SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Want Your Constitutional Right to Choose? Live in Texas? Get Driving.
'All Texas women have been relegated today to a second class of citizens whose constitutional rights are lesser than those in states less hostile to reproductive autonomy.'
Oct 03, 2014
A ruling by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Thursday will result in the immediate shuttering of at least thirteen reproductive health and abortion clinics in the state of Texas, forcing millions of women across the state seeking the services of those facilities to now travel possibly hundreds of miles in order to obtain them.
The decision by the court was in reaction to a previous federal ruling which put a stay on implementation of a controversial Texas law, passed by the state legislature last year, which place procedural and infrastructure demands on all abortion clinics that most could not meet. Those restrictions included making sure all physicians at those clinics had admitting privileges at a local hospital and required the clinics themselves to be upgraded with expensive building requirements that were, for most, impossible to meet. Though the still law faces legal challenges, Thursday's ruling means that until its ultimate fate is decided--likely by the U.S. Supreme Court--the new policies will now be implemented and the clinics will close immediately.
Women's health advocates and defenders of the right to choose were infuriated by the court's decision.
"Today's ruling has gutted Texas women's constitutional rights and access to critical reproductive health care and stands to make safe, legal abortion essentially disappear overnight," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought suit against the state of Texas over the law.
The court's decision, Northrup continued, amounts to judicial endorsement of the same "disingenuous tactic" used by Texas lawmakers who are "undermining women's safety under the false pretext of protecting it."
Though the three-judge panel (consisting of three male justices) acknowledge the argument that the closing of facilities, which they appeared to recognize as the inevitable result of the new statutes, would force an estimated one out six Texas women to travel at least 150 miles in order to obtain their constitutionally protected right to an abortion, the court determined that "This is nowhere near a 'large fraction.'"
Northrup reacted forcefully to that calculation. "Absolutely no woman's rights or access to essential reproductive health care should be determined by her zip code," she said and vowed that her organization and other would continue to fight what has become a trend of anti-women and anti-choice legislation nationwide.
According to the Washington Post:
The ruling is not a surprise coming from the Fifth Circuit, one of the most conservative federal appellate courts. It previously sided with the state in a challenge to another provision of the law that requires any physician performing an abortion to have active admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the location where the abortion is performed.
Two of the three judges were appointed by Republican presidents. The third judge, Stephen A. Higginson, was appointed by President Obama. He agreed with the other judges, but would have given exception to two clinics, one in El Paso and one in McAllen.
In all, 80 percent of Texas's abortion clinics serving 5.4 million women of reproductive age have closed since the law took effect. All of the clinics west and south of San Antonio have closed, leaving a large swath of the state without abortion services. Residents of the Rio Grande valley will be at least 230 miles from the nearest abortion clinic.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A ruling by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Thursday will result in the immediate shuttering of at least thirteen reproductive health and abortion clinics in the state of Texas, forcing millions of women across the state seeking the services of those facilities to now travel possibly hundreds of miles in order to obtain them.
The decision by the court was in reaction to a previous federal ruling which put a stay on implementation of a controversial Texas law, passed by the state legislature last year, which place procedural and infrastructure demands on all abortion clinics that most could not meet. Those restrictions included making sure all physicians at those clinics had admitting privileges at a local hospital and required the clinics themselves to be upgraded with expensive building requirements that were, for most, impossible to meet. Though the still law faces legal challenges, Thursday's ruling means that until its ultimate fate is decided--likely by the U.S. Supreme Court--the new policies will now be implemented and the clinics will close immediately.
Women's health advocates and defenders of the right to choose were infuriated by the court's decision.
"Today's ruling has gutted Texas women's constitutional rights and access to critical reproductive health care and stands to make safe, legal abortion essentially disappear overnight," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought suit against the state of Texas over the law.
The court's decision, Northrup continued, amounts to judicial endorsement of the same "disingenuous tactic" used by Texas lawmakers who are "undermining women's safety under the false pretext of protecting it."
Though the three-judge panel (consisting of three male justices) acknowledge the argument that the closing of facilities, which they appeared to recognize as the inevitable result of the new statutes, would force an estimated one out six Texas women to travel at least 150 miles in order to obtain their constitutionally protected right to an abortion, the court determined that "This is nowhere near a 'large fraction.'"
Northrup reacted forcefully to that calculation. "Absolutely no woman's rights or access to essential reproductive health care should be determined by her zip code," she said and vowed that her organization and other would continue to fight what has become a trend of anti-women and anti-choice legislation nationwide.
According to the Washington Post:
The ruling is not a surprise coming from the Fifth Circuit, one of the most conservative federal appellate courts. It previously sided with the state in a challenge to another provision of the law that requires any physician performing an abortion to have active admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the location where the abortion is performed.
Two of the three judges were appointed by Republican presidents. The third judge, Stephen A. Higginson, was appointed by President Obama. He agreed with the other judges, but would have given exception to two clinics, one in El Paso and one in McAllen.
In all, 80 percent of Texas's abortion clinics serving 5.4 million women of reproductive age have closed since the law took effect. All of the clinics west and south of San Antonio have closed, leaving a large swath of the state without abortion services. Residents of the Rio Grande valley will be at least 230 miles from the nearest abortion clinic.
A ruling by the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Thursday will result in the immediate shuttering of at least thirteen reproductive health and abortion clinics in the state of Texas, forcing millions of women across the state seeking the services of those facilities to now travel possibly hundreds of miles in order to obtain them.
The decision by the court was in reaction to a previous federal ruling which put a stay on implementation of a controversial Texas law, passed by the state legislature last year, which place procedural and infrastructure demands on all abortion clinics that most could not meet. Those restrictions included making sure all physicians at those clinics had admitting privileges at a local hospital and required the clinics themselves to be upgraded with expensive building requirements that were, for most, impossible to meet. Though the still law faces legal challenges, Thursday's ruling means that until its ultimate fate is decided--likely by the U.S. Supreme Court--the new policies will now be implemented and the clinics will close immediately.
Women's health advocates and defenders of the right to choose were infuriated by the court's decision.
"Today's ruling has gutted Texas women's constitutional rights and access to critical reproductive health care and stands to make safe, legal abortion essentially disappear overnight," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought suit against the state of Texas over the law.
The court's decision, Northrup continued, amounts to judicial endorsement of the same "disingenuous tactic" used by Texas lawmakers who are "undermining women's safety under the false pretext of protecting it."
Though the three-judge panel (consisting of three male justices) acknowledge the argument that the closing of facilities, which they appeared to recognize as the inevitable result of the new statutes, would force an estimated one out six Texas women to travel at least 150 miles in order to obtain their constitutionally protected right to an abortion, the court determined that "This is nowhere near a 'large fraction.'"
Northrup reacted forcefully to that calculation. "Absolutely no woman's rights or access to essential reproductive health care should be determined by her zip code," she said and vowed that her organization and other would continue to fight what has become a trend of anti-women and anti-choice legislation nationwide.
According to the Washington Post:
The ruling is not a surprise coming from the Fifth Circuit, one of the most conservative federal appellate courts. It previously sided with the state in a challenge to another provision of the law that requires any physician performing an abortion to have active admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the location where the abortion is performed.
Two of the three judges were appointed by Republican presidents. The third judge, Stephen A. Higginson, was appointed by President Obama. He agreed with the other judges, but would have given exception to two clinics, one in El Paso and one in McAllen.
In all, 80 percent of Texas's abortion clinics serving 5.4 million women of reproductive age have closed since the law took effect. All of the clinics west and south of San Antonio have closed, leaving a large swath of the state without abortion services. Residents of the Rio Grande valley will be at least 230 miles from the nearest abortion clinic.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.