SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Apple Warns FBI Could Make Them Turn On iPhone Cameras and Microphones Next
'When they can get us to create a new system to do new things, where will it stop?'
Mar 10, 2016
If the FBI successfully manages to force Apple to unlock the suspected San Bernardino shooter's iPhone, the government could use the precedent to require the tech company to remotely turn on users' iPhone microphones and cameras, Apple's senior vice president warned this week.
Eddy Cue, speaking to Univision in a Spanish-language interview, reiterated Apple's argument that its case against the FBI is not just about one phone or one suspect, but rather an issue of user privacy.
"When they can get us to create a new system to do new things, where will it stop?" Cue said, according to a translation provided to Business Insider. "For example, one day [the FBI] may want us to open your phone's camera or microphone. Those are things we can't do now. But if they can force us to do that, I think that's very bad."
"Where will this stop?" Cue continued. "In a divorce case? In an immigration case? In a tax case? Some day, someone will be able to turn on a phone's microphone. That should not happen in this country."
The interview comes as the FBI continues its efforts to compel Apple to create new software that would enable the agency to break into the encrypted iPhone of suspected San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook, which Apple has refused to do on privacy grounds.
Cue noted that the tech company has not resisted helping the FBI altogether, and continues to give the government "all the data we have."
"In this case, the problem is that they want us to give the one thing that we do not have," he said. "What they want is for us to provide a key to the backdoor of your house, but we do not have the key. Since we don't have the key, they want us to change the lock. When we change the latchkey, it changes for everyone. And we then have a key capable of opening all phones. And that key, once it exists, exists not only for us. Terrorists, criminals, pirates, they too will be able to find and use that key to open all phones."
Apple has picked up support throughout the tech industry, as well as from privacy advocates and users. On Wednesday, whistleblower Edward Snowden said during a democracy conference that the FBI's claim that it can't unlock Farook's iPhone without Apple's help, "respectfully, [is] bullshit."
The United Nations human rights chief Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein also said last week that forcing Apple to create decryption software could unlock "a Pandora's Box that could have extremely damaging implications for the human rights of many millions of people, including their physical and financial security."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
If the FBI successfully manages to force Apple to unlock the suspected San Bernardino shooter's iPhone, the government could use the precedent to require the tech company to remotely turn on users' iPhone microphones and cameras, Apple's senior vice president warned this week.
Eddy Cue, speaking to Univision in a Spanish-language interview, reiterated Apple's argument that its case against the FBI is not just about one phone or one suspect, but rather an issue of user privacy.
"When they can get us to create a new system to do new things, where will it stop?" Cue said, according to a translation provided to Business Insider. "For example, one day [the FBI] may want us to open your phone's camera or microphone. Those are things we can't do now. But if they can force us to do that, I think that's very bad."
"Where will this stop?" Cue continued. "In a divorce case? In an immigration case? In a tax case? Some day, someone will be able to turn on a phone's microphone. That should not happen in this country."
The interview comes as the FBI continues its efforts to compel Apple to create new software that would enable the agency to break into the encrypted iPhone of suspected San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook, which Apple has refused to do on privacy grounds.
Cue noted that the tech company has not resisted helping the FBI altogether, and continues to give the government "all the data we have."
"In this case, the problem is that they want us to give the one thing that we do not have," he said. "What they want is for us to provide a key to the backdoor of your house, but we do not have the key. Since we don't have the key, they want us to change the lock. When we change the latchkey, it changes for everyone. And we then have a key capable of opening all phones. And that key, once it exists, exists not only for us. Terrorists, criminals, pirates, they too will be able to find and use that key to open all phones."
Apple has picked up support throughout the tech industry, as well as from privacy advocates and users. On Wednesday, whistleblower Edward Snowden said during a democracy conference that the FBI's claim that it can't unlock Farook's iPhone without Apple's help, "respectfully, [is] bullshit."
The United Nations human rights chief Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein also said last week that forcing Apple to create decryption software could unlock "a Pandora's Box that could have extremely damaging implications for the human rights of many millions of people, including their physical and financial security."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
If the FBI successfully manages to force Apple to unlock the suspected San Bernardino shooter's iPhone, the government could use the precedent to require the tech company to remotely turn on users' iPhone microphones and cameras, Apple's senior vice president warned this week.
Eddy Cue, speaking to Univision in a Spanish-language interview, reiterated Apple's argument that its case against the FBI is not just about one phone or one suspect, but rather an issue of user privacy.
"When they can get us to create a new system to do new things, where will it stop?" Cue said, according to a translation provided to Business Insider. "For example, one day [the FBI] may want us to open your phone's camera or microphone. Those are things we can't do now. But if they can force us to do that, I think that's very bad."
"Where will this stop?" Cue continued. "In a divorce case? In an immigration case? In a tax case? Some day, someone will be able to turn on a phone's microphone. That should not happen in this country."
The interview comes as the FBI continues its efforts to compel Apple to create new software that would enable the agency to break into the encrypted iPhone of suspected San Bernardino shooter Syed Farook, which Apple has refused to do on privacy grounds.
Cue noted that the tech company has not resisted helping the FBI altogether, and continues to give the government "all the data we have."
"In this case, the problem is that they want us to give the one thing that we do not have," he said. "What they want is for us to provide a key to the backdoor of your house, but we do not have the key. Since we don't have the key, they want us to change the lock. When we change the latchkey, it changes for everyone. And we then have a key capable of opening all phones. And that key, once it exists, exists not only for us. Terrorists, criminals, pirates, they too will be able to find and use that key to open all phones."
Apple has picked up support throughout the tech industry, as well as from privacy advocates and users. On Wednesday, whistleblower Edward Snowden said during a democracy conference that the FBI's claim that it can't unlock Farook's iPhone without Apple's help, "respectfully, [is] bullshit."
The United Nations human rights chief Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein also said last week that forcing Apple to create decryption software could unlock "a Pandora's Box that could have extremely damaging implications for the human rights of many millions of people, including their physical and financial security."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.