From Prison, Chelsea Manning Proposes Free Speech Protection Bill
Legislation would amend existing rules with an eye toward expanding transparency and access to information as well as free speech and press protections
Chelsea Manning, the U.S. Army whistleblower currently serving a 35-year sentence for leaking thousands of internal military and State Department documents that helped expose wrongdoing by the U.S. government, has proposed legislation from prison aimed at helping others avoid her fate.
The bill, called the National Integrity and Free Speech Protection Act (pdf), would amend laws including the Freedom of Information Act and Espionage Act and federal disclosure rules for journalists, with an eye toward expanding transparency and access to information as well as free speech and press protections.
As the Guardian reports, "[t]he model bill would shift the legal advantage away from government prosecutors acting in the name of 'national security' and towards journalists and their sources. The proposal is significant coming from the individual who has personally felt the wrath of the US government towards official leakers more than anyone else in recent times."
The bill would codify measures Manning called for in an op-ed published Wednesday at the Guardian, in which she declared: "The US needs legislation to protect the public's right to free speech and a free press, to protect it from the actions of the executive branch and to promote the integrity and transparency of the US government."
She wrote:
I believe that when the public lacks even the most fundamental access to what its governments and militaries are doing in their names, then they cease to be involved in the act of citizenship. There is a bright distinction between citizens, who have rights and privileges protected by the state, and subjects, who are under the complete control and authority of the state.
In the past decade or so there have been an increasing number of clashes - both in the public and behind the scenes - between the US government, the news media and those in the public who want fair access to records that pertain to the implementation of policies by their government.
In addition to the 31-page proposed bill, Manning has prepared a section-by-section analysis (pdf) of its language.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Chelsea Manning, the U.S. Army whistleblower currently serving a 35-year sentence for leaking thousands of internal military and State Department documents that helped expose wrongdoing by the U.S. government, has proposed legislation from prison aimed at helping others avoid her fate.
The bill, called the National Integrity and Free Speech Protection Act (pdf), would amend laws including the Freedom of Information Act and Espionage Act and federal disclosure rules for journalists, with an eye toward expanding transparency and access to information as well as free speech and press protections.
As the Guardian reports, "[t]he model bill would shift the legal advantage away from government prosecutors acting in the name of 'national security' and towards journalists and their sources. The proposal is significant coming from the individual who has personally felt the wrath of the US government towards official leakers more than anyone else in recent times."
The bill would codify measures Manning called for in an op-ed published Wednesday at the Guardian, in which she declared: "The US needs legislation to protect the public's right to free speech and a free press, to protect it from the actions of the executive branch and to promote the integrity and transparency of the US government."
She wrote:
I believe that when the public lacks even the most fundamental access to what its governments and militaries are doing in their names, then they cease to be involved in the act of citizenship. There is a bright distinction between citizens, who have rights and privileges protected by the state, and subjects, who are under the complete control and authority of the state.
In the past decade or so there have been an increasing number of clashes - both in the public and behind the scenes - between the US government, the news media and those in the public who want fair access to records that pertain to the implementation of policies by their government.
In addition to the 31-page proposed bill, Manning has prepared a section-by-section analysis (pdf) of its language.
Chelsea Manning, the U.S. Army whistleblower currently serving a 35-year sentence for leaking thousands of internal military and State Department documents that helped expose wrongdoing by the U.S. government, has proposed legislation from prison aimed at helping others avoid her fate.
The bill, called the National Integrity and Free Speech Protection Act (pdf), would amend laws including the Freedom of Information Act and Espionage Act and federal disclosure rules for journalists, with an eye toward expanding transparency and access to information as well as free speech and press protections.
As the Guardian reports, "[t]he model bill would shift the legal advantage away from government prosecutors acting in the name of 'national security' and towards journalists and their sources. The proposal is significant coming from the individual who has personally felt the wrath of the US government towards official leakers more than anyone else in recent times."
The bill would codify measures Manning called for in an op-ed published Wednesday at the Guardian, in which she declared: "The US needs legislation to protect the public's right to free speech and a free press, to protect it from the actions of the executive branch and to promote the integrity and transparency of the US government."
She wrote:
I believe that when the public lacks even the most fundamental access to what its governments and militaries are doing in their names, then they cease to be involved in the act of citizenship. There is a bright distinction between citizens, who have rights and privileges protected by the state, and subjects, who are under the complete control and authority of the state.
In the past decade or so there have been an increasing number of clashes - both in the public and behind the scenes - between the US government, the news media and those in the public who want fair access to records that pertain to the implementation of policies by their government.
In addition to the 31-page proposed bill, Manning has prepared a section-by-section analysis (pdf) of its language.