SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Whistleblowers: Nuke Watchdogs Not Doing Enough to Prevent Canadian Fukushima
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue. That's a safety culture issue."
Jul 20, 2016
Anonymous whistleblowers have reportedly raised the alarm over nuclear safety in Canada, with an open letter warning of underestimated hazards and undisclosed risks that could make the nation vulnerable to a Fukushima-style disaster.
The letter, sent several weeks ago to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) president Michael Binder, was purportedly written by an internal group of specialists who opted for anonymity because they "are not confident in whistleblower protection."
On Tuesday, it was reported that federal officials would meet with Binder to discuss the letter's allegations. The CNSC also said this week it had "initiated a formal review" of the whistleblowers' claims.
According to the Globe and Mail, the missive "points to five separate cases in which the commission's staff sat on relevant material about risk or non-compliance that might have called the safety of a plant into question."
The Globe and Mail continues:
The letter says hazards have been underestimated, plant operators have been permitted to skip requirements of the licensing regime and assessments outlining what could happen in the event of a major-scale nuclear disaster--such as the one that occurred in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011--have been withheld from the commissioners and the public.
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue," Greenpeace Canada senior energy analyst Shawn-Patrick Stensil told the paper, referring to the allegation that CNSC staff is ignoring certain risks. "That's a safety culture issue."
Canada is home to five nuclear power plants in three provinces, which house 22 nuclear power reactors. Nuclear energy produces about 15 percent of Canada's electricity, according to the CNSC.
The National Observer notes:
The letter is much like one sent by 14 environmental organizations in March to Prime Minister Trudeau. Greenpeace Canada and the Canadian Environmental Law Association among others claimed that CNSC had been testing the "political environment" in 2015 before implementing changes needed to improve nuclear oversight.
They claimed that, under former prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada failed to keep pace with other nuclear powers in preparing the country for a Fukushima-style disaster.
"Our primary concern is that CNSC Commissioners do not receive sufficient information to make balanced judgments," the letter reads.
Indeed, in response to the news, the group Beyond Nuclear said it "can vouch, from extensive, direct experience, that CNSC staff's extreme bias in favor of nuclear power promotion is over the top."
Meanwhile, over the border in the U.S., an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity published this week shows how the U.S. Energy Department "lets its private contractors police themselves, producing 'chilled work environments' in which employees who find wrongdoing have no useful path for complaints."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Anonymous whistleblowers have reportedly raised the alarm over nuclear safety in Canada, with an open letter warning of underestimated hazards and undisclosed risks that could make the nation vulnerable to a Fukushima-style disaster.
The letter, sent several weeks ago to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) president Michael Binder, was purportedly written by an internal group of specialists who opted for anonymity because they "are not confident in whistleblower protection."
On Tuesday, it was reported that federal officials would meet with Binder to discuss the letter's allegations. The CNSC also said this week it had "initiated a formal review" of the whistleblowers' claims.
According to the Globe and Mail, the missive "points to five separate cases in which the commission's staff sat on relevant material about risk or non-compliance that might have called the safety of a plant into question."
The Globe and Mail continues:
The letter says hazards have been underestimated, plant operators have been permitted to skip requirements of the licensing regime and assessments outlining what could happen in the event of a major-scale nuclear disaster--such as the one that occurred in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011--have been withheld from the commissioners and the public.
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue," Greenpeace Canada senior energy analyst Shawn-Patrick Stensil told the paper, referring to the allegation that CNSC staff is ignoring certain risks. "That's a safety culture issue."
Canada is home to five nuclear power plants in three provinces, which house 22 nuclear power reactors. Nuclear energy produces about 15 percent of Canada's electricity, according to the CNSC.
The National Observer notes:
The letter is much like one sent by 14 environmental organizations in March to Prime Minister Trudeau. Greenpeace Canada and the Canadian Environmental Law Association among others claimed that CNSC had been testing the "political environment" in 2015 before implementing changes needed to improve nuclear oversight.
They claimed that, under former prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada failed to keep pace with other nuclear powers in preparing the country for a Fukushima-style disaster.
"Our primary concern is that CNSC Commissioners do not receive sufficient information to make balanced judgments," the letter reads.
Indeed, in response to the news, the group Beyond Nuclear said it "can vouch, from extensive, direct experience, that CNSC staff's extreme bias in favor of nuclear power promotion is over the top."
Meanwhile, over the border in the U.S., an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity published this week shows how the U.S. Energy Department "lets its private contractors police themselves, producing 'chilled work environments' in which employees who find wrongdoing have no useful path for complaints."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Anonymous whistleblowers have reportedly raised the alarm over nuclear safety in Canada, with an open letter warning of underestimated hazards and undisclosed risks that could make the nation vulnerable to a Fukushima-style disaster.
The letter, sent several weeks ago to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) president Michael Binder, was purportedly written by an internal group of specialists who opted for anonymity because they "are not confident in whistleblower protection."
On Tuesday, it was reported that federal officials would meet with Binder to discuss the letter's allegations. The CNSC also said this week it had "initiated a formal review" of the whistleblowers' claims.
According to the Globe and Mail, the missive "points to five separate cases in which the commission's staff sat on relevant material about risk or non-compliance that might have called the safety of a plant into question."
The Globe and Mail continues:
The letter says hazards have been underestimated, plant operators have been permitted to skip requirements of the licensing regime and assessments outlining what could happen in the event of a major-scale nuclear disaster--such as the one that occurred in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011--have been withheld from the commissioners and the public.
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue," Greenpeace Canada senior energy analyst Shawn-Patrick Stensil told the paper, referring to the allegation that CNSC staff is ignoring certain risks. "That's a safety culture issue."
Canada is home to five nuclear power plants in three provinces, which house 22 nuclear power reactors. Nuclear energy produces about 15 percent of Canada's electricity, according to the CNSC.
The National Observer notes:
The letter is much like one sent by 14 environmental organizations in March to Prime Minister Trudeau. Greenpeace Canada and the Canadian Environmental Law Association among others claimed that CNSC had been testing the "political environment" in 2015 before implementing changes needed to improve nuclear oversight.
They claimed that, under former prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada failed to keep pace with other nuclear powers in preparing the country for a Fukushima-style disaster.
"Our primary concern is that CNSC Commissioners do not receive sufficient information to make balanced judgments," the letter reads.
Indeed, in response to the news, the group Beyond Nuclear said it "can vouch, from extensive, direct experience, that CNSC staff's extreme bias in favor of nuclear power promotion is over the top."
Meanwhile, over the border in the U.S., an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity published this week shows how the U.S. Energy Department "lets its private contractors police themselves, producing 'chilled work environments' in which employees who find wrongdoing have no useful path for complaints."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.