SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Texas Women Strike Back Against State-Mandated Abortion 'Propaganda'
Booklet given to women seeking abortion uses 'your baby' when describing gestation development as early as four weeks, rather than medical terms, such as 'fetus'
Jul 28, 2016
Women's health advocates in Texas are outraged over the contents of a misleading and state-mandated booklet that's handed out to women seeking an abortion.
According to the Austin Chronicle, "The error-ridden pamphlet, created by a 2003 abortion informed consent law, has been criticized for years for its myriad of medical inaccuracies and biased, ideologically-motivated misinformation, such as linking abortion and breast cancer (debunked by the National Cancer Institute), and promoting the idea that abortion inflicts psychological trauma and suicide, which is not recognized by the American Psychological Association."
Now, the Department of State Health Services has proposed several revisions to the booklet, titled A Woman's Right to Know, and is accepting public comments on the updates until Friday.
But according to the Texas Tribune, "The new draft doubles down on information highly contested by medical experts and the pro-abortion rights community, stoking the flames of a debate going back more than a decade."
The Tribune reports:
Among major changes, the new draft uses "your baby" when describing gestation development as early as four weeks, rather than medical terms, such as "fetus." The new version also highlights the suggestion that fetuses can begin feeling pain at 20 weeks--a claim contested by scientists--and displays risks associated with abortion more prominently, with death first on the list.
To that end, reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday delivered thousands of comments in opposition to the booklet and its revisions.
"This is just the latest shameful example of state leaders playing politics with women's health," Texas state representative Donna Howard said at a press conference held by NARAL Pro-Choice Texas.
Decrying the pamphlet as "propaganda," Howard said: "As a former registered nurse, I find it outrageous that the state requires health professionals to provide misleading and coercive information to patients."
The U.S. Supreme Court last month struck down key provisions of Texas' draconian 2013 law that would have forced all but nine abortion clinics in the state to close.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Women's health advocates in Texas are outraged over the contents of a misleading and state-mandated booklet that's handed out to women seeking an abortion.
According to the Austin Chronicle, "The error-ridden pamphlet, created by a 2003 abortion informed consent law, has been criticized for years for its myriad of medical inaccuracies and biased, ideologically-motivated misinformation, such as linking abortion and breast cancer (debunked by the National Cancer Institute), and promoting the idea that abortion inflicts psychological trauma and suicide, which is not recognized by the American Psychological Association."
Now, the Department of State Health Services has proposed several revisions to the booklet, titled A Woman's Right to Know, and is accepting public comments on the updates until Friday.
But according to the Texas Tribune, "The new draft doubles down on information highly contested by medical experts and the pro-abortion rights community, stoking the flames of a debate going back more than a decade."
The Tribune reports:
Among major changes, the new draft uses "your baby" when describing gestation development as early as four weeks, rather than medical terms, such as "fetus." The new version also highlights the suggestion that fetuses can begin feeling pain at 20 weeks--a claim contested by scientists--and displays risks associated with abortion more prominently, with death first on the list.
To that end, reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday delivered thousands of comments in opposition to the booklet and its revisions.
"This is just the latest shameful example of state leaders playing politics with women's health," Texas state representative Donna Howard said at a press conference held by NARAL Pro-Choice Texas.
Decrying the pamphlet as "propaganda," Howard said: "As a former registered nurse, I find it outrageous that the state requires health professionals to provide misleading and coercive information to patients."
The U.S. Supreme Court last month struck down key provisions of Texas' draconian 2013 law that would have forced all but nine abortion clinics in the state to close.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Women's health advocates in Texas are outraged over the contents of a misleading and state-mandated booklet that's handed out to women seeking an abortion.
According to the Austin Chronicle, "The error-ridden pamphlet, created by a 2003 abortion informed consent law, has been criticized for years for its myriad of medical inaccuracies and biased, ideologically-motivated misinformation, such as linking abortion and breast cancer (debunked by the National Cancer Institute), and promoting the idea that abortion inflicts psychological trauma and suicide, which is not recognized by the American Psychological Association."
Now, the Department of State Health Services has proposed several revisions to the booklet, titled A Woman's Right to Know, and is accepting public comments on the updates until Friday.
But according to the Texas Tribune, "The new draft doubles down on information highly contested by medical experts and the pro-abortion rights community, stoking the flames of a debate going back more than a decade."
The Tribune reports:
Among major changes, the new draft uses "your baby" when describing gestation development as early as four weeks, rather than medical terms, such as "fetus." The new version also highlights the suggestion that fetuses can begin feeling pain at 20 weeks--a claim contested by scientists--and displays risks associated with abortion more prominently, with death first on the list.
To that end, reproductive rights advocates on Wednesday delivered thousands of comments in opposition to the booklet and its revisions.
"This is just the latest shameful example of state leaders playing politics with women's health," Texas state representative Donna Howard said at a press conference held by NARAL Pro-Choice Texas.
Decrying the pamphlet as "propaganda," Howard said: "As a former registered nurse, I find it outrageous that the state requires health professionals to provide misleading and coercive information to patients."
The U.S. Supreme Court last month struck down key provisions of Texas' draconian 2013 law that would have forced all but nine abortion clinics in the state to close.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.