SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A poster from the 2010 Earth Day Climate Rally in Washington, DC. (Credit: Brown Political Review)
Poll: 'Huge Majority' of Americans Willing to Pay Price to Fight Global Warming
US public outpaces lawmakers in recognizing urgency of the crisis
Jun 03, 2014
Not only do a significant majority of Americans believe that state and federal governments should regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants in order to stave off resulting global warming, according to a new poll, they're willing to pay a financial cost to help make that happen.
On the same day as new rules by the Obama administration were made official by the Environmental Protection Agency, an ABC/Washington Post poll found that 7 out of 10 people--called a "huge majority"--agree that the government should enforce regulations that "limit the release of greenhouse gases from existing power plants in an effort to reduce global warming."
When asked if they would still support such effort even if it would increase their monthly energy bills by $20, a full 63 percent said they would.
No one is arguing that the findings of this poll represent a new era in which seventy percent of Americans are calling for a dramatic shift of the nation's energy paradigm as their primary political call. What it does seem to say, however, is that a subtantial cross-section of the American public--as opposed to lawmakers in Congress--are willing to take responsibility for the climate crisis by acknowledging the problem and by showing an increasing willingness to help solve it.
____________________________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Not only do a significant majority of Americans believe that state and federal governments should regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants in order to stave off resulting global warming, according to a new poll, they're willing to pay a financial cost to help make that happen.
On the same day as new rules by the Obama administration were made official by the Environmental Protection Agency, an ABC/Washington Post poll found that 7 out of 10 people--called a "huge majority"--agree that the government should enforce regulations that "limit the release of greenhouse gases from existing power plants in an effort to reduce global warming."
When asked if they would still support such effort even if it would increase their monthly energy bills by $20, a full 63 percent said they would.
No one is arguing that the findings of this poll represent a new era in which seventy percent of Americans are calling for a dramatic shift of the nation's energy paradigm as their primary political call. What it does seem to say, however, is that a subtantial cross-section of the American public--as opposed to lawmakers in Congress--are willing to take responsibility for the climate crisis by acknowledging the problem and by showing an increasing willingness to help solve it.
____________________________________________
Not only do a significant majority of Americans believe that state and federal governments should regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants in order to stave off resulting global warming, according to a new poll, they're willing to pay a financial cost to help make that happen.
On the same day as new rules by the Obama administration were made official by the Environmental Protection Agency, an ABC/Washington Post poll found that 7 out of 10 people--called a "huge majority"--agree that the government should enforce regulations that "limit the release of greenhouse gases from existing power plants in an effort to reduce global warming."
When asked if they would still support such effort even if it would increase their monthly energy bills by $20, a full 63 percent said they would.
No one is arguing that the findings of this poll represent a new era in which seventy percent of Americans are calling for a dramatic shift of the nation's energy paradigm as their primary political call. What it does seem to say, however, is that a subtantial cross-section of the American public--as opposed to lawmakers in Congress--are willing to take responsibility for the climate crisis by acknowledging the problem and by showing an increasing willingness to help solve it.
____________________________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.