As Tech Giants Meet With Modi, India's Poor Search for Real Internet Access
Net neutrality advocates criticize Facebook's continuing venture into internet grabs in developing countries
While tech giants praised a high-profile meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in Menlo Park, California on Sunday, net neutrality advocates took the occasion to criticize Facebook's controversial venture into internet access for developing countries.
Facebook recently rebranded its Internet.org initiative after receiving backlash from consumer advocates who said it violated net neutrality rules by only allowing users free access to a small number of curated websites, including Facebook.
Despite renaming the venture to Free Basics, criticism of the program--which has launched in 18 countries--remains strong.
Even with a shift away from its misleading philanthropic title, the program's aims remain disingenuous. "Facebook has finally stopped trying to pretend that this is an effort at philanthropy by correctly calling it FreeBasics.com by Facebook and not internet.org which neither had the internet nor the org," Mishi Choudhary, executive director of the India-based Software Freedom Law Center, said on Tuesday.
"In countries like India, [net neutrality] is more about cost of access than speed of access: all lanes are slow," Choudhary said.
As The Hindu pointed out on Tuesday, not one question during Zuckerberg and Modi's 45-minute Q&A broached the topic of net neutrality.
Critics have also noted that by routing online traffic through partner organizations, Facebook would be able to sweep up user data and give itself ownership over images and videos posted through the program.
That means "the poor will be comprehensively surveilled by Facebook, losing any shred of personal privacy, while the rich using the real Internet do not route all their traffic through Facebook," Choudhary said.
As the LA Times explains:
In India, while more than 8 million are gaining Internet access every month, more than 800 million people are still without it, according to industry figures. With Facebook under constant pressure to show it can grow beyond its 1.5 billion worldwide users, India represents a potential gold mine - which perhaps explains why Zuckerberg has aggressively courted Modi since the Indian leader took office in May 2014.
Moreover, according to Facebook's own data, only 20 percent of Free Basics users in India are reaching the web for the first time, which contradicts the company's claims that the venture aims to provide service to communities without internet access.
As Hrush Bhatt, founder of Cleartrip.org--a travel company that pulled its partnership from Internet.org following the net neutrality backlash--told the LA Times on Monday, "It's disingenuous for Facebook to do this in the name of providing connectivity."
"If they really want to provide connectivity, why not give out phones or provide subsidies for data plans?" Bhatt said.
Choudhary continued, "The poor deserve the same sanitation, health care, drinking water, primary and secondary education, and network communications as the rich... Fair regulatory pricing of telecommunications tariffs in India would allow the Indian poor access to data service, as they now have access to mobile telephony, at prices they can afford."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While tech giants praised a high-profile meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in Menlo Park, California on Sunday, net neutrality advocates took the occasion to criticize Facebook's controversial venture into internet access for developing countries.
Facebook recently rebranded its Internet.org initiative after receiving backlash from consumer advocates who said it violated net neutrality rules by only allowing users free access to a small number of curated websites, including Facebook.
Despite renaming the venture to Free Basics, criticism of the program--which has launched in 18 countries--remains strong.
Even with a shift away from its misleading philanthropic title, the program's aims remain disingenuous. "Facebook has finally stopped trying to pretend that this is an effort at philanthropy by correctly calling it FreeBasics.com by Facebook and not internet.org which neither had the internet nor the org," Mishi Choudhary, executive director of the India-based Software Freedom Law Center, said on Tuesday.
"In countries like India, [net neutrality] is more about cost of access than speed of access: all lanes are slow," Choudhary said.
As The Hindu pointed out on Tuesday, not one question during Zuckerberg and Modi's 45-minute Q&A broached the topic of net neutrality.
Critics have also noted that by routing online traffic through partner organizations, Facebook would be able to sweep up user data and give itself ownership over images and videos posted through the program.
That means "the poor will be comprehensively surveilled by Facebook, losing any shred of personal privacy, while the rich using the real Internet do not route all their traffic through Facebook," Choudhary said.
As the LA Times explains:
In India, while more than 8 million are gaining Internet access every month, more than 800 million people are still without it, according to industry figures. With Facebook under constant pressure to show it can grow beyond its 1.5 billion worldwide users, India represents a potential gold mine - which perhaps explains why Zuckerberg has aggressively courted Modi since the Indian leader took office in May 2014.
Moreover, according to Facebook's own data, only 20 percent of Free Basics users in India are reaching the web for the first time, which contradicts the company's claims that the venture aims to provide service to communities without internet access.
As Hrush Bhatt, founder of Cleartrip.org--a travel company that pulled its partnership from Internet.org following the net neutrality backlash--told the LA Times on Monday, "It's disingenuous for Facebook to do this in the name of providing connectivity."
"If they really want to provide connectivity, why not give out phones or provide subsidies for data plans?" Bhatt said.
Choudhary continued, "The poor deserve the same sanitation, health care, drinking water, primary and secondary education, and network communications as the rich... Fair regulatory pricing of telecommunications tariffs in India would allow the Indian poor access to data service, as they now have access to mobile telephony, at prices they can afford."
While tech giants praised a high-profile meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in Menlo Park, California on Sunday, net neutrality advocates took the occasion to criticize Facebook's controversial venture into internet access for developing countries.
Facebook recently rebranded its Internet.org initiative after receiving backlash from consumer advocates who said it violated net neutrality rules by only allowing users free access to a small number of curated websites, including Facebook.
Despite renaming the venture to Free Basics, criticism of the program--which has launched in 18 countries--remains strong.
Even with a shift away from its misleading philanthropic title, the program's aims remain disingenuous. "Facebook has finally stopped trying to pretend that this is an effort at philanthropy by correctly calling it FreeBasics.com by Facebook and not internet.org which neither had the internet nor the org," Mishi Choudhary, executive director of the India-based Software Freedom Law Center, said on Tuesday.
"In countries like India, [net neutrality] is more about cost of access than speed of access: all lanes are slow," Choudhary said.
As The Hindu pointed out on Tuesday, not one question during Zuckerberg and Modi's 45-minute Q&A broached the topic of net neutrality.
Critics have also noted that by routing online traffic through partner organizations, Facebook would be able to sweep up user data and give itself ownership over images and videos posted through the program.
That means "the poor will be comprehensively surveilled by Facebook, losing any shred of personal privacy, while the rich using the real Internet do not route all their traffic through Facebook," Choudhary said.
As the LA Times explains:
In India, while more than 8 million are gaining Internet access every month, more than 800 million people are still without it, according to industry figures. With Facebook under constant pressure to show it can grow beyond its 1.5 billion worldwide users, India represents a potential gold mine - which perhaps explains why Zuckerberg has aggressively courted Modi since the Indian leader took office in May 2014.
Moreover, according to Facebook's own data, only 20 percent of Free Basics users in India are reaching the web for the first time, which contradicts the company's claims that the venture aims to provide service to communities without internet access.
As Hrush Bhatt, founder of Cleartrip.org--a travel company that pulled its partnership from Internet.org following the net neutrality backlash--told the LA Times on Monday, "It's disingenuous for Facebook to do this in the name of providing connectivity."
"If they really want to provide connectivity, why not give out phones or provide subsidies for data plans?" Bhatt said.
Choudhary continued, "The poor deserve the same sanitation, health care, drinking water, primary and secondary education, and network communications as the rich... Fair regulatory pricing of telecommunications tariffs in India would allow the Indian poor access to data service, as they now have access to mobile telephony, at prices they can afford."