Vermonters at a rally in 2013 supporting GMO labeling. (Photo: Cedar Circle Farm & Education Center/cc/flickr)
May 08, 2014
Vermont made history on Thursday by becoming the first state to require the labeling of foods with genetically modified ingredients following passage of a no "trigger clause" bill.
The measure passed both bodies of the state legislature last month, and officially became law Thursday afternoon with Governor Peter Shumlin's signature.
In addition to the mandated labeling to take effect July 2016, the law prevents GMO foods from being labeled with "natural" or with any other similarly misleading statement.
While two other New England states -- Connecticut and Maine -- have passed GMO labeling laws, theirs require a certain number of other states to also enact GMO legislation. Vermont's law, in contrast, has no such trigger clause.
"Vermont sent a clear message that it has sided with the 93 percent of Americans who support mandatory labeling, and not the chemical companies who want to keep us in the dark," Ken Cook, president and co-founder of Environmental Working Group (EWG), said in a statement. "Americans, regardless of whether they live in Vermont or any other state, want and deserve the right to know more about their food."
Vermont is already bracing for a fight from labeling opponents, and has set up a Food Fight Fund site to "mount a powerful defense" against future legal battles.
Despite well-funded opposition from groups like the Grocery Manufacturers Association, EWG states that there are over "30 other states are poised to consider labeling bills and ballot initiatives this year." Advocates say this is as sign the labeling movement is going strong.
Gary Hirshberg, founder of Stonyfield Farm and chairman of Just Label It, cheered Vermont's law as a "historic victory" and said that opponents "will not prevail." Rather, the win in Vermont will catalyze the movement and "hasten similar labeling bills across the country and ultimately at the federal level. This is what citizens want," he stated.
Echoing Hirshber, Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association, stated that "[w]e will not back down. This movement is here to stay."
______________________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Vermont made history on Thursday by becoming the first state to require the labeling of foods with genetically modified ingredients following passage of a no "trigger clause" bill.
The measure passed both bodies of the state legislature last month, and officially became law Thursday afternoon with Governor Peter Shumlin's signature.
In addition to the mandated labeling to take effect July 2016, the law prevents GMO foods from being labeled with "natural" or with any other similarly misleading statement.
While two other New England states -- Connecticut and Maine -- have passed GMO labeling laws, theirs require a certain number of other states to also enact GMO legislation. Vermont's law, in contrast, has no such trigger clause.
"Vermont sent a clear message that it has sided with the 93 percent of Americans who support mandatory labeling, and not the chemical companies who want to keep us in the dark," Ken Cook, president and co-founder of Environmental Working Group (EWG), said in a statement. "Americans, regardless of whether they live in Vermont or any other state, want and deserve the right to know more about their food."
Vermont is already bracing for a fight from labeling opponents, and has set up a Food Fight Fund site to "mount a powerful defense" against future legal battles.
Despite well-funded opposition from groups like the Grocery Manufacturers Association, EWG states that there are over "30 other states are poised to consider labeling bills and ballot initiatives this year." Advocates say this is as sign the labeling movement is going strong.
Gary Hirshberg, founder of Stonyfield Farm and chairman of Just Label It, cheered Vermont's law as a "historic victory" and said that opponents "will not prevail." Rather, the win in Vermont will catalyze the movement and "hasten similar labeling bills across the country and ultimately at the federal level. This is what citizens want," he stated.
Echoing Hirshber, Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association, stated that "[w]e will not back down. This movement is here to stay."
______________________________
Vermont made history on Thursday by becoming the first state to require the labeling of foods with genetically modified ingredients following passage of a no "trigger clause" bill.
The measure passed both bodies of the state legislature last month, and officially became law Thursday afternoon with Governor Peter Shumlin's signature.
In addition to the mandated labeling to take effect July 2016, the law prevents GMO foods from being labeled with "natural" or with any other similarly misleading statement.
While two other New England states -- Connecticut and Maine -- have passed GMO labeling laws, theirs require a certain number of other states to also enact GMO legislation. Vermont's law, in contrast, has no such trigger clause.
"Vermont sent a clear message that it has sided with the 93 percent of Americans who support mandatory labeling, and not the chemical companies who want to keep us in the dark," Ken Cook, president and co-founder of Environmental Working Group (EWG), said in a statement. "Americans, regardless of whether they live in Vermont or any other state, want and deserve the right to know more about their food."
Vermont is already bracing for a fight from labeling opponents, and has set up a Food Fight Fund site to "mount a powerful defense" against future legal battles.
Despite well-funded opposition from groups like the Grocery Manufacturers Association, EWG states that there are over "30 other states are poised to consider labeling bills and ballot initiatives this year." Advocates say this is as sign the labeling movement is going strong.
Gary Hirshberg, founder of Stonyfield Farm and chairman of Just Label It, cheered Vermont's law as a "historic victory" and said that opponents "will not prevail." Rather, the win in Vermont will catalyze the movement and "hasten similar labeling bills across the country and ultimately at the federal level. This is what citizens want," he stated.
Echoing Hirshber, Ronnie Cummins, national director of the Organic Consumers Association, stated that "[w]e will not back down. This movement is here to stay."
______________________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.