SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US-Backed Syrian Rebels Handed Over Equipment to Al Qaeda Affiliate, Military Admits
U.S. Central Command said Friday that the weapons and equipment were 'surrendered' to the al Nusra Front in exchange for 'safe passage'
Sep 26, 2015
The U.S.-trained and armed rebels at the center of President Barack Obama's Syria policy have turned over at least a quarter of their American-issued equipment to the the al Nusra Front, which is linked with al Qaeda, Central Command admitted late Friday.
"Today the [New Syrian Forces] unit contacted Coalition representatives and informed us that on Sept. 21-22 they gave six pick-up trucks and a portion of their ammunition to a suspected al Nusra Front intermediary, which equates to roughly 25 percent of their issued equipment," said Col. Patrick Ryder, Central Command spokesperson, in a press statement.
The equipment was surrendered "in exchange for safe passage within their operating area," according to Central Command.
The revelation contradicts U.S. military officials' claims earlier this week that the U.S.-backed forces had not, in fact, given their equipment and arms to al-Nusra. Ryder said Central Command had received "new information," emphasizing that "the report of NSF members providing equipment to Al Nusra Front is very concerning and a violation of Syria train and equip program guidelines."
Friday's announcement follows last week's admission by Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country. Despite this failure, Central Command announced earlier this week it had sent an additional 70 graduates of a U.S. anti-ISIS training program, and those forces have "successfully re-entered Syria complete with their weapons and equipment and are currently operating as New Syrian Forces."
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command has been scandalized by a series of reports alleging it has deceived the public by falsely claiming that U.S. air strikes against ISIS are more effective than they actually are. In response, the Pentagon launched an investigation last month.
Critics charge that Friday's revelations underscore that the Obama administration's policies of regime change and armed intervention in Syria have failed, and there is no U.S. military solution to the conflict. Yet hawkish voices in the U.S.--from retired general David Petraeus to Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.)--continue to call for even more aggressive bombing and military action.
"Critics of the administration are saying that the U.S. program to arm and train these people is a failure and obviously they are right," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams. "But that doesn't mean the answer is military escalation. The answer is that the whole project is flawed from the start."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The U.S.-trained and armed rebels at the center of President Barack Obama's Syria policy have turned over at least a quarter of their American-issued equipment to the the al Nusra Front, which is linked with al Qaeda, Central Command admitted late Friday.
"Today the [New Syrian Forces] unit contacted Coalition representatives and informed us that on Sept. 21-22 they gave six pick-up trucks and a portion of their ammunition to a suspected al Nusra Front intermediary, which equates to roughly 25 percent of their issued equipment," said Col. Patrick Ryder, Central Command spokesperson, in a press statement.
The equipment was surrendered "in exchange for safe passage within their operating area," according to Central Command.
The revelation contradicts U.S. military officials' claims earlier this week that the U.S.-backed forces had not, in fact, given their equipment and arms to al-Nusra. Ryder said Central Command had received "new information," emphasizing that "the report of NSF members providing equipment to Al Nusra Front is very concerning and a violation of Syria train and equip program guidelines."
Friday's announcement follows last week's admission by Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country. Despite this failure, Central Command announced earlier this week it had sent an additional 70 graduates of a U.S. anti-ISIS training program, and those forces have "successfully re-entered Syria complete with their weapons and equipment and are currently operating as New Syrian Forces."
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command has been scandalized by a series of reports alleging it has deceived the public by falsely claiming that U.S. air strikes against ISIS are more effective than they actually are. In response, the Pentagon launched an investigation last month.
Critics charge that Friday's revelations underscore that the Obama administration's policies of regime change and armed intervention in Syria have failed, and there is no U.S. military solution to the conflict. Yet hawkish voices in the U.S.--from retired general David Petraeus to Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.)--continue to call for even more aggressive bombing and military action.
"Critics of the administration are saying that the U.S. program to arm and train these people is a failure and obviously they are right," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams. "But that doesn't mean the answer is military escalation. The answer is that the whole project is flawed from the start."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The U.S.-trained and armed rebels at the center of President Barack Obama's Syria policy have turned over at least a quarter of their American-issued equipment to the the al Nusra Front, which is linked with al Qaeda, Central Command admitted late Friday.
"Today the [New Syrian Forces] unit contacted Coalition representatives and informed us that on Sept. 21-22 they gave six pick-up trucks and a portion of their ammunition to a suspected al Nusra Front intermediary, which equates to roughly 25 percent of their issued equipment," said Col. Patrick Ryder, Central Command spokesperson, in a press statement.
The equipment was surrendered "in exchange for safe passage within their operating area," according to Central Command.
The revelation contradicts U.S. military officials' claims earlier this week that the U.S.-backed forces had not, in fact, given their equipment and arms to al-Nusra. Ryder said Central Command had received "new information," emphasizing that "the report of NSF members providing equipment to Al Nusra Front is very concerning and a violation of Syria train and equip program guidelines."
Friday's announcement follows last week's admission by Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country. Despite this failure, Central Command announced earlier this week it had sent an additional 70 graduates of a U.S. anti-ISIS training program, and those forces have "successfully re-entered Syria complete with their weapons and equipment and are currently operating as New Syrian Forces."
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command has been scandalized by a series of reports alleging it has deceived the public by falsely claiming that U.S. air strikes against ISIS are more effective than they actually are. In response, the Pentagon launched an investigation last month.
Critics charge that Friday's revelations underscore that the Obama administration's policies of regime change and armed intervention in Syria have failed, and there is no U.S. military solution to the conflict. Yet hawkish voices in the U.S.--from retired general David Petraeus to Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.)--continue to call for even more aggressive bombing and military action.
"Critics of the administration are saying that the U.S. program to arm and train these people is a failure and obviously they are right," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams. "But that doesn't mean the answer is military escalation. The answer is that the whole project is flawed from the start."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.