SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Hastening Climate Change, Worldwide Coal Consumption to Increase Within 5 Years
China, India expected to lead consumption by 2017
Dec 18, 2012
Only weeks after climate change talks in Doha produced no significant plan to address climate change, the International Energy Agency said Tuesday that coal will likely rival oil as the world's largest source of energy within five years, dramatically increasing global warming.
The report, released Tuesday by the IEA, states that while the growth of coal use is slowing "from the breakneck pace of the last decade," global consumption by 2017 will likely increase by 1.2 billion metric tons--the amount currently consumed annually by the US and Russia alone.
Tom Zeller Jr. of the Huffington Post cites statistics from the US Energy Information Administration that coal is the leading source of planet warming emissions, accounting for more than 40 percent of all emissions, with that figure expected to increase to nearly half of global emissions over the next 25 years.
Daniel Kessler, a spokesman for the climate action group 350.org, said:
Coal use can't be like a bump in a rug, moving from one spot to another. The reality is that we need to keep 80 percent of all fossil fuels underground if we are going to avoid the worst impacts from climate change. And that can only happen if we work across borders in a unified front against the fossil fuel industry, whose business model is dependent on cooking the planet.
The use of coal has increased even in European countries that have pledged to reduce emissions, The Guardian reports, because an emissions trading program has failed. The program
"was supposed to discourage high-carbon power generation by imposing a price on carbon dioxide emissions. This was done through issuing generators and energy-intensive companies with a set quota of emissions permits, requiring them to buy extra permits if they needed to emit more than their allowance. But an over-allocation, coupled with the effects of the financial crisis and recession, have led to a large surplus of permits on the market, that has in turn led to a plunge in permit prices. At current levels, of a few euros per tonne of carbon, there is little incentive to seek out lower carbon fuels, and coal is enjoying a renaissance in Europe."
The report is likely to anger advocates for action on climate change, Zeller reports. He adds that the lack of action on climate change policy "is making it exceedingly likely that global average temperatures will rise beyond levels that countries had previously agreed it would be best to avoid."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Only weeks after climate change talks in Doha produced no significant plan to address climate change, the International Energy Agency said Tuesday that coal will likely rival oil as the world's largest source of energy within five years, dramatically increasing global warming.
The report, released Tuesday by the IEA, states that while the growth of coal use is slowing "from the breakneck pace of the last decade," global consumption by 2017 will likely increase by 1.2 billion metric tons--the amount currently consumed annually by the US and Russia alone.
Tom Zeller Jr. of the Huffington Post cites statistics from the US Energy Information Administration that coal is the leading source of planet warming emissions, accounting for more than 40 percent of all emissions, with that figure expected to increase to nearly half of global emissions over the next 25 years.
Daniel Kessler, a spokesman for the climate action group 350.org, said:
Coal use can't be like a bump in a rug, moving from one spot to another. The reality is that we need to keep 80 percent of all fossil fuels underground if we are going to avoid the worst impacts from climate change. And that can only happen if we work across borders in a unified front against the fossil fuel industry, whose business model is dependent on cooking the planet.
The use of coal has increased even in European countries that have pledged to reduce emissions, The Guardian reports, because an emissions trading program has failed. The program
"was supposed to discourage high-carbon power generation by imposing a price on carbon dioxide emissions. This was done through issuing generators and energy-intensive companies with a set quota of emissions permits, requiring them to buy extra permits if they needed to emit more than their allowance. But an over-allocation, coupled with the effects of the financial crisis and recession, have led to a large surplus of permits on the market, that has in turn led to a plunge in permit prices. At current levels, of a few euros per tonne of carbon, there is little incentive to seek out lower carbon fuels, and coal is enjoying a renaissance in Europe."
The report is likely to anger advocates for action on climate change, Zeller reports. He adds that the lack of action on climate change policy "is making it exceedingly likely that global average temperatures will rise beyond levels that countries had previously agreed it would be best to avoid."
Only weeks after climate change talks in Doha produced no significant plan to address climate change, the International Energy Agency said Tuesday that coal will likely rival oil as the world's largest source of energy within five years, dramatically increasing global warming.
The report, released Tuesday by the IEA, states that while the growth of coal use is slowing "from the breakneck pace of the last decade," global consumption by 2017 will likely increase by 1.2 billion metric tons--the amount currently consumed annually by the US and Russia alone.
Tom Zeller Jr. of the Huffington Post cites statistics from the US Energy Information Administration that coal is the leading source of planet warming emissions, accounting for more than 40 percent of all emissions, with that figure expected to increase to nearly half of global emissions over the next 25 years.
Daniel Kessler, a spokesman for the climate action group 350.org, said:
Coal use can't be like a bump in a rug, moving from one spot to another. The reality is that we need to keep 80 percent of all fossil fuels underground if we are going to avoid the worst impacts from climate change. And that can only happen if we work across borders in a unified front against the fossil fuel industry, whose business model is dependent on cooking the planet.
The use of coal has increased even in European countries that have pledged to reduce emissions, The Guardian reports, because an emissions trading program has failed. The program
"was supposed to discourage high-carbon power generation by imposing a price on carbon dioxide emissions. This was done through issuing generators and energy-intensive companies with a set quota of emissions permits, requiring them to buy extra permits if they needed to emit more than their allowance. But an over-allocation, coupled with the effects of the financial crisis and recession, have led to a large surplus of permits on the market, that has in turn led to a plunge in permit prices. At current levels, of a few euros per tonne of carbon, there is little incentive to seek out lower carbon fuels, and coal is enjoying a renaissance in Europe."
The report is likely to anger advocates for action on climate change, Zeller reports. He adds that the lack of action on climate change policy "is making it exceedingly likely that global average temperatures will rise beyond levels that countries had previously agreed it would be best to avoid."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.