SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US 'to Expand Covert Operations'
The commander of the US forces in the Middle East
has signed an order that allows clandestine military activity to
disrupt "terror" groups or counter threats in friendly and hostile
nations, The New York Times says.
General David Petraeus, head of the US Central Command, signed the
secret directive on on September 30, the paper said quoting defence
officials and military documents.
May 25, 2010
The commander of the US forces in the Middle East
has signed an order that allows clandestine military activity to
disrupt "terror" groups or counter threats in friendly and hostile
nations, The New York Times says.
General David Petraeus, head of the US Central Command, signed the
secret directive on on September 30, the paper said quoting defence
officials and military documents.
It said the directive - which allows for covert
strikes outside of designated war zones - authorises the sending of US
special operations troops to the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn
of Africa to gather intelligence and build ties with local forces.
The seven-page directive, the paper said, appears
to authorise specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather
intelligence about the country's nuclear programme or identify dissident
groups that might be useful for a future military offensive.
Reconnaissance missions
According to the
New York Times, the order also permits reconnaissance that could
pave the way for possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its
nuclear ambitions escalate.
It said
that officials said that though the administration of George Bush, the
former US president, had approved some clandestine military activities
far from designated war zones, the new order was intended to make such
efforts more systematic and long term.
The paper said the order seeks to build networks that could
"penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy" al-Qaeda and other
"terror" groups.
It also seeks to "prepare the environment" for future attacks by US
or local military forces.
But the order does not appear to
authorise offensive strikes in any specific countries, the paper said.
In recent years the US has sought to
break its dependence on the Central Intelligence Agency and other spy
agencies for information in countries without a significant US troop
presence, according to the New York Times.
It said Petraeus's order is meant for small teams of US troops to
fill intelligence gaps about terror organisations plotting attacks
against Washington.
Risky venture
But some defence department officials, the paper said, worry that the
expanded role carries risks.
"The authorised activities could strain relationships with friendly
governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemen - which might allow the
operations but be loath to acknowledge their co-operation - or incite
the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria," the New York
Times reported.
"Many in the military are also concerned that as US troops assume
roles far from traditional combat, they would be at risk of being
treated as spies if captured and denied the Geneva Convention
protections afforded military detainees."
The paper said the precise operations that the directive authorises
are unclear and that what the military has done to follow through on the
order is not certain.
The paper did not name several government officials who described the
impetus for the order saying the document is classified.
It said spokesmen for the White House and the Pentagon declined to
comment on the signing of the order.
Source:
Agencies
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The commander of the US forces in the Middle East
has signed an order that allows clandestine military activity to
disrupt "terror" groups or counter threats in friendly and hostile
nations, The New York Times says.
General David Petraeus, head of the US Central Command, signed the
secret directive on on September 30, the paper said quoting defence
officials and military documents.
It said the directive - which allows for covert
strikes outside of designated war zones - authorises the sending of US
special operations troops to the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn
of Africa to gather intelligence and build ties with local forces.
The seven-page directive, the paper said, appears
to authorise specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather
intelligence about the country's nuclear programme or identify dissident
groups that might be useful for a future military offensive.
Reconnaissance missions
According to the
New York Times, the order also permits reconnaissance that could
pave the way for possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its
nuclear ambitions escalate.
It said
that officials said that though the administration of George Bush, the
former US president, had approved some clandestine military activities
far from designated war zones, the new order was intended to make such
efforts more systematic and long term.
The paper said the order seeks to build networks that could
"penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy" al-Qaeda and other
"terror" groups.
It also seeks to "prepare the environment" for future attacks by US
or local military forces.
But the order does not appear to
authorise offensive strikes in any specific countries, the paper said.
In recent years the US has sought to
break its dependence on the Central Intelligence Agency and other spy
agencies for information in countries without a significant US troop
presence, according to the New York Times.
It said Petraeus's order is meant for small teams of US troops to
fill intelligence gaps about terror organisations plotting attacks
against Washington.
Risky venture
But some defence department officials, the paper said, worry that the
expanded role carries risks.
"The authorised activities could strain relationships with friendly
governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemen - which might allow the
operations but be loath to acknowledge their co-operation - or incite
the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria," the New York
Times reported.
"Many in the military are also concerned that as US troops assume
roles far from traditional combat, they would be at risk of being
treated as spies if captured and denied the Geneva Convention
protections afforded military detainees."
The paper said the precise operations that the directive authorises
are unclear and that what the military has done to follow through on the
order is not certain.
The paper did not name several government officials who described the
impetus for the order saying the document is classified.
It said spokesmen for the White House and the Pentagon declined to
comment on the signing of the order.
Source:
Agencies
The commander of the US forces in the Middle East
has signed an order that allows clandestine military activity to
disrupt "terror" groups or counter threats in friendly and hostile
nations, The New York Times says.
General David Petraeus, head of the US Central Command, signed the
secret directive on on September 30, the paper said quoting defence
officials and military documents.
It said the directive - which allows for covert
strikes outside of designated war zones - authorises the sending of US
special operations troops to the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn
of Africa to gather intelligence and build ties with local forces.
The seven-page directive, the paper said, appears
to authorise specific operations in Iran, most likely to gather
intelligence about the country's nuclear programme or identify dissident
groups that might be useful for a future military offensive.
Reconnaissance missions
According to the
New York Times, the order also permits reconnaissance that could
pave the way for possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its
nuclear ambitions escalate.
It said
that officials said that though the administration of George Bush, the
former US president, had approved some clandestine military activities
far from designated war zones, the new order was intended to make such
efforts more systematic and long term.
The paper said the order seeks to build networks that could
"penetrate, disrupt, defeat or destroy" al-Qaeda and other
"terror" groups.
It also seeks to "prepare the environment" for future attacks by US
or local military forces.
But the order does not appear to
authorise offensive strikes in any specific countries, the paper said.
In recent years the US has sought to
break its dependence on the Central Intelligence Agency and other spy
agencies for information in countries without a significant US troop
presence, according to the New York Times.
It said Petraeus's order is meant for small teams of US troops to
fill intelligence gaps about terror organisations plotting attacks
against Washington.
Risky venture
But some defence department officials, the paper said, worry that the
expanded role carries risks.
"The authorised activities could strain relationships with friendly
governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemen - which might allow the
operations but be loath to acknowledge their co-operation - or incite
the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria," the New York
Times reported.
"Many in the military are also concerned that as US troops assume
roles far from traditional combat, they would be at risk of being
treated as spies if captured and denied the Geneva Convention
protections afforded military detainees."
The paper said the precise operations that the directive authorises
are unclear and that what the military has done to follow through on the
order is not certain.
The paper did not name several government officials who described the
impetus for the order saying the document is classified.
It said spokesmen for the White House and the Pentagon declined to
comment on the signing of the order.
Source:
Agencies
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.