

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Iranian nuclear capabilities negotiations began on Saturday in Istanbul between Iran's representatives and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (America, Britain, France, Russia and China) and also Germany, or P5 plus 1.
As the talks began today, officials reported a significant 'optimism' and 'positive' atmosphere.
However, little has been released as to the content of the talks as well as the future implications.
Many diplomats were hoping that Iran would offer a moratorium on production of both low-enriched uranium -- at 3.5 percent strength -- and of uranium enriched to 20 percent, but the incentives the major powers were planning to offer remain undisclosed.
"Whether a second round of talks would succeed remains to be seen, however, with Iran likely to insist on the right to a peaceful nuclear program while demanding sanctions be eased," reports Reuters.
No solid agreements have been made as the US previously stated it would demand the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility.
Iran, has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is a peaceful attempt to generate electricity and medical isotopes for cancer patients.
Reports have surfaced that the US requested a one-on-one, or bilateral, discussion with Iran. The request was turned down, but the multilateral talks continued.
As Tom Engelhardt stated this week, "There are small signs of possible future compromise on both sides when it comes to Iran's nuclear program (and a semi-public demand from Washington that could be an instant deal-breaker). Looking at the big picture, though, there's a remarkable amount we simply don't know about Washington's highly militarized policy toward Iran."
* * *
Agence France-Presse: Iran spurns US request for bilateral nuclear talks: source
Iran's delegation to crunch talks with world powers on its nuclear programme Saturday turned down a US request for what would have been a rare bilateral meeting on the sidelines, a source told AFP.
"Their request was presented numerous times but Iran has refused," said the source close to the Islamic republic's team at the talks with six world powers in Istanbul, which diplomats said were nonetheless going well.
Earlier diplomats at the talks had said that the US delegation led by Wendy Sherman, undersecretary for political affairs, had let Iran know she was ready for face-to-face discussions with her counterpart Saeed Jalili.
The message was passed to the Iranians by Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, on the sidelines of the discussions between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, envoys said.
* * *
McClatchy News: After 'constructive' talks on Iran nuclear program, hopes rise for diplomacy
Major world powers Saturday said their first meeting with Iran in over a year took place in a "constructive atmosphere," boosting hopes for a new round of negotiations to tackle the long-running dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, which Western countries fear could lead to production of an atomic bomb.
Iran's delegation, headed by chief negotiator Saeed Jalili, met a delegation of the United States and five other countries, headed by Dame Catherine Ashton of Britain, for two-and-a-half hours Saturday morning, according to Michael Mann, Ashton's spokesman. He said the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia were "satisfied" with the talks, particularly in contrast to the last meeting here in January 2011, "which didn't go anywhere."
"Last year, they weren't constructive," he told reporters. "The very fact (the Iranians are) engaging is progress over last year."
Among the topics discussed at the morning meeting in Istanbul's Congress center was the plan for a follow-up meeting in Baghdad, Iraq. Mann said a final decision will be reached in a second meeting with all parties late Saturday afternoon.
* * *
Reuters: World powers seek to ease nuclear deadlock with Iran
Iran and six world powers began rare talks on Saturday to try to halt a downward diplomatic spiral over Tehran's nuclear program and ease fears of a new Middle East war.
The talks, in Istanbul, the first between Iran and the six powers in 15 months, are unlikely to yield any major breakthrough but Western diplomats hope to see readiness from Tehran to start to discuss issues of substance.
That, they say, would mark a big change in Iran's attitude from the last meeting when it refused even to talk about its nuclear program and could be enough for scheduling a second round of talks next month, possibly in Baghdad.
Such an outcome could, at least for the time being, dampen speculation that Israel might launch military strikes on Iranian atomic sites to prevent its enemy from obtaining nuclear arms.
# # #
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Iranian nuclear capabilities negotiations began on Saturday in Istanbul between Iran's representatives and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (America, Britain, France, Russia and China) and also Germany, or P5 plus 1.
As the talks began today, officials reported a significant 'optimism' and 'positive' atmosphere.
However, little has been released as to the content of the talks as well as the future implications.
Many diplomats were hoping that Iran would offer a moratorium on production of both low-enriched uranium -- at 3.5 percent strength -- and of uranium enriched to 20 percent, but the incentives the major powers were planning to offer remain undisclosed.
"Whether a second round of talks would succeed remains to be seen, however, with Iran likely to insist on the right to a peaceful nuclear program while demanding sanctions be eased," reports Reuters.
No solid agreements have been made as the US previously stated it would demand the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility.
Iran, has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is a peaceful attempt to generate electricity and medical isotopes for cancer patients.
Reports have surfaced that the US requested a one-on-one, or bilateral, discussion with Iran. The request was turned down, but the multilateral talks continued.
As Tom Engelhardt stated this week, "There are small signs of possible future compromise on both sides when it comes to Iran's nuclear program (and a semi-public demand from Washington that could be an instant deal-breaker). Looking at the big picture, though, there's a remarkable amount we simply don't know about Washington's highly militarized policy toward Iran."
* * *
Agence France-Presse: Iran spurns US request for bilateral nuclear talks: source
Iran's delegation to crunch talks with world powers on its nuclear programme Saturday turned down a US request for what would have been a rare bilateral meeting on the sidelines, a source told AFP.
"Their request was presented numerous times but Iran has refused," said the source close to the Islamic republic's team at the talks with six world powers in Istanbul, which diplomats said were nonetheless going well.
Earlier diplomats at the talks had said that the US delegation led by Wendy Sherman, undersecretary for political affairs, had let Iran know she was ready for face-to-face discussions with her counterpart Saeed Jalili.
The message was passed to the Iranians by Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, on the sidelines of the discussions between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, envoys said.
* * *
McClatchy News: After 'constructive' talks on Iran nuclear program, hopes rise for diplomacy
Major world powers Saturday said their first meeting with Iran in over a year took place in a "constructive atmosphere," boosting hopes for a new round of negotiations to tackle the long-running dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, which Western countries fear could lead to production of an atomic bomb.
Iran's delegation, headed by chief negotiator Saeed Jalili, met a delegation of the United States and five other countries, headed by Dame Catherine Ashton of Britain, for two-and-a-half hours Saturday morning, according to Michael Mann, Ashton's spokesman. He said the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia were "satisfied" with the talks, particularly in contrast to the last meeting here in January 2011, "which didn't go anywhere."
"Last year, they weren't constructive," he told reporters. "The very fact (the Iranians are) engaging is progress over last year."
Among the topics discussed at the morning meeting in Istanbul's Congress center was the plan for a follow-up meeting in Baghdad, Iraq. Mann said a final decision will be reached in a second meeting with all parties late Saturday afternoon.
* * *
Reuters: World powers seek to ease nuclear deadlock with Iran
Iran and six world powers began rare talks on Saturday to try to halt a downward diplomatic spiral over Tehran's nuclear program and ease fears of a new Middle East war.
The talks, in Istanbul, the first between Iran and the six powers in 15 months, are unlikely to yield any major breakthrough but Western diplomats hope to see readiness from Tehran to start to discuss issues of substance.
That, they say, would mark a big change in Iran's attitude from the last meeting when it refused even to talk about its nuclear program and could be enough for scheduling a second round of talks next month, possibly in Baghdad.
Such an outcome could, at least for the time being, dampen speculation that Israel might launch military strikes on Iranian atomic sites to prevent its enemy from obtaining nuclear arms.
# # #
Iranian nuclear capabilities negotiations began on Saturday in Istanbul between Iran's representatives and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (America, Britain, France, Russia and China) and also Germany, or P5 plus 1.
As the talks began today, officials reported a significant 'optimism' and 'positive' atmosphere.
However, little has been released as to the content of the talks as well as the future implications.
Many diplomats were hoping that Iran would offer a moratorium on production of both low-enriched uranium -- at 3.5 percent strength -- and of uranium enriched to 20 percent, but the incentives the major powers were planning to offer remain undisclosed.
"Whether a second round of talks would succeed remains to be seen, however, with Iran likely to insist on the right to a peaceful nuclear program while demanding sanctions be eased," reports Reuters.
No solid agreements have been made as the US previously stated it would demand the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility.
Iran, has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is a peaceful attempt to generate electricity and medical isotopes for cancer patients.
Reports have surfaced that the US requested a one-on-one, or bilateral, discussion with Iran. The request was turned down, but the multilateral talks continued.
As Tom Engelhardt stated this week, "There are small signs of possible future compromise on both sides when it comes to Iran's nuclear program (and a semi-public demand from Washington that could be an instant deal-breaker). Looking at the big picture, though, there's a remarkable amount we simply don't know about Washington's highly militarized policy toward Iran."
* * *
Agence France-Presse: Iran spurns US request for bilateral nuclear talks: source
Iran's delegation to crunch talks with world powers on its nuclear programme Saturday turned down a US request for what would have been a rare bilateral meeting on the sidelines, a source told AFP.
"Their request was presented numerous times but Iran has refused," said the source close to the Islamic republic's team at the talks with six world powers in Istanbul, which diplomats said were nonetheless going well.
Earlier diplomats at the talks had said that the US delegation led by Wendy Sherman, undersecretary for political affairs, had let Iran know she was ready for face-to-face discussions with her counterpart Saeed Jalili.
The message was passed to the Iranians by Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, on the sidelines of the discussions between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, envoys said.
* * *
McClatchy News: After 'constructive' talks on Iran nuclear program, hopes rise for diplomacy
Major world powers Saturday said their first meeting with Iran in over a year took place in a "constructive atmosphere," boosting hopes for a new round of negotiations to tackle the long-running dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, which Western countries fear could lead to production of an atomic bomb.
Iran's delegation, headed by chief negotiator Saeed Jalili, met a delegation of the United States and five other countries, headed by Dame Catherine Ashton of Britain, for two-and-a-half hours Saturday morning, according to Michael Mann, Ashton's spokesman. He said the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia were "satisfied" with the talks, particularly in contrast to the last meeting here in January 2011, "which didn't go anywhere."
"Last year, they weren't constructive," he told reporters. "The very fact (the Iranians are) engaging is progress over last year."
Among the topics discussed at the morning meeting in Istanbul's Congress center was the plan for a follow-up meeting in Baghdad, Iraq. Mann said a final decision will be reached in a second meeting with all parties late Saturday afternoon.
* * *
Reuters: World powers seek to ease nuclear deadlock with Iran
Iran and six world powers began rare talks on Saturday to try to halt a downward diplomatic spiral over Tehran's nuclear program and ease fears of a new Middle East war.
The talks, in Istanbul, the first between Iran and the six powers in 15 months, are unlikely to yield any major breakthrough but Western diplomats hope to see readiness from Tehran to start to discuss issues of substance.
That, they say, would mark a big change in Iran's attitude from the last meeting when it refused even to talk about its nuclear program and could be enough for scheduling a second round of talks next month, possibly in Baghdad.
Such an outcome could, at least for the time being, dampen speculation that Israel might launch military strikes on Iranian atomic sites to prevent its enemy from obtaining nuclear arms.
# # #