Striking Analysis of Civil Rights Complaints Sheds Light on Why Police Impunity Reigns

Published on
by

Striking Analysis of Civil Rights Complaints Sheds Light on Why Police Impunity Reigns

Newspaper investigation reveals that federal prosecutors failed to pursue civil rights complaints against police officers 96 percent of cases

 

The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture. (Photo: Thomas Hawk/cc/flickr)

The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture. (Photo: Thomas Hawk/cc/flickr)

A striking new analysis published this weekend found that federal prosecutors failed to pursue civil rights complaints against police officers a full 96 percent of the time.

The investigation, conducted by Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporters Brian Bowling and Andrew Conte, examined 3 million federal records regarding criminal complaints against law enforcement from 1995 through 2015. The findings come against a backdrop of increased attention on police misconduct, including evidence of racial discrimination, unlawful shootings, surveillance, imprisonment, and torture.

Bowling and Conte uncovered "12,703 potential civil rights violations turned down nationwide out of 13,233 total complaints," including "high-profile incidents in Ferguson, Mo., Chicago and New York City."

In comparison, the Department of Justice rejected roughly 23 percent of complaints for other crimes.

"The most frequent reasons cited for declining civil rights complaints involving officers: weak or insufficient evidence, lack of criminal intent required under a 1945 Supreme Court ruling standard, and orders from the Justice Department," Bowling and Conte report. 

Craig Futterman, a law professor who founded the Civil Rights and Police Accountability Project at the University of Chicago, told the Tribune that "the failure to aggressively bring those cases has allowed too many abusive officers to believe that they can operate without fear of punishment."

The difficulty, according to legal experts, with charging a police officer with a civil rights complaint is proving that they had acted "willfully," as established in a 1945 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. But, as Futterman argues, "Just because they're challenging cases should not mean they should not be brought."

The reporting continues:

 U.S. attorneys nationwide generally have the authority to decline referrals on their own. In civil rights cases when an officer has killed someone, when the case has been tried in a local court or has gained national notoriety, U.S. attorneys must coordinate with the assistant attorney general for civil rights in Washington, who has the final decision. 

During the Obama administration, federal prosecutors have declined referrals for civil rights prosecution of officers 93 percent of the time.  The “willful” standard is too high, former Attorney General Eric Holder said last year. He talked about recommending changes before leaving office but did not. 

Now in private practice at Covington & Burling's Washington office, Holder declined a Trib request for an interview.

The analysis was released as the first installment of a series about prosecuting police.

Share This Article