In St. Louis, Black Youths Bear Brunt of Dysfunctional Justice System
'In short, Black children are subjected to harsher treatment because of their race,' the US Justice Department found
Black kids in St. Louis, Missouri are being disproportionately impacted by unconstitutional and discriminatory miscarriages of justice within the Family Court system, according to a two-year investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.
According to a statement on Friday from the agency's Civil Rights Division, the probe found multiple constitutional violations, including:
- Failure to ensure youth facing delinquency proceedings have adequate legal representation;
- Failure to make adequate determinations that there is probable cause that a child committed the alleged offense;
- Failure to provide adequate due process to children facing certification for criminal prosecution in adult criminal court;
- Failure to ensure that children's guilty pleas are entered knowingly and voluntarily;
- An organizational structure that is rife with conflicts of interest, is contrary to separation of powers principles and deprives children of adequate due process; and
- Disparate treatment of Black children at four key decision points within the juvenile justice system.
"In short, Black children are subjected to harsher treatment because of their race," the findings report reads.
For example, the probe found that Black youths are almost one-and-a-half times more likely than White children to have their cases handled "formally," even after introducing control variables such as gender, age, risk factors, and severity of the allegation. "Processing a case informally is considered more desirable for youth because after successful completion of an informal disposition, the case is dismissed," the report explains.
In other words, the investigation indicates that Black children have less opportunity to benefit from diversion alternatives--such as drug counseling or educational programming--when compared with White children.
"The findings we issue today are serious and compelling," said Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
"Missouri was at the forefront of juvenile corrections reform when it closed its large juvenile institutions and moved to a smaller, treatment-focused system and we are hopeful that Missouri will rise to this challenge to, once again, be a leader in juvenile justice reform," she added. "This investigation is another step toward our goal of ensuring that children in the juvenile justice system receive their constitutionally guaranteed rights to due process and equal protection under the law."
But to do so will require the sweeping structural overhaul of a system that Gupta described to the Huffington Post as "just rife with conflict."
"It is assembly-line justice, if you can call it justice at all," she added.
As HuffPo journalist Ryan J. Reilly reports:
The Justice Department's report found that the St. Louis County Family Court's organization structure "presents inherent conflicts of interest" that are "contrary to constitutional separation of powers principles" and deprive children of due process. The court's own legal officers play the role of prosecutors in the court, but are not "ethically constrained to pursue justice or act in accordance with the public interest," according to the report. Those legal officers--the quasi-prosecutors--instead are obligated to advocate zealously for the interests of their clients: deputy juvenile officers, who are responsible for "virtually every aspect" of the operations of the court.
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Justice Department will seek a mutual agreement to resolve the violations, but otherwise could litigate.
"The action is similar--but unrelated--to a different Justice Department report issued in March that was highly critical of police and municipal court practices in Ferguson," the Post-Dispatch notes. "The new report references Ferguson as well, suggesting the that the conflicts of interest in the Ferguson municipal courts and Family Court are similar."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Black kids in St. Louis, Missouri are being disproportionately impacted by unconstitutional and discriminatory miscarriages of justice within the Family Court system, according to a two-year investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.
According to a statement on Friday from the agency's Civil Rights Division, the probe found multiple constitutional violations, including:
- Failure to ensure youth facing delinquency proceedings have adequate legal representation;
- Failure to make adequate determinations that there is probable cause that a child committed the alleged offense;
- Failure to provide adequate due process to children facing certification for criminal prosecution in adult criminal court;
- Failure to ensure that children's guilty pleas are entered knowingly and voluntarily;
- An organizational structure that is rife with conflicts of interest, is contrary to separation of powers principles and deprives children of adequate due process; and
- Disparate treatment of Black children at four key decision points within the juvenile justice system.
"In short, Black children are subjected to harsher treatment because of their race," the findings report reads.
For example, the probe found that Black youths are almost one-and-a-half times more likely than White children to have their cases handled "formally," even after introducing control variables such as gender, age, risk factors, and severity of the allegation. "Processing a case informally is considered more desirable for youth because after successful completion of an informal disposition, the case is dismissed," the report explains.
In other words, the investigation indicates that Black children have less opportunity to benefit from diversion alternatives--such as drug counseling or educational programming--when compared with White children.
"The findings we issue today are serious and compelling," said Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
"Missouri was at the forefront of juvenile corrections reform when it closed its large juvenile institutions and moved to a smaller, treatment-focused system and we are hopeful that Missouri will rise to this challenge to, once again, be a leader in juvenile justice reform," she added. "This investigation is another step toward our goal of ensuring that children in the juvenile justice system receive their constitutionally guaranteed rights to due process and equal protection under the law."
But to do so will require the sweeping structural overhaul of a system that Gupta described to the Huffington Post as "just rife with conflict."
"It is assembly-line justice, if you can call it justice at all," she added.
As HuffPo journalist Ryan J. Reilly reports:
The Justice Department's report found that the St. Louis County Family Court's organization structure "presents inherent conflicts of interest" that are "contrary to constitutional separation of powers principles" and deprive children of due process. The court's own legal officers play the role of prosecutors in the court, but are not "ethically constrained to pursue justice or act in accordance with the public interest," according to the report. Those legal officers--the quasi-prosecutors--instead are obligated to advocate zealously for the interests of their clients: deputy juvenile officers, who are responsible for "virtually every aspect" of the operations of the court.
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Justice Department will seek a mutual agreement to resolve the violations, but otherwise could litigate.
"The action is similar--but unrelated--to a different Justice Department report issued in March that was highly critical of police and municipal court practices in Ferguson," the Post-Dispatch notes. "The new report references Ferguson as well, suggesting the that the conflicts of interest in the Ferguson municipal courts and Family Court are similar."
Black kids in St. Louis, Missouri are being disproportionately impacted by unconstitutional and discriminatory miscarriages of justice within the Family Court system, according to a two-year investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.
According to a statement on Friday from the agency's Civil Rights Division, the probe found multiple constitutional violations, including:
- Failure to ensure youth facing delinquency proceedings have adequate legal representation;
- Failure to make adequate determinations that there is probable cause that a child committed the alleged offense;
- Failure to provide adequate due process to children facing certification for criminal prosecution in adult criminal court;
- Failure to ensure that children's guilty pleas are entered knowingly and voluntarily;
- An organizational structure that is rife with conflicts of interest, is contrary to separation of powers principles and deprives children of adequate due process; and
- Disparate treatment of Black children at four key decision points within the juvenile justice system.
"In short, Black children are subjected to harsher treatment because of their race," the findings report reads.
For example, the probe found that Black youths are almost one-and-a-half times more likely than White children to have their cases handled "formally," even after introducing control variables such as gender, age, risk factors, and severity of the allegation. "Processing a case informally is considered more desirable for youth because after successful completion of an informal disposition, the case is dismissed," the report explains.
In other words, the investigation indicates that Black children have less opportunity to benefit from diversion alternatives--such as drug counseling or educational programming--when compared with White children.
"The findings we issue today are serious and compelling," said Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.
"Missouri was at the forefront of juvenile corrections reform when it closed its large juvenile institutions and moved to a smaller, treatment-focused system and we are hopeful that Missouri will rise to this challenge to, once again, be a leader in juvenile justice reform," she added. "This investigation is another step toward our goal of ensuring that children in the juvenile justice system receive their constitutionally guaranteed rights to due process and equal protection under the law."
But to do so will require the sweeping structural overhaul of a system that Gupta described to the Huffington Post as "just rife with conflict."
"It is assembly-line justice, if you can call it justice at all," she added.
As HuffPo journalist Ryan J. Reilly reports:
The Justice Department's report found that the St. Louis County Family Court's organization structure "presents inherent conflicts of interest" that are "contrary to constitutional separation of powers principles" and deprive children of due process. The court's own legal officers play the role of prosecutors in the court, but are not "ethically constrained to pursue justice or act in accordance with the public interest," according to the report. Those legal officers--the quasi-prosecutors--instead are obligated to advocate zealously for the interests of their clients: deputy juvenile officers, who are responsible for "virtually every aspect" of the operations of the court.
According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Justice Department will seek a mutual agreement to resolve the violations, but otherwise could litigate.
"The action is similar--but unrelated--to a different Justice Department report issued in March that was highly critical of police and municipal court practices in Ferguson," the Post-Dispatch notes. "The new report references Ferguson as well, suggesting the that the conflicts of interest in the Ferguson municipal courts and Family Court are similar."