SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Pakistan to Use Military Courts in Terrorism Cases
Human rights watchdogs denounce death penalty plans in wake of Peshawar school attack
Dec 25, 2014
Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced plans on Wednesday to set up military courts for use in terrorism trials following the deadly school attack in Peshawar last week that saw 149 people, most of them children, killed by Taliban fighters.
In a television address, Sharif vowed to crush militancy, saying the courts would be established for "the speedy trial of terrorists." The move is widely expected to be denounced by human rights groups.
The news comes shortly after Sharif lifted Pakistan's six-year moratorium on the death penalty to allow for a wave of mass executions, with roughly 500 people set to be hanged in the coming weeks.
Legal charity Reprieve on Wednesday condemned Pakistan's reinstatement of the death penalty, noting that some of those set to be executed "have a 'black warrant' issued in their names have been convicted of offenses bearing no relation to terrorism."
Among those prisoners is Shafqat Hussain, who was arrested at 14 and tortured into a false confession, Reprieve said, adding that he is "only one of the 86.3% of people tried by the anti-terrorism courts that have nothing to do with terrorism as it is reasonably understood."
Sharif did not elaborate in his address on how the military courts would function or whether people convicted in those trials would be allowed to appeal the rulings. However, the Prime Minister did say that the courts would operate for two years and would require changes in current law. The government is also planning to create a new counter-terrorism force, Sharif said.
Arif Rafiq, an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, told the New York Times that military courts would be a "Faustian bargain" without reform in the civilian justice system.
Sharif's party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, has been accused of ignoring militant operations in the past "for the sake of political expediency," the Times writes. The Prime Minister also advocated for peace talks with the Taliban as recently as this summer.
Legal analyst and retired judge Tariq Mehmood told Pakistan's Geo Television that military courts would only present additional problems.
"In our constitutional system, it's the judiciary, only, that is meant to deliver justice," Mehmood said. "We have anti-terrorism courts in this country, and it's true that there has been a long delay in some cases, but we need to do away with the problems that those courts and judges are facing instead of setting up military courts."
Six people have already been put to death since the moratorium was lifted last week.
"Pakistan's government has chosen to indulge in vengeful blood-lust instead of finding and prosecuting those responsible for the horrific Peshawar attack," Phelim Kine, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said in response to the first wave of executions. "The government's death penalty spree is a craven politicized reaction to the Peshawar killings that will do nothing to bring the attackers to justice."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced plans on Wednesday to set up military courts for use in terrorism trials following the deadly school attack in Peshawar last week that saw 149 people, most of them children, killed by Taliban fighters.
In a television address, Sharif vowed to crush militancy, saying the courts would be established for "the speedy trial of terrorists." The move is widely expected to be denounced by human rights groups.
The news comes shortly after Sharif lifted Pakistan's six-year moratorium on the death penalty to allow for a wave of mass executions, with roughly 500 people set to be hanged in the coming weeks.
Legal charity Reprieve on Wednesday condemned Pakistan's reinstatement of the death penalty, noting that some of those set to be executed "have a 'black warrant' issued in their names have been convicted of offenses bearing no relation to terrorism."
Among those prisoners is Shafqat Hussain, who was arrested at 14 and tortured into a false confession, Reprieve said, adding that he is "only one of the 86.3% of people tried by the anti-terrorism courts that have nothing to do with terrorism as it is reasonably understood."
Sharif did not elaborate in his address on how the military courts would function or whether people convicted in those trials would be allowed to appeal the rulings. However, the Prime Minister did say that the courts would operate for two years and would require changes in current law. The government is also planning to create a new counter-terrorism force, Sharif said.
Arif Rafiq, an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, told the New York Times that military courts would be a "Faustian bargain" without reform in the civilian justice system.
Sharif's party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, has been accused of ignoring militant operations in the past "for the sake of political expediency," the Times writes. The Prime Minister also advocated for peace talks with the Taliban as recently as this summer.
Legal analyst and retired judge Tariq Mehmood told Pakistan's Geo Television that military courts would only present additional problems.
"In our constitutional system, it's the judiciary, only, that is meant to deliver justice," Mehmood said. "We have anti-terrorism courts in this country, and it's true that there has been a long delay in some cases, but we need to do away with the problems that those courts and judges are facing instead of setting up military courts."
Six people have already been put to death since the moratorium was lifted last week.
"Pakistan's government has chosen to indulge in vengeful blood-lust instead of finding and prosecuting those responsible for the horrific Peshawar attack," Phelim Kine, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said in response to the first wave of executions. "The government's death penalty spree is a craven politicized reaction to the Peshawar killings that will do nothing to bring the attackers to justice."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif announced plans on Wednesday to set up military courts for use in terrorism trials following the deadly school attack in Peshawar last week that saw 149 people, most of them children, killed by Taliban fighters.
In a television address, Sharif vowed to crush militancy, saying the courts would be established for "the speedy trial of terrorists." The move is widely expected to be denounced by human rights groups.
The news comes shortly after Sharif lifted Pakistan's six-year moratorium on the death penalty to allow for a wave of mass executions, with roughly 500 people set to be hanged in the coming weeks.
Legal charity Reprieve on Wednesday condemned Pakistan's reinstatement of the death penalty, noting that some of those set to be executed "have a 'black warrant' issued in their names have been convicted of offenses bearing no relation to terrorism."
Among those prisoners is Shafqat Hussain, who was arrested at 14 and tortured into a false confession, Reprieve said, adding that he is "only one of the 86.3% of people tried by the anti-terrorism courts that have nothing to do with terrorism as it is reasonably understood."
Sharif did not elaborate in his address on how the military courts would function or whether people convicted in those trials would be allowed to appeal the rulings. However, the Prime Minister did say that the courts would operate for two years and would require changes in current law. The government is also planning to create a new counter-terrorism force, Sharif said.
Arif Rafiq, an adjunct scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington, told the New York Times that military courts would be a "Faustian bargain" without reform in the civilian justice system.
Sharif's party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, has been accused of ignoring militant operations in the past "for the sake of political expediency," the Times writes. The Prime Minister also advocated for peace talks with the Taliban as recently as this summer.
Legal analyst and retired judge Tariq Mehmood told Pakistan's Geo Television that military courts would only present additional problems.
"In our constitutional system, it's the judiciary, only, that is meant to deliver justice," Mehmood said. "We have anti-terrorism courts in this country, and it's true that there has been a long delay in some cases, but we need to do away with the problems that those courts and judges are facing instead of setting up military courts."
Six people have already been put to death since the moratorium was lifted last week.
"Pakistan's government has chosen to indulge in vengeful blood-lust instead of finding and prosecuting those responsible for the horrific Peshawar attack," Phelim Kine, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said in response to the first wave of executions. "The government's death penalty spree is a craven politicized reaction to the Peshawar killings that will do nothing to bring the attackers to justice."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.