

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Pew Research Center is out with the findings of a new global survey which shows that--in contrast to nearly half the nations surveyed--those in the U.S do not see climate change as a top threat.
Forty-two percent of respondents in the U.S. said they were very concerned about global climate change. Ranking higher were perceived threats from ISIS (68 percent), Iran's nuclear program (62 percent), cyber-attacks (59 percent), global economic instability (51 percent), and tensions with Russia (43 percent).
Only territorial disputes with China ranked lower than climate change at 30 percent.
Partisan divide was clear, however, with 62 percent of Democrats seeing climate change as a top threat, compared to 20 percent of Republicans.
In the U.S., Europe and the Middle East, ISIS was seen as a top threat. In the UK, for example, 66 percent say they are very concerned about ISIS, a level of fear shared by 84 percent of respondents in Lebanon and 70 percent in Germany.
But global climate change is seen as a top threat 19 of the 40 countries surveyed, including those on the frontlines of the crisis, like the Philippines, Burkina Faso, Brazil, and Peru. Looking at regions as a whole, respondents in Latin America expressed the most concern over climate change with 61 percent seeing it as a very serious threat. And in half of the Asian countries surveyed, climate change was seen as a bigger threat than the other issues.
This widespread view of climate change as a top threat may call for a shift-change in dealing with greenhouse gas emitters, Dr. Michael Dorsey, a member of the Club of Rome and an expert on global governance and sustainability, told IPS News.
"If publics fear climate change more than terrorism, we might have to re-think collective and regulatory approaches for entities responsible for carbon pollution.
"If we accept the fact that carbon pollution drives both human mortality and morbidity, compromises ecosystems, and threatens society, then institutions and firms that produce carbon pollution, as well as those who opt to finance carbon polluters are akin to those who work with entities engaged in and financing terrorism," Dorsey said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Pew Research Center is out with the findings of a new global survey which shows that--in contrast to nearly half the nations surveyed--those in the U.S do not see climate change as a top threat.
Forty-two percent of respondents in the U.S. said they were very concerned about global climate change. Ranking higher were perceived threats from ISIS (68 percent), Iran's nuclear program (62 percent), cyber-attacks (59 percent), global economic instability (51 percent), and tensions with Russia (43 percent).
Only territorial disputes with China ranked lower than climate change at 30 percent.
Partisan divide was clear, however, with 62 percent of Democrats seeing climate change as a top threat, compared to 20 percent of Republicans.
In the U.S., Europe and the Middle East, ISIS was seen as a top threat. In the UK, for example, 66 percent say they are very concerned about ISIS, a level of fear shared by 84 percent of respondents in Lebanon and 70 percent in Germany.
But global climate change is seen as a top threat 19 of the 40 countries surveyed, including those on the frontlines of the crisis, like the Philippines, Burkina Faso, Brazil, and Peru. Looking at regions as a whole, respondents in Latin America expressed the most concern over climate change with 61 percent seeing it as a very serious threat. And in half of the Asian countries surveyed, climate change was seen as a bigger threat than the other issues.
This widespread view of climate change as a top threat may call for a shift-change in dealing with greenhouse gas emitters, Dr. Michael Dorsey, a member of the Club of Rome and an expert on global governance and sustainability, told IPS News.
"If publics fear climate change more than terrorism, we might have to re-think collective and regulatory approaches for entities responsible for carbon pollution.
"If we accept the fact that carbon pollution drives both human mortality and morbidity, compromises ecosystems, and threatens society, then institutions and firms that produce carbon pollution, as well as those who opt to finance carbon polluters are akin to those who work with entities engaged in and financing terrorism," Dorsey said.
The Pew Research Center is out with the findings of a new global survey which shows that--in contrast to nearly half the nations surveyed--those in the U.S do not see climate change as a top threat.
Forty-two percent of respondents in the U.S. said they were very concerned about global climate change. Ranking higher were perceived threats from ISIS (68 percent), Iran's nuclear program (62 percent), cyber-attacks (59 percent), global economic instability (51 percent), and tensions with Russia (43 percent).
Only territorial disputes with China ranked lower than climate change at 30 percent.
Partisan divide was clear, however, with 62 percent of Democrats seeing climate change as a top threat, compared to 20 percent of Republicans.
In the U.S., Europe and the Middle East, ISIS was seen as a top threat. In the UK, for example, 66 percent say they are very concerned about ISIS, a level of fear shared by 84 percent of respondents in Lebanon and 70 percent in Germany.
But global climate change is seen as a top threat 19 of the 40 countries surveyed, including those on the frontlines of the crisis, like the Philippines, Burkina Faso, Brazil, and Peru. Looking at regions as a whole, respondents in Latin America expressed the most concern over climate change with 61 percent seeing it as a very serious threat. And in half of the Asian countries surveyed, climate change was seen as a bigger threat than the other issues.
This widespread view of climate change as a top threat may call for a shift-change in dealing with greenhouse gas emitters, Dr. Michael Dorsey, a member of the Club of Rome and an expert on global governance and sustainability, told IPS News.
"If publics fear climate change more than terrorism, we might have to re-think collective and regulatory approaches for entities responsible for carbon pollution.
"If we accept the fact that carbon pollution drives both human mortality and morbidity, compromises ecosystems, and threatens society, then institutions and firms that produce carbon pollution, as well as those who opt to finance carbon polluters are akin to those who work with entities engaged in and financing terrorism," Dorsey said.