'Excessive and Unprecedented': Privacy Commissioner Sounds Alarm on Sweeping Anti-Terrorism Legislation
'In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers.'—Daniel Therrien
Canada's Privacy Commissioner has criticized proposed anti-terrorism legislation for affording government "excessive" powers to sweep up information from all Canadians with neither due oversight nor the necessary privacy safeguards.
The legislation, Bill C-51, was introduced in January and has been met with fierce criticism by those who say it was introduced through fear-mongering, threatens to chill legitimate political speech and will face limited debate.
In his op-ed published Friday, Commissioner Daniel Therrien writes the the bill "does not strike the right balance" between privacy and security.
"The scale of information sharing between government departments and agencies being proposed in this bill is unprecedented. The new powers that would be created are excessive and the privacy safeguards being proposed are seriously deficient," he writes.
"The Bill would provide 17 federal government agencies with almost limitless powers to monitor and profile ordinary Canadians," 14 of which face no independent oversight.
He adds that "history has shown us that serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of national security," citing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations as well as a commission that found "national security information sharing led to the torture of Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar."
"Significant changes" are needed to the bill, Therrien writes, including the creation of review bodies "to ensure appropriate oversight" and judicial recourse for those who feel their information was obtained or used improperly.
"In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers," he adds.
Therrien's op-ed comes the same week as Snowden said that Canada's intelligence agencies were subjected to the "weakest oversight" in the Western world.
Opponents of the legislation are holding a day of action on March 14 to highlight what they say is a "reckless, dangerous, and ineffective" bill.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Canada's Privacy Commissioner has criticized proposed anti-terrorism legislation for affording government "excessive" powers to sweep up information from all Canadians with neither due oversight nor the necessary privacy safeguards.
The legislation, Bill C-51, was introduced in January and has been met with fierce criticism by those who say it was introduced through fear-mongering, threatens to chill legitimate political speech and will face limited debate.
In his op-ed published Friday, Commissioner Daniel Therrien writes the the bill "does not strike the right balance" between privacy and security.
"The scale of information sharing between government departments and agencies being proposed in this bill is unprecedented. The new powers that would be created are excessive and the privacy safeguards being proposed are seriously deficient," he writes.
"The Bill would provide 17 federal government agencies with almost limitless powers to monitor and profile ordinary Canadians," 14 of which face no independent oversight.
He adds that "history has shown us that serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of national security," citing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations as well as a commission that found "national security information sharing led to the torture of Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar."
"Significant changes" are needed to the bill, Therrien writes, including the creation of review bodies "to ensure appropriate oversight" and judicial recourse for those who feel their information was obtained or used improperly.
"In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers," he adds.
Therrien's op-ed comes the same week as Snowden said that Canada's intelligence agencies were subjected to the "weakest oversight" in the Western world.
Opponents of the legislation are holding a day of action on March 14 to highlight what they say is a "reckless, dangerous, and ineffective" bill.
Canada's Privacy Commissioner has criticized proposed anti-terrorism legislation for affording government "excessive" powers to sweep up information from all Canadians with neither due oversight nor the necessary privacy safeguards.
The legislation, Bill C-51, was introduced in January and has been met with fierce criticism by those who say it was introduced through fear-mongering, threatens to chill legitimate political speech and will face limited debate.
In his op-ed published Friday, Commissioner Daniel Therrien writes the the bill "does not strike the right balance" between privacy and security.
"The scale of information sharing between government departments and agencies being proposed in this bill is unprecedented. The new powers that would be created are excessive and the privacy safeguards being proposed are seriously deficient," he writes.
"The Bill would provide 17 federal government agencies with almost limitless powers to monitor and profile ordinary Canadians," 14 of which face no independent oversight.
He adds that "history has shown us that serious human rights abuses can occur in the name of national security," citing NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's revelations as well as a commission that found "national security information sharing led to the torture of Syrian-Canadian Maher Arar."
"Significant changes" are needed to the bill, Therrien writes, including the creation of review bodies "to ensure appropriate oversight" and judicial recourse for those who feel their information was obtained or used improperly.
"In a country governed by the rule of law, it should not be left for national security and other government agencies to determine the limits of their own powers," he adds.
Therrien's op-ed comes the same week as Snowden said that Canada's intelligence agencies were subjected to the "weakest oversight" in the Western world.
Opponents of the legislation are holding a day of action on March 14 to highlight what they say is a "reckless, dangerous, and ineffective" bill.