SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Decades Later, FDA Takes Action on Safety of Antibacterial Soaps
“FDA is finally taking concerns about triclosan seriously."
Dec 16, 2013
Commonly used antibacterial soaps are no better at killing germs than washing with plain soap and water, but may harm health and contribute to making bacteria resistant to antibiotics, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Monday.
"New data suggest that the risks associated with long-term, daily use of antibacterial soaps may outweigh the benefits," Colleen Rogers, Ph.D., a lead microbiologist at FDA, said in a statement.
In its proposed rule issued Monday, the FDA states that makers of antibacterial soaps and body washes must now demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of those products, noting:
Several important scientific developments that affect the safety evaluation of these ingredients have occurred since FDA's 1994 evaluation of the safety of consumer antiseptic active ingredients under the OTC Drug Review. New data suggest that the systemic exposure to these active ingredients is higher than previously thought, and new information about the potential risks from systemic absorption and long-term exposure have become available. New safety information also suggests that widespread antiseptic use can have an impact on the development of bacterial resistance.
Environmental and public health watchdog groups have long sounded the alarm about triclosan, a common anti-bacterial agent.
In 2008, Environmental Working Group found that
Triclosan has been linked to cancer in lab animals, has been targeted for removal from some stores in Europe for its health and environmental risks, and the American Medical Association recommends against its use in the home. It is also linked to liver and inhalation toxicity, and low levels of triclosan may disrupt the thyroid hormone system. Thyroid hormones are essential to proper growth and development, particularly for brain growth in utero and during infancy.
Triclosan breaks down into very toxic chemicals, including a form of dioxin; methyl triclosan, which is acutely toxic to aquatic life; and chloroform, a carcinogen formed when triclosan mixes with tap water that has been treated with chlorine. Scientists surveyed 85 U.S. rivers and streams, and found traces of triclosan in more than half.
Other studies indicate that it contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
According to reporting by Bloomberg, "Chemicals like triclosan were never intended for mass consumer use."
The FDA first proposed removing triclosan from some products 35 years ago, the Natural Resources Defense Council points out, but no final action from the FDA meant its use continued and grew.
In 2010, the NRDC sued the agency to make it issue a final rule on triclosan. Monday's proposal comes as a result of a settlement from that lawsuit.
"This is a good first step toward getting unsafe triclosan off the market," said Mae Wu, an attorney in NRDC's health program. "FDA is finally taking concerns about triclosan seriously."
While the proposed rule covers soaps and body washes, it leaves out products that don't use water like antibacterial wipes and sanitizers. The group Safer Chemicals Healthy Families points out that triclosan is widespread, and may also appear in products like toothpaste, cutting boards, yoga mats, textiles and household cleaners.
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Commonly used antibacterial soaps are no better at killing germs than washing with plain soap and water, but may harm health and contribute to making bacteria resistant to antibiotics, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Monday.
"New data suggest that the risks associated with long-term, daily use of antibacterial soaps may outweigh the benefits," Colleen Rogers, Ph.D., a lead microbiologist at FDA, said in a statement.
In its proposed rule issued Monday, the FDA states that makers of antibacterial soaps and body washes must now demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of those products, noting:
Several important scientific developments that affect the safety evaluation of these ingredients have occurred since FDA's 1994 evaluation of the safety of consumer antiseptic active ingredients under the OTC Drug Review. New data suggest that the systemic exposure to these active ingredients is higher than previously thought, and new information about the potential risks from systemic absorption and long-term exposure have become available. New safety information also suggests that widespread antiseptic use can have an impact on the development of bacterial resistance.
Environmental and public health watchdog groups have long sounded the alarm about triclosan, a common anti-bacterial agent.
In 2008, Environmental Working Group found that
Triclosan has been linked to cancer in lab animals, has been targeted for removal from some stores in Europe for its health and environmental risks, and the American Medical Association recommends against its use in the home. It is also linked to liver and inhalation toxicity, and low levels of triclosan may disrupt the thyroid hormone system. Thyroid hormones are essential to proper growth and development, particularly for brain growth in utero and during infancy.
Triclosan breaks down into very toxic chemicals, including a form of dioxin; methyl triclosan, which is acutely toxic to aquatic life; and chloroform, a carcinogen formed when triclosan mixes with tap water that has been treated with chlorine. Scientists surveyed 85 U.S. rivers and streams, and found traces of triclosan in more than half.
Other studies indicate that it contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
According to reporting by Bloomberg, "Chemicals like triclosan were never intended for mass consumer use."
The FDA first proposed removing triclosan from some products 35 years ago, the Natural Resources Defense Council points out, but no final action from the FDA meant its use continued and grew.
In 2010, the NRDC sued the agency to make it issue a final rule on triclosan. Monday's proposal comes as a result of a settlement from that lawsuit.
"This is a good first step toward getting unsafe triclosan off the market," said Mae Wu, an attorney in NRDC's health program. "FDA is finally taking concerns about triclosan seriously."
While the proposed rule covers soaps and body washes, it leaves out products that don't use water like antibacterial wipes and sanitizers. The group Safer Chemicals Healthy Families points out that triclosan is widespread, and may also appear in products like toothpaste, cutting boards, yoga mats, textiles and household cleaners.
_____________________
Commonly used antibacterial soaps are no better at killing germs than washing with plain soap and water, but may harm health and contribute to making bacteria resistant to antibiotics, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced Monday.
"New data suggest that the risks associated with long-term, daily use of antibacterial soaps may outweigh the benefits," Colleen Rogers, Ph.D., a lead microbiologist at FDA, said in a statement.
In its proposed rule issued Monday, the FDA states that makers of antibacterial soaps and body washes must now demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of those products, noting:
Several important scientific developments that affect the safety evaluation of these ingredients have occurred since FDA's 1994 evaluation of the safety of consumer antiseptic active ingredients under the OTC Drug Review. New data suggest that the systemic exposure to these active ingredients is higher than previously thought, and new information about the potential risks from systemic absorption and long-term exposure have become available. New safety information also suggests that widespread antiseptic use can have an impact on the development of bacterial resistance.
Environmental and public health watchdog groups have long sounded the alarm about triclosan, a common anti-bacterial agent.
In 2008, Environmental Working Group found that
Triclosan has been linked to cancer in lab animals, has been targeted for removal from some stores in Europe for its health and environmental risks, and the American Medical Association recommends against its use in the home. It is also linked to liver and inhalation toxicity, and low levels of triclosan may disrupt the thyroid hormone system. Thyroid hormones are essential to proper growth and development, particularly for brain growth in utero and during infancy.
Triclosan breaks down into very toxic chemicals, including a form of dioxin; methyl triclosan, which is acutely toxic to aquatic life; and chloroform, a carcinogen formed when triclosan mixes with tap water that has been treated with chlorine. Scientists surveyed 85 U.S. rivers and streams, and found traces of triclosan in more than half.
Other studies indicate that it contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
According to reporting by Bloomberg, "Chemicals like triclosan were never intended for mass consumer use."
The FDA first proposed removing triclosan from some products 35 years ago, the Natural Resources Defense Council points out, but no final action from the FDA meant its use continued and grew.
In 2010, the NRDC sued the agency to make it issue a final rule on triclosan. Monday's proposal comes as a result of a settlement from that lawsuit.
"This is a good first step toward getting unsafe triclosan off the market," said Mae Wu, an attorney in NRDC's health program. "FDA is finally taking concerns about triclosan seriously."
While the proposed rule covers soaps and body washes, it leaves out products that don't use water like antibacterial wipes and sanitizers. The group Safer Chemicals Healthy Families points out that triclosan is widespread, and may also appear in products like toothpaste, cutting boards, yoga mats, textiles and household cleaners.
_____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.