the imagination, to my mind, that the Iranians benefit from seeing the U.S. drawn into this."
But Peter Cook, the Pentagon press secretary, on Thursday said that despite the missile attacks on Yemen, the U.S. military is not interested in expanding its involvement in the war.
"We don't seek a wider role in this conflict," Cook said, claiming the strikes were a limited reprisal to defend the USS Mason and freedom of navigation in the Bab al-Mandeb waterway, "not connected to the broader conflict in Yemen."