SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek sided with landowners in putting a pause on TransCanada's eminent domain claims. (Photo: Rainforest Action Network/flickr/cc)
Foes of the Keystone XL claimed a temporary victory on Thursday when a Nebraska judge put a hold on TransCanada's use of eminent domain to seize land for its pipeline.
The temporary injunction issued by Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek halts the energy company's eminent domain claims until the legal challenge is heard by the state supreme court.
Nebraska landowner Jim Tarnick previously called TransCanada's use of eminent domain "just another bullying move by the foreign corporation that swears they are going to be a good neighbor. From the Kalamazoo to the Yellowstone rivers and all across the United States, tar sands are a horrible danger and threat that the President must reject," he said.
The landowners were dealt a blow last month by the state supreme court in their challenge to the constitutionality of state law LB 1161, which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve the pipeline route.
They did have the support of four of the justices--one shy of what the landowners needed. Advocacy group Bold Nebraska states that because TransCanada has now invoked eminent domain claims for land along the pipeline route, it is now clear that their case has standing, giving the group confidence they'll be victorious in their next round at the state's high court.
Meanwhile, Congress this week passed a bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the EPA recently said would "significantly increase" greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands.
President Obama has vowed to veto the legislation, but has not yet said he would kill the project completely.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Foes of the Keystone XL claimed a temporary victory on Thursday when a Nebraska judge put a hold on TransCanada's use of eminent domain to seize land for its pipeline.
The temporary injunction issued by Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek halts the energy company's eminent domain claims until the legal challenge is heard by the state supreme court.
Nebraska landowner Jim Tarnick previously called TransCanada's use of eminent domain "just another bullying move by the foreign corporation that swears they are going to be a good neighbor. From the Kalamazoo to the Yellowstone rivers and all across the United States, tar sands are a horrible danger and threat that the President must reject," he said.
The landowners were dealt a blow last month by the state supreme court in their challenge to the constitutionality of state law LB 1161, which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve the pipeline route.
They did have the support of four of the justices--one shy of what the landowners needed. Advocacy group Bold Nebraska states that because TransCanada has now invoked eminent domain claims for land along the pipeline route, it is now clear that their case has standing, giving the group confidence they'll be victorious in their next round at the state's high court.
Meanwhile, Congress this week passed a bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the EPA recently said would "significantly increase" greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands.
President Obama has vowed to veto the legislation, but has not yet said he would kill the project completely.
Foes of the Keystone XL claimed a temporary victory on Thursday when a Nebraska judge put a hold on TransCanada's use of eminent domain to seize land for its pipeline.
The temporary injunction issued by Holt County District Judge Mark Kozisek halts the energy company's eminent domain claims until the legal challenge is heard by the state supreme court.
Nebraska landowner Jim Tarnick previously called TransCanada's use of eminent domain "just another bullying move by the foreign corporation that swears they are going to be a good neighbor. From the Kalamazoo to the Yellowstone rivers and all across the United States, tar sands are a horrible danger and threat that the President must reject," he said.
The landowners were dealt a blow last month by the state supreme court in their challenge to the constitutionality of state law LB 1161, which allowed Gov. Dave Heineman to approve the pipeline route.
They did have the support of four of the justices--one shy of what the landowners needed. Advocacy group Bold Nebraska states that because TransCanada has now invoked eminent domain claims for land along the pipeline route, it is now clear that their case has standing, giving the group confidence they'll be victorious in their next round at the state's high court.
Meanwhile, Congress this week passed a bill to force construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which the EPA recently said would "significantly increase" greenhouse gas emissions from tar sands.
President Obama has vowed to veto the legislation, but has not yet said he would kill the project completely.