SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Of Course' Hillary Clinton is Qualified to Be President, Sanders Clarifies
In attempt turn conversation backs towards issues voters care about, Sanders walks back charge levied earlier this week
Apr 08, 2016
Bernie Sanders on Friday clarified comments he made earlier this week questioning rival Hillary Clinton's qualifications to be president.
"The Clinton campaign has changed its tone" after losing seven of the past eight presidential nominating contests in the lead-up to the New York primary, Sanders told NBC's Today show.
"I've know Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I respect Hillary Clinton. We were colleagues in the Senate, and on her worst day, she would be an infinitely better president than either of the Republican candidates," he said. Asked directly by host Savannah Guthrie whether Clinton was qualified to be president, Sanders replied, "Of course."
The fresh comments mark a contrast from what Sanders' take has been over the past several days, stemming from what he saw as attacks on his own qualifications from the Clinton campaign.
On Wednesday night, hours after Clinton repeatedly did not directly answer Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough's question on whether Sanders was qualified, the Vermont senator sparked a media frenzy when he said at an event: "She has been saying lately that she thinks I am quote, unquote 'not qualified' to be president. I don't believe that she is qualified ... if she is, through her super PAC, taking tens of millions of dollars in special interests funds."
"I don't think that you are 'qualified' if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC," he said. "I don't think you are 'qualified' if you have voted for the disastrous war in Iraq. I don't think you are 'qualified' if you have supported virtually every disastrous trade agreement."
And on Thursday, Sanders defended his remarks on Clinton's capability to hold the office. Though he did not say she is unqualified, he told CBS This Morning host Charlie Rose, "I'm responding to attacks that are being made against me." He later added," If Secretary Clinton is the nominee, I will certainly support her."
He doubled down on the comments at a press conference Thursday, saying of his rival's campaign, "They're going to question my qualifications, well I'm going to question theirs."
Also on Friday, ahead of his Today show appearance, Sanders spoke to Morning Joe and described what he framed as an increasingly negative campaign by his rival.
Clinton, for her part, spoke to the Today show on Friday and said "she never said" Sanders had done anything that disqualifies him from being president. "His response to me was a misrepresentation of what I've said," Clinton said, adding, "There are contrasts between us. That's fair game."
According to reporting by CNN this week, however, that fits in with the Clinton campaign's "three-part strategy before the New York primary on April 19: Disqualify him, defeat him, and unify the party later."
And as Kevin Gosztola, managing editor of Shadowproof Press, argued this week, "Voters have yet to see the full scope of what the Clinton campaign will sling at Sanders," and wrote that "the Clinton campaign and media outlets like CNN promote a false narrative that the campaign has not been in attack mode. Since September, she has used a network of surrogates and rapid response super PACs to push anti-Sanders talking points into the media."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bernie Sanders on Friday clarified comments he made earlier this week questioning rival Hillary Clinton's qualifications to be president.
"The Clinton campaign has changed its tone" after losing seven of the past eight presidential nominating contests in the lead-up to the New York primary, Sanders told NBC's Today show.
"I've know Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I respect Hillary Clinton. We were colleagues in the Senate, and on her worst day, she would be an infinitely better president than either of the Republican candidates," he said. Asked directly by host Savannah Guthrie whether Clinton was qualified to be president, Sanders replied, "Of course."
The fresh comments mark a contrast from what Sanders' take has been over the past several days, stemming from what he saw as attacks on his own qualifications from the Clinton campaign.
On Wednesday night, hours after Clinton repeatedly did not directly answer Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough's question on whether Sanders was qualified, the Vermont senator sparked a media frenzy when he said at an event: "She has been saying lately that she thinks I am quote, unquote 'not qualified' to be president. I don't believe that she is qualified ... if she is, through her super PAC, taking tens of millions of dollars in special interests funds."
"I don't think that you are 'qualified' if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC," he said. "I don't think you are 'qualified' if you have voted for the disastrous war in Iraq. I don't think you are 'qualified' if you have supported virtually every disastrous trade agreement."
And on Thursday, Sanders defended his remarks on Clinton's capability to hold the office. Though he did not say she is unqualified, he told CBS This Morning host Charlie Rose, "I'm responding to attacks that are being made against me." He later added," If Secretary Clinton is the nominee, I will certainly support her."
He doubled down on the comments at a press conference Thursday, saying of his rival's campaign, "They're going to question my qualifications, well I'm going to question theirs."
Also on Friday, ahead of his Today show appearance, Sanders spoke to Morning Joe and described what he framed as an increasingly negative campaign by his rival.
Clinton, for her part, spoke to the Today show on Friday and said "she never said" Sanders had done anything that disqualifies him from being president. "His response to me was a misrepresentation of what I've said," Clinton said, adding, "There are contrasts between us. That's fair game."
According to reporting by CNN this week, however, that fits in with the Clinton campaign's "three-part strategy before the New York primary on April 19: Disqualify him, defeat him, and unify the party later."
And as Kevin Gosztola, managing editor of Shadowproof Press, argued this week, "Voters have yet to see the full scope of what the Clinton campaign will sling at Sanders," and wrote that "the Clinton campaign and media outlets like CNN promote a false narrative that the campaign has not been in attack mode. Since September, she has used a network of surrogates and rapid response super PACs to push anti-Sanders talking points into the media."
Bernie Sanders on Friday clarified comments he made earlier this week questioning rival Hillary Clinton's qualifications to be president.
"The Clinton campaign has changed its tone" after losing seven of the past eight presidential nominating contests in the lead-up to the New York primary, Sanders told NBC's Today show.
"I've know Hillary Clinton for 25 years. I respect Hillary Clinton. We were colleagues in the Senate, and on her worst day, she would be an infinitely better president than either of the Republican candidates," he said. Asked directly by host Savannah Guthrie whether Clinton was qualified to be president, Sanders replied, "Of course."
The fresh comments mark a contrast from what Sanders' take has been over the past several days, stemming from what he saw as attacks on his own qualifications from the Clinton campaign.
On Wednesday night, hours after Clinton repeatedly did not directly answer Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough's question on whether Sanders was qualified, the Vermont senator sparked a media frenzy when he said at an event: "She has been saying lately that she thinks I am quote, unquote 'not qualified' to be president. I don't believe that she is qualified ... if she is, through her super PAC, taking tens of millions of dollars in special interests funds."
"I don't think that you are 'qualified' if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC," he said. "I don't think you are 'qualified' if you have voted for the disastrous war in Iraq. I don't think you are 'qualified' if you have supported virtually every disastrous trade agreement."
And on Thursday, Sanders defended his remarks on Clinton's capability to hold the office. Though he did not say she is unqualified, he told CBS This Morning host Charlie Rose, "I'm responding to attacks that are being made against me." He later added," If Secretary Clinton is the nominee, I will certainly support her."
He doubled down on the comments at a press conference Thursday, saying of his rival's campaign, "They're going to question my qualifications, well I'm going to question theirs."
Also on Friday, ahead of his Today show appearance, Sanders spoke to Morning Joe and described what he framed as an increasingly negative campaign by his rival.
Clinton, for her part, spoke to the Today show on Friday and said "she never said" Sanders had done anything that disqualifies him from being president. "His response to me was a misrepresentation of what I've said," Clinton said, adding, "There are contrasts between us. That's fair game."
According to reporting by CNN this week, however, that fits in with the Clinton campaign's "three-part strategy before the New York primary on April 19: Disqualify him, defeat him, and unify the party later."
And as Kevin Gosztola, managing editor of Shadowproof Press, argued this week, "Voters have yet to see the full scope of what the Clinton campaign will sling at Sanders," and wrote that "the Clinton campaign and media outlets like CNN promote a false narrative that the campaign has not been in attack mode. Since September, she has used a network of surrogates and rapid response super PACs to push anti-Sanders talking points into the media."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.