Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek sided with landowners in putting a pause on TransCanada's eminent domain claims. (Photo: Rainforest Action Network/flickr/cc)
Feb 13, 2015
Foes of the Keystone XL claimed a temporary victory on Thursday when a Nebraska judge put a hold on TransCanada's use of eminent domain to seize land for its pipeline.
The temporary injunction issued by Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek halts the energy company's eminent domain claims until the legal challenge is heard by the state supreme court.
Nebraska landowner Jim Tarnick previously called TransCanada's use of eminent domain "just another bullying move by the foreign corporation that swears they are going to be a good neighbor. From the Kalamazoo to the Yellowstone rivers and all across the United States, tar sands are a horrible danger and threat that the President must reject," he said.
The landowners were dealt a blow last month by the state supreme court in their challenge to the constitutionality of state law LB 1161, which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve the pipeline route.
They did have the support of four of the justices--one shy of what the landowners needed. Advocacy group Bold Nebraska states that because TransCanada has now invoked eminent domain claims for land along the pipeline route, it is now clear that their case has standing, giving the group confidence they'll be victorious in their next round at the state's high court.
Meanwhile, Congress this week passed a bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the EPA recently said would "significantly increase" greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands.
President Obama has vowed to veto the legislation, but has not yet said he would kill the project completely.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Foes of the Keystone XL claimed a temporary victory on Thursday when a Nebraska judge put a hold on TransCanada's use of eminent domain to seize land for its pipeline.
The temporary injunction issued by Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek halts the energy company's eminent domain claims until the legal challenge is heard by the state supreme court.
Nebraska landowner Jim Tarnick previously called TransCanada's use of eminent domain "just another bullying move by the foreign corporation that swears they are going to be a good neighbor. From the Kalamazoo to the Yellowstone rivers and all across the United States, tar sands are a horrible danger and threat that the President must reject," he said.
The landowners were dealt a blow last month by the state supreme court in their challenge to the constitutionality of state law LB 1161, which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve the pipeline route.
They did have the support of four of the justices--one shy of what the landowners needed. Advocacy group Bold Nebraska states that because TransCanada has now invoked eminent domain claims for land along the pipeline route, it is now clear that their case has standing, giving the group confidence they'll be victorious in their next round at the state's high court.
Meanwhile, Congress this week passed a bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the EPA recently said would "significantly increase" greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands.
President Obama has vowed to veto the legislation, but has not yet said he would kill the project completely.
Foes of the Keystone XL claimed a temporary victory on Thursday when a Nebraska judge put a hold on TransCanada's use of eminent domain to seize land for its pipeline.
The temporary injunction issued by Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek halts the energy company's eminent domain claims until the legal challenge is heard by the state supreme court.
Nebraska landowner Jim Tarnick previously called TransCanada's use of eminent domain "just another bullying move by the foreign corporation that swears they are going to be a good neighbor. From the Kalamazoo to the Yellowstone rivers and all across the United States, tar sands are a horrible danger and threat that the President must reject," he said.
The landowners were dealt a blow last month by the state supreme court in their challenge to the constitutionality of state law LB 1161, which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve the pipeline route.
They did have the support of four of the justices--one shy of what the landowners needed. Advocacy group Bold Nebraska states that because TransCanada has now invoked eminent domain claims for land along the pipeline route, it is now clear that their case has standing, giving the group confidence they'll be victorious in their next round at the state's high court.
Meanwhile, Congress this week passed a bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the EPA recently said would "significantly increase" greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands.
President Obama has vowed to veto the legislation, but has not yet said he would kill the project completely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.