

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Iranian nuclear capabilities negotiations began on Saturday in Istanbul between Iran's representatives and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (America, Britain, France, Russia and China) and also Germany, or P5 plus 1.
As the talks began today, officials reported a significant 'optimism' and 'positive' atmosphere.
However, little has been released as to the content of the talks as well as the future implications.
Many diplomats were hoping that Iran would offer a moratorium on production of both low-enriched uranium -- at 3.5 percent strength -- and of uranium enriched to 20 percent, but the incentives the major powers were planning to offer remain undisclosed.
"Whether a second round of talks would succeed remains to be seen, however, with Iran likely to insist on the right to a peaceful nuclear program while demanding sanctions be eased," reports Reuters.
No solid agreements have been made as the US previously stated it would demand the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility.
Iran, has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is a peaceful attempt to generate electricity and medical isotopes for cancer patients.
Reports have surfaced that the US requested a one-on-one, or bilateral, discussion with Iran. The request was turned down, but the multilateral talks continued.
As Tom Engelhardt stated this week, "There are small signs of possible future compromise on both sides when it comes to Iran's nuclear program (and a semi-public demand from Washington that could be an instant deal-breaker). Looking at the big picture, though, there's a remarkable amount we simply don't know about Washington's highly militarized policy toward Iran."
* * *
Agence France-Presse: Iran spurns US request for bilateral nuclear talks: source
Iran's delegation to crunch talks with world powers on its nuclear programme Saturday turned down a US request for what would have been a rare bilateral meeting on the sidelines, a source told AFP.
"Their request was presented numerous times but Iran has refused," said the source close to the Islamic republic's team at the talks with six world powers in Istanbul, which diplomats said were nonetheless going well.
Earlier diplomats at the talks had said that the US delegation led by Wendy Sherman, undersecretary for political affairs, had let Iran know she was ready for face-to-face discussions with her counterpart Saeed Jalili.
The message was passed to the Iranians by Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, on the sidelines of the discussions between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, envoys said.
* * *
McClatchy News: After 'constructive' talks on Iran nuclear program, hopes rise for diplomacy
Major world powers Saturday said their first meeting with Iran in over a year took place in a "constructive atmosphere," boosting hopes for a new round of negotiations to tackle the long-running dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, which Western countries fear could lead to production of an atomic bomb.
Iran's delegation, headed by chief negotiator Saeed Jalili, met a delegation of the United States and five other countries, headed by Dame Catherine Ashton of Britain, for two-and-a-half hours Saturday morning, according to Michael Mann, Ashton's spokesman. He said the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia were "satisfied" with the talks, particularly in contrast to the last meeting here in January 2011, "which didn't go anywhere."
"Last year, they weren't constructive," he told reporters. "The very fact (the Iranians are) engaging is progress over last year."
Among the topics discussed at the morning meeting in Istanbul's Congress center was the plan for a follow-up meeting in Baghdad, Iraq. Mann said a final decision will be reached in a second meeting with all parties late Saturday afternoon.
* * *
Reuters: World powers seek to ease nuclear deadlock with Iran
Iran and six world powers began rare talks on Saturday to try to halt a downward diplomatic spiral over Tehran's nuclear program and ease fears of a new Middle East war.
The talks, in Istanbul, the first between Iran and the six powers in 15 months, are unlikely to yield any major breakthrough but Western diplomats hope to see readiness from Tehran to start to discuss issues of substance.
That, they say, would mark a big change in Iran's attitude from the last meeting when it refused even to talk about its nuclear program and could be enough for scheduling a second round of talks next month, possibly in Baghdad.
Such an outcome could, at least for the time being, dampen speculation that Israel might launch military strikes on Iranian atomic sites to prevent its enemy from obtaining nuclear arms.
# # #
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Iranian nuclear capabilities negotiations began on Saturday in Istanbul between Iran's representatives and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (America, Britain, France, Russia and China) and also Germany, or P5 plus 1.
As the talks began today, officials reported a significant 'optimism' and 'positive' atmosphere.
However, little has been released as to the content of the talks as well as the future implications.
Many diplomats were hoping that Iran would offer a moratorium on production of both low-enriched uranium -- at 3.5 percent strength -- and of uranium enriched to 20 percent, but the incentives the major powers were planning to offer remain undisclosed.
"Whether a second round of talks would succeed remains to be seen, however, with Iran likely to insist on the right to a peaceful nuclear program while demanding sanctions be eased," reports Reuters.
No solid agreements have been made as the US previously stated it would demand the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility.
Iran, has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is a peaceful attempt to generate electricity and medical isotopes for cancer patients.
Reports have surfaced that the US requested a one-on-one, or bilateral, discussion with Iran. The request was turned down, but the multilateral talks continued.
As Tom Engelhardt stated this week, "There are small signs of possible future compromise on both sides when it comes to Iran's nuclear program (and a semi-public demand from Washington that could be an instant deal-breaker). Looking at the big picture, though, there's a remarkable amount we simply don't know about Washington's highly militarized policy toward Iran."
* * *
Agence France-Presse: Iran spurns US request for bilateral nuclear talks: source
Iran's delegation to crunch talks with world powers on its nuclear programme Saturday turned down a US request for what would have been a rare bilateral meeting on the sidelines, a source told AFP.
"Their request was presented numerous times but Iran has refused," said the source close to the Islamic republic's team at the talks with six world powers in Istanbul, which diplomats said were nonetheless going well.
Earlier diplomats at the talks had said that the US delegation led by Wendy Sherman, undersecretary for political affairs, had let Iran know she was ready for face-to-face discussions with her counterpart Saeed Jalili.
The message was passed to the Iranians by Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, on the sidelines of the discussions between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, envoys said.
* * *
McClatchy News: After 'constructive' talks on Iran nuclear program, hopes rise for diplomacy
Major world powers Saturday said their first meeting with Iran in over a year took place in a "constructive atmosphere," boosting hopes for a new round of negotiations to tackle the long-running dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, which Western countries fear could lead to production of an atomic bomb.
Iran's delegation, headed by chief negotiator Saeed Jalili, met a delegation of the United States and five other countries, headed by Dame Catherine Ashton of Britain, for two-and-a-half hours Saturday morning, according to Michael Mann, Ashton's spokesman. He said the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia were "satisfied" with the talks, particularly in contrast to the last meeting here in January 2011, "which didn't go anywhere."
"Last year, they weren't constructive," he told reporters. "The very fact (the Iranians are) engaging is progress over last year."
Among the topics discussed at the morning meeting in Istanbul's Congress center was the plan for a follow-up meeting in Baghdad, Iraq. Mann said a final decision will be reached in a second meeting with all parties late Saturday afternoon.
* * *
Reuters: World powers seek to ease nuclear deadlock with Iran
Iran and six world powers began rare talks on Saturday to try to halt a downward diplomatic spiral over Tehran's nuclear program and ease fears of a new Middle East war.
The talks, in Istanbul, the first between Iran and the six powers in 15 months, are unlikely to yield any major breakthrough but Western diplomats hope to see readiness from Tehran to start to discuss issues of substance.
That, they say, would mark a big change in Iran's attitude from the last meeting when it refused even to talk about its nuclear program and could be enough for scheduling a second round of talks next month, possibly in Baghdad.
Such an outcome could, at least for the time being, dampen speculation that Israel might launch military strikes on Iranian atomic sites to prevent its enemy from obtaining nuclear arms.
# # #
Iranian nuclear capabilities negotiations began on Saturday in Istanbul between Iran's representatives and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (America, Britain, France, Russia and China) and also Germany, or P5 plus 1.
As the talks began today, officials reported a significant 'optimism' and 'positive' atmosphere.
However, little has been released as to the content of the talks as well as the future implications.
Many diplomats were hoping that Iran would offer a moratorium on production of both low-enriched uranium -- at 3.5 percent strength -- and of uranium enriched to 20 percent, but the incentives the major powers were planning to offer remain undisclosed.
"Whether a second round of talks would succeed remains to be seen, however, with Iran likely to insist on the right to a peaceful nuclear program while demanding sanctions be eased," reports Reuters.
No solid agreements have been made as the US previously stated it would demand the immediate closing and ultimate dismantling of a recently completed nuclear facility.
Iran, has consistently maintained that its nuclear program is a peaceful attempt to generate electricity and medical isotopes for cancer patients.
Reports have surfaced that the US requested a one-on-one, or bilateral, discussion with Iran. The request was turned down, but the multilateral talks continued.
As Tom Engelhardt stated this week, "There are small signs of possible future compromise on both sides when it comes to Iran's nuclear program (and a semi-public demand from Washington that could be an instant deal-breaker). Looking at the big picture, though, there's a remarkable amount we simply don't know about Washington's highly militarized policy toward Iran."
* * *
Agence France-Presse: Iran spurns US request for bilateral nuclear talks: source
Iran's delegation to crunch talks with world powers on its nuclear programme Saturday turned down a US request for what would have been a rare bilateral meeting on the sidelines, a source told AFP.
"Their request was presented numerous times but Iran has refused," said the source close to the Islamic republic's team at the talks with six world powers in Istanbul, which diplomats said were nonetheless going well.
Earlier diplomats at the talks had said that the US delegation led by Wendy Sherman, undersecretary for political affairs, had let Iran know she was ready for face-to-face discussions with her counterpart Saeed Jalili.
The message was passed to the Iranians by Catherine Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, on the sidelines of the discussions between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, envoys said.
* * *
McClatchy News: After 'constructive' talks on Iran nuclear program, hopes rise for diplomacy
Major world powers Saturday said their first meeting with Iran in over a year took place in a "constructive atmosphere," boosting hopes for a new round of negotiations to tackle the long-running dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, which Western countries fear could lead to production of an atomic bomb.
Iran's delegation, headed by chief negotiator Saeed Jalili, met a delegation of the United States and five other countries, headed by Dame Catherine Ashton of Britain, for two-and-a-half hours Saturday morning, according to Michael Mann, Ashton's spokesman. He said the United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia were "satisfied" with the talks, particularly in contrast to the last meeting here in January 2011, "which didn't go anywhere."
"Last year, they weren't constructive," he told reporters. "The very fact (the Iranians are) engaging is progress over last year."
Among the topics discussed at the morning meeting in Istanbul's Congress center was the plan for a follow-up meeting in Baghdad, Iraq. Mann said a final decision will be reached in a second meeting with all parties late Saturday afternoon.
* * *
Reuters: World powers seek to ease nuclear deadlock with Iran
Iran and six world powers began rare talks on Saturday to try to halt a downward diplomatic spiral over Tehran's nuclear program and ease fears of a new Middle East war.
The talks, in Istanbul, the first between Iran and the six powers in 15 months, are unlikely to yield any major breakthrough but Western diplomats hope to see readiness from Tehran to start to discuss issues of substance.
That, they say, would mark a big change in Iran's attitude from the last meeting when it refused even to talk about its nuclear program and could be enough for scheduling a second round of talks next month, possibly in Baghdad.
Such an outcome could, at least for the time being, dampen speculation that Israel might launch military strikes on Iranian atomic sites to prevent its enemy from obtaining nuclear arms.
# # #