SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In Response to War-Weary Nation, Senate Votes to Hasten Afghan Withdrawal
Pentagon continues to push for longer occupation
Nov 30, 2012
The U.S. Senate has voted overwhelmingly for an accelerated withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan while the Pentagon continues to ignore the desires of a war-weary nation by calling for an extension of the Obama administration's current timetable.
Thursday's bipartisan vote of 62-33 sends a clear message to the President as he and his military chiefs "engage in high-stakes talks about the pace of drawing down the 66,000 US troops there" in advance of a White House announcement expected within weeks, AP reports.
The vote was on a nonbinding amendment to a defense policy bill that endorsed the current timetable to withdraw all combat troops by the end of 2014 but pressed for a quicker pace, without specifying how that would be achieved.
"It is time to end this war, end the longest war in United States history,'' said Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR), the chief sponsor of the measure.
As the senators engaged in the significant albeit symbolic vote, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta continued his assertion that the U.S. needs to keep troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014 citing a still dangerous al-Qaeda presence in the country.
"The goal here is an enduring presence therefore that will direct itself toward three important missions. One is obviously counterterrorism to insure that we continue to go after whatever al-Qaida targets remain in Afghanistan," Panetta told reporters at a news conference.
Panetta would not say how many American troops he thinks will be needed to conduct that mission, nor did he mention a time period.
According to Al Jazeera, the other two post-2014 missions cited by Panetta are training Afghan security forces and providing support for the US military contingent there.
The Senate hopes to wrap up its version of the bill by the end of the week before going through negotiations with the House legislation which was passed in May.
AP reports:
The overall defense bill authorizes $631 billion for weapons, ships, aircraft and a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. The White House threatened to veto the legislation in its current form, citing limits on the president's authority in handling detainees at the U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and restrictions on cuts to the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve.
The Senate also revisited last year's debate on the handling of terror suspects. According to AP, lawmakers voted 54-41 to approve an amendment that would prevent the transfer of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay to prisons in the United States.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. Senate has voted overwhelmingly for an accelerated withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan while the Pentagon continues to ignore the desires of a war-weary nation by calling for an extension of the Obama administration's current timetable.
Thursday's bipartisan vote of 62-33 sends a clear message to the President as he and his military chiefs "engage in high-stakes talks about the pace of drawing down the 66,000 US troops there" in advance of a White House announcement expected within weeks, AP reports.
The vote was on a nonbinding amendment to a defense policy bill that endorsed the current timetable to withdraw all combat troops by the end of 2014 but pressed for a quicker pace, without specifying how that would be achieved.
"It is time to end this war, end the longest war in United States history,'' said Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR), the chief sponsor of the measure.
As the senators engaged in the significant albeit symbolic vote, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta continued his assertion that the U.S. needs to keep troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014 citing a still dangerous al-Qaeda presence in the country.
"The goal here is an enduring presence therefore that will direct itself toward three important missions. One is obviously counterterrorism to insure that we continue to go after whatever al-Qaida targets remain in Afghanistan," Panetta told reporters at a news conference.
Panetta would not say how many American troops he thinks will be needed to conduct that mission, nor did he mention a time period.
According to Al Jazeera, the other two post-2014 missions cited by Panetta are training Afghan security forces and providing support for the US military contingent there.
The Senate hopes to wrap up its version of the bill by the end of the week before going through negotiations with the House legislation which was passed in May.
AP reports:
The overall defense bill authorizes $631 billion for weapons, ships, aircraft and a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. The White House threatened to veto the legislation in its current form, citing limits on the president's authority in handling detainees at the U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and restrictions on cuts to the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve.
The Senate also revisited last year's debate on the handling of terror suspects. According to AP, lawmakers voted 54-41 to approve an amendment that would prevent the transfer of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay to prisons in the United States.
The U.S. Senate has voted overwhelmingly for an accelerated withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan while the Pentagon continues to ignore the desires of a war-weary nation by calling for an extension of the Obama administration's current timetable.
Thursday's bipartisan vote of 62-33 sends a clear message to the President as he and his military chiefs "engage in high-stakes talks about the pace of drawing down the 66,000 US troops there" in advance of a White House announcement expected within weeks, AP reports.
The vote was on a nonbinding amendment to a defense policy bill that endorsed the current timetable to withdraw all combat troops by the end of 2014 but pressed for a quicker pace, without specifying how that would be achieved.
"It is time to end this war, end the longest war in United States history,'' said Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR), the chief sponsor of the measure.
As the senators engaged in the significant albeit symbolic vote, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta continued his assertion that the U.S. needs to keep troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014 citing a still dangerous al-Qaeda presence in the country.
"The goal here is an enduring presence therefore that will direct itself toward three important missions. One is obviously counterterrorism to insure that we continue to go after whatever al-Qaida targets remain in Afghanistan," Panetta told reporters at a news conference.
Panetta would not say how many American troops he thinks will be needed to conduct that mission, nor did he mention a time period.
According to Al Jazeera, the other two post-2014 missions cited by Panetta are training Afghan security forces and providing support for the US military contingent there.
The Senate hopes to wrap up its version of the bill by the end of the week before going through negotiations with the House legislation which was passed in May.
AP reports:
The overall defense bill authorizes $631 billion for weapons, ships, aircraft and a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. The White House threatened to veto the legislation in its current form, citing limits on the president's authority in handling detainees at the U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and restrictions on cuts to the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve.
The Senate also revisited last year's debate on the handling of terror suspects. According to AP, lawmakers voted 54-41 to approve an amendment that would prevent the transfer of detainees held at Guantanamo Bay to prisons in the United States.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.