

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaks during a press conference to update information about the on ongoing efforts to help people after hurricane Ian passed through the area on October 4, 2022 in Cape Coral, Florida. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
We're all in this thing together.
Or so we like to say. But Ron DeSantis' hypocrisy just punched a hole through that ideal.
With his own state largely underwater, this most political of creatures suddenly discovers a need to "put politics aside."
In 2013, when Hurricane Sandy devastated New Jersey, the then-Florida congressman piously declined to support a bill providing $9.7 billion in aid to those who had seen their homes damaged or destroyed. "I sympathize with the victims of Hurricane Sandy," he declared, but added that it would not be "fiscally responsible" to increase the debt without a decrease in spending.
Thankfully, the bill passed without his--or 67 other House Republicans'--support. Otherwise, all those people wiped out by a freak storm would have had to try paying their bills with DeSantis' sympathy.
Now, nine years later, here he comes as Florida's governor, asking Joe Biden--a president he has ridiculed tastelessly and repeatedly, no less--to provide disaster relief for his state, which was swamped last week by Hurricane Ian. Suddenly, he is singing a very different tune, telling Fox "News" that, "When people are fighting for their lives, when their whole livelihood is at stake, when they've lost everything--if you can't put politics aside for that, then you're just not going to be able to."
One suspects any New Jerseyan who stood in the rubble of his life nine years ago listening to this guy tell him to go fly a kite will have a pungent response to that sanctimonious load of bovine egesta. But DeSantis is not just a hypocrite, he's also a kind of secessionist, albeit one of convenience.
That word is used not in the sense of a legal breaking away but, rather, in the sense of an emotional and spiritual one, a pulling away from the whole, such that one can be untroubled by ruin that falls on one's putative countrymen so long as one's immediate environs are unscathed. But again, DeSantis is a secessionist of convenience: He scorned federal aid until he needed federal aid. With his own state largely underwater, this most political of creatures suddenly discovers a need to "put politics aside."
President Biden is fond of reminding us, though with an increasing edge of pleading to his voice, that, "We are the United States of America." So that what threatens any of us ought to concern all of us. To be sure, Americans remain a people of heroic generosity, willing to travel long miles, work long hours, contribute large amounts to help brothers and sisters in need.
But DeSantis' hypocrisy, his secession of convenience from the ideal of the larger us, suggests a different model of Americanism, one which, while it has yet to take broad hold, seems ominously consonant with our divided, schism-ridden politics and, more to the point, with the transactional, what's-in-it-for-me ethos popularized by his former political patron. Meaning the guy who initially stiffed California and Puerto Rico when they needed disaster relief, the guy who, according to "This Will Not Pass," a book by Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns of The New York Times, required states to "ask me nicely" for help.
Make no mistake: Florida should receive from the federal government every dime it needs to rebuild. That's what family does for family: It sacrifices. Yet one wonders whether a secessionist of convenience will remember that once the waters recede and rebuilding begins. And one doubts.
It is nice to believe we're all in this thing together. But some of us don't hold with that. They'll call you when they need you.
Till then, you're all in this thing by yourselves.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
We're all in this thing together.
Or so we like to say. But Ron DeSantis' hypocrisy just punched a hole through that ideal.
With his own state largely underwater, this most political of creatures suddenly discovers a need to "put politics aside."
In 2013, when Hurricane Sandy devastated New Jersey, the then-Florida congressman piously declined to support a bill providing $9.7 billion in aid to those who had seen their homes damaged or destroyed. "I sympathize with the victims of Hurricane Sandy," he declared, but added that it would not be "fiscally responsible" to increase the debt without a decrease in spending.
Thankfully, the bill passed without his--or 67 other House Republicans'--support. Otherwise, all those people wiped out by a freak storm would have had to try paying their bills with DeSantis' sympathy.
Now, nine years later, here he comes as Florida's governor, asking Joe Biden--a president he has ridiculed tastelessly and repeatedly, no less--to provide disaster relief for his state, which was swamped last week by Hurricane Ian. Suddenly, he is singing a very different tune, telling Fox "News" that, "When people are fighting for their lives, when their whole livelihood is at stake, when they've lost everything--if you can't put politics aside for that, then you're just not going to be able to."
One suspects any New Jerseyan who stood in the rubble of his life nine years ago listening to this guy tell him to go fly a kite will have a pungent response to that sanctimonious load of bovine egesta. But DeSantis is not just a hypocrite, he's also a kind of secessionist, albeit one of convenience.
That word is used not in the sense of a legal breaking away but, rather, in the sense of an emotional and spiritual one, a pulling away from the whole, such that one can be untroubled by ruin that falls on one's putative countrymen so long as one's immediate environs are unscathed. But again, DeSantis is a secessionist of convenience: He scorned federal aid until he needed federal aid. With his own state largely underwater, this most political of creatures suddenly discovers a need to "put politics aside."
President Biden is fond of reminding us, though with an increasing edge of pleading to his voice, that, "We are the United States of America." So that what threatens any of us ought to concern all of us. To be sure, Americans remain a people of heroic generosity, willing to travel long miles, work long hours, contribute large amounts to help brothers and sisters in need.
But DeSantis' hypocrisy, his secession of convenience from the ideal of the larger us, suggests a different model of Americanism, one which, while it has yet to take broad hold, seems ominously consonant with our divided, schism-ridden politics and, more to the point, with the transactional, what's-in-it-for-me ethos popularized by his former political patron. Meaning the guy who initially stiffed California and Puerto Rico when they needed disaster relief, the guy who, according to "This Will Not Pass," a book by Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns of The New York Times, required states to "ask me nicely" for help.
Make no mistake: Florida should receive from the federal government every dime it needs to rebuild. That's what family does for family: It sacrifices. Yet one wonders whether a secessionist of convenience will remember that once the waters recede and rebuilding begins. And one doubts.
It is nice to believe we're all in this thing together. But some of us don't hold with that. They'll call you when they need you.
Till then, you're all in this thing by yourselves.
We're all in this thing together.
Or so we like to say. But Ron DeSantis' hypocrisy just punched a hole through that ideal.
With his own state largely underwater, this most political of creatures suddenly discovers a need to "put politics aside."
In 2013, when Hurricane Sandy devastated New Jersey, the then-Florida congressman piously declined to support a bill providing $9.7 billion in aid to those who had seen their homes damaged or destroyed. "I sympathize with the victims of Hurricane Sandy," he declared, but added that it would not be "fiscally responsible" to increase the debt without a decrease in spending.
Thankfully, the bill passed without his--or 67 other House Republicans'--support. Otherwise, all those people wiped out by a freak storm would have had to try paying their bills with DeSantis' sympathy.
Now, nine years later, here he comes as Florida's governor, asking Joe Biden--a president he has ridiculed tastelessly and repeatedly, no less--to provide disaster relief for his state, which was swamped last week by Hurricane Ian. Suddenly, he is singing a very different tune, telling Fox "News" that, "When people are fighting for their lives, when their whole livelihood is at stake, when they've lost everything--if you can't put politics aside for that, then you're just not going to be able to."
One suspects any New Jerseyan who stood in the rubble of his life nine years ago listening to this guy tell him to go fly a kite will have a pungent response to that sanctimonious load of bovine egesta. But DeSantis is not just a hypocrite, he's also a kind of secessionist, albeit one of convenience.
That word is used not in the sense of a legal breaking away but, rather, in the sense of an emotional and spiritual one, a pulling away from the whole, such that one can be untroubled by ruin that falls on one's putative countrymen so long as one's immediate environs are unscathed. But again, DeSantis is a secessionist of convenience: He scorned federal aid until he needed federal aid. With his own state largely underwater, this most political of creatures suddenly discovers a need to "put politics aside."
President Biden is fond of reminding us, though with an increasing edge of pleading to his voice, that, "We are the United States of America." So that what threatens any of us ought to concern all of us. To be sure, Americans remain a people of heroic generosity, willing to travel long miles, work long hours, contribute large amounts to help brothers and sisters in need.
But DeSantis' hypocrisy, his secession of convenience from the ideal of the larger us, suggests a different model of Americanism, one which, while it has yet to take broad hold, seems ominously consonant with our divided, schism-ridden politics and, more to the point, with the transactional, what's-in-it-for-me ethos popularized by his former political patron. Meaning the guy who initially stiffed California and Puerto Rico when they needed disaster relief, the guy who, according to "This Will Not Pass," a book by Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns of The New York Times, required states to "ask me nicely" for help.
Make no mistake: Florida should receive from the federal government every dime it needs to rebuild. That's what family does for family: It sacrifices. Yet one wonders whether a secessionist of convenience will remember that once the waters recede and rebuilding begins. And one doubts.
It is nice to believe we're all in this thing together. But some of us don't hold with that. They'll call you when they need you.
Till then, you're all in this thing by yourselves.