SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Pro-Palestine and anti-Israel demonstrators protesting against the Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Britain, in front of Downing Street in London. (Photo: AP)
The British government's move to outlaw boycotts, including those aimed at Israel, is being likened by critics to former Prime Minster Margaret Thatcher's support for apartheid South Africa.
Under the new plan, publicly-funded institutions that refuse to purchase goods and services from "unethical" companies will face "severe penalties," senior government sources told the Independent. The prohibition protects any company that is signatory to the World Trade Organization government procurement agreement, including those "involved in the arms trade, fossil fuels, tobacco products or Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank."
Though details of the plan were first revealed in October, the Independent reports, "Significantly, and underlining the main target of the ban, the formal announcement will be made by the Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock when he visits Israel this week."
Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn is among those who has voiced opposition to the proposal, which he said amounts to an attack on local democracy.
"The Government's decision to ban councils and other public bodies from divesting from trade or investments they regard as unethical is an attack on local democracy," a Corbyn spokesperson told the press. "People have the right to elect local representatives able to make decisions free of central government political control. That includes withdrawal of investments or procurement on ethical and human rights grounds," the statement continued.
In practice, the ban imposes "Conservative Party policies on elected local councils across the board," Corbyn added, noting that the ban "would have outlawed council action against apartheid South Africa."
Rafeef Ziadah, a UK spokesperson for the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) National Committee, said the ban will likely only strengthen the resolve to protest "unethical" activities and leave the UK government, once again, on the "wrong side of history."
"By undermining local democracy in service of Israel, [Prime Minister] David Cameron is standing on the wrong side of history just as Margaret Thatcher did with her support for apartheid South Africa," Ziadah said.
"Far from thwarting the growing public support for the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality, these measures simply shine a spotlight on the UK's deepening support for Israel's oppression of Palestinians."
The growing BDS campaign has increasingly been targeted by leaders of Israel-allied nations--including the UK, the United States, and Canada--which organizers say is evidence of its growing impact.
Councils in the UK hamlets of Leicester, Swansea, and Bristol are among the local bodies that recently passed resolutions in support of BDS or condemning companies involved in illegal Israeli settlements, though a number of those motions were non-binding and now threaten to be superseded.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The British government's move to outlaw boycotts, including those aimed at Israel, is being likened by critics to former Prime Minster Margaret Thatcher's support for apartheid South Africa.
Under the new plan, publicly-funded institutions that refuse to purchase goods and services from "unethical" companies will face "severe penalties," senior government sources told the Independent. The prohibition protects any company that is signatory to the World Trade Organization government procurement agreement, including those "involved in the arms trade, fossil fuels, tobacco products or Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank."
Though details of the plan were first revealed in October, the Independent reports, "Significantly, and underlining the main target of the ban, the formal announcement will be made by the Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock when he visits Israel this week."
Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn is among those who has voiced opposition to the proposal, which he said amounts to an attack on local democracy.
"The Government's decision to ban councils and other public bodies from divesting from trade or investments they regard as unethical is an attack on local democracy," a Corbyn spokesperson told the press. "People have the right to elect local representatives able to make decisions free of central government political control. That includes withdrawal of investments or procurement on ethical and human rights grounds," the statement continued.
In practice, the ban imposes "Conservative Party policies on elected local councils across the board," Corbyn added, noting that the ban "would have outlawed council action against apartheid South Africa."
Rafeef Ziadah, a UK spokesperson for the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) National Committee, said the ban will likely only strengthen the resolve to protest "unethical" activities and leave the UK government, once again, on the "wrong side of history."
"By undermining local democracy in service of Israel, [Prime Minister] David Cameron is standing on the wrong side of history just as Margaret Thatcher did with her support for apartheid South Africa," Ziadah said.
"Far from thwarting the growing public support for the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality, these measures simply shine a spotlight on the UK's deepening support for Israel's oppression of Palestinians."
The growing BDS campaign has increasingly been targeted by leaders of Israel-allied nations--including the UK, the United States, and Canada--which organizers say is evidence of its growing impact.
Councils in the UK hamlets of Leicester, Swansea, and Bristol are among the local bodies that recently passed resolutions in support of BDS or condemning companies involved in illegal Israeli settlements, though a number of those motions were non-binding and now threaten to be superseded.
The British government's move to outlaw boycotts, including those aimed at Israel, is being likened by critics to former Prime Minster Margaret Thatcher's support for apartheid South Africa.
Under the new plan, publicly-funded institutions that refuse to purchase goods and services from "unethical" companies will face "severe penalties," senior government sources told the Independent. The prohibition protects any company that is signatory to the World Trade Organization government procurement agreement, including those "involved in the arms trade, fossil fuels, tobacco products or Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank."
Though details of the plan were first revealed in October, the Independent reports, "Significantly, and underlining the main target of the ban, the formal announcement will be made by the Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock when he visits Israel this week."
Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn is among those who has voiced opposition to the proposal, which he said amounts to an attack on local democracy.
"The Government's decision to ban councils and other public bodies from divesting from trade or investments they regard as unethical is an attack on local democracy," a Corbyn spokesperson told the press. "People have the right to elect local representatives able to make decisions free of central government political control. That includes withdrawal of investments or procurement on ethical and human rights grounds," the statement continued.
In practice, the ban imposes "Conservative Party policies on elected local councils across the board," Corbyn added, noting that the ban "would have outlawed council action against apartheid South Africa."
Rafeef Ziadah, a UK spokesperson for the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) National Committee, said the ban will likely only strengthen the resolve to protest "unethical" activities and leave the UK government, once again, on the "wrong side of history."
"By undermining local democracy in service of Israel, [Prime Minister] David Cameron is standing on the wrong side of history just as Margaret Thatcher did with her support for apartheid South Africa," Ziadah said.
"Far from thwarting the growing public support for the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality, these measures simply shine a spotlight on the UK's deepening support for Israel's oppression of Palestinians."
The growing BDS campaign has increasingly been targeted by leaders of Israel-allied nations--including the UK, the United States, and Canada--which organizers say is evidence of its growing impact.
Councils in the UK hamlets of Leicester, Swansea, and Bristol are among the local bodies that recently passed resolutions in support of BDS or condemning companies involved in illegal Israeli settlements, though a number of those motions were non-binding and now threaten to be superseded.