SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Abandoned bumper cars full of rust sit in an amusement park in the ghost city of Pripyat, Ukraine, which was evacuated on the afternoon of April 27, 1986, 36 hours after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant disaster. (Photo: Francisco Goncalves/Getty Images)
Chernobyl Redux?
Russia's attack on Ukraine could release nuclear fallout across the globe.
Feb 27, 2022
Hiding in plain sight amidst the chaos of a possible war in Ukraine is the horrifying potential of another Chernobyl-scale apocalypse.
As home to Chernobyl, the world's deadliest atomic reactor disaster, Ukraine depends for more than half of its electricity on fifteen nuclear reactors. All but two were built by the Soviet Union. Until now, they've been mostly serviced and fueled by Russia.
Because it is so heavily laden with poorly stored, highly radioactive material, any military assault would be fraught with horrific potential fallout.
A dozen of those reactors are more than thirty years old, having gone on line while the Soviet Union still ruled the region. The six in the Ukrainian city of Zaporozhye are within easy striking distance of the "People's Republics" of Donetsk and Luhansk now being independently recognized by Russian president Vladimir Putin.
Like all "Peaceful Atom" reactors, Ukraine's are effectively pre-deployed weapons of a mass apocalypse. Chernobyl's April 26, 1986, meltdown and explosion spread radiation throughout the planet, and it blanketed much of Ukraine and Belarus with deadly radiation that penetrated throughout Europe and was detected in alarming quantities as far away as North America.
According to Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, published in 2007 by Alexey Yablokov and others, the disaster's radioactive fallout had by then killed more than 985,000 people worldwide, with tens of thousands more casualties likely since then.
Three other dead reactors still sit at the Chernobyl site. Because it is so heavily laden with poorly stored, highly radioactive material, any military assault would be fraught with horrific potential fallout. But even more vulnerable are Ukraine's six reactors at Zaporozhye and nine more operating at three other sites further west.
Any military action, whether targeted or accidental, could affect the control mechanisms, backup power, spent fuel pools, or emergency cooling systems and potentially yield another Chernobyl-level catastrophe with unspeakable health, ecological, and financial impacts. A cyberattack on Ukraine's power grid could have consequences on the safety and operating systems of these plants. An interruption of the water supply could affect the ability of the plants to function as well.
The region immediately surrounding Chernobyl still seethes with radiation from a disaster that occurred more than thirty-five years ago: An entire town of 50,000 people--Pripyat--remains abandoned, far too radioactive for safe human habitation.
Like that of Chernobyl, the radiation from any of Ukraine's currently operating reactors could utterly level the country politically and financially. Former Prime Minister Mikhail Gorbachev lists Chernobyl as the number one factor that fed the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Thus far, there's been no explicit mention of Ukraine's nuclear reactors in Putin's saber-rattling, but Russia's role in maintaining and fueling Ukraine's currently operating reactors hangs like a sword over the country's power supply.
Like most nuclear reactors still operating on this planet (including the ninety-three in the United States) Ukraine's are old and shaky. Even unrelated military chaos could threaten their orderly operation and lead to catastrophe.
Worse for the world as a whole, Putin has the power at the tip of his fingers--even with a relatively small, easy military strike--to carpet that entire region for a second time with enormous quantities of radiation, while sending a lethal cloud throughout the Earth's biosphere.
For the Peaceful Atom, the ultimate curse may be at the brink of coming home to roost.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Harvey Wasserman
Harvey Wasserman is an activist and author. His first book "Harvey Wasserman's History of the United States" was published in 1972. Harvey edits www.nukefree.org.
Hiding in plain sight amidst the chaos of a possible war in Ukraine is the horrifying potential of another Chernobyl-scale apocalypse.
As home to Chernobyl, the world's deadliest atomic reactor disaster, Ukraine depends for more than half of its electricity on fifteen nuclear reactors. All but two were built by the Soviet Union. Until now, they've been mostly serviced and fueled by Russia.
Because it is so heavily laden with poorly stored, highly radioactive material, any military assault would be fraught with horrific potential fallout.
A dozen of those reactors are more than thirty years old, having gone on line while the Soviet Union still ruled the region. The six in the Ukrainian city of Zaporozhye are within easy striking distance of the "People's Republics" of Donetsk and Luhansk now being independently recognized by Russian president Vladimir Putin.
Like all "Peaceful Atom" reactors, Ukraine's are effectively pre-deployed weapons of a mass apocalypse. Chernobyl's April 26, 1986, meltdown and explosion spread radiation throughout the planet, and it blanketed much of Ukraine and Belarus with deadly radiation that penetrated throughout Europe and was detected in alarming quantities as far away as North America.
According to Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, published in 2007 by Alexey Yablokov and others, the disaster's radioactive fallout had by then killed more than 985,000 people worldwide, with tens of thousands more casualties likely since then.
Three other dead reactors still sit at the Chernobyl site. Because it is so heavily laden with poorly stored, highly radioactive material, any military assault would be fraught with horrific potential fallout. But even more vulnerable are Ukraine's six reactors at Zaporozhye and nine more operating at three other sites further west.
Any military action, whether targeted or accidental, could affect the control mechanisms, backup power, spent fuel pools, or emergency cooling systems and potentially yield another Chernobyl-level catastrophe with unspeakable health, ecological, and financial impacts. A cyberattack on Ukraine's power grid could have consequences on the safety and operating systems of these plants. An interruption of the water supply could affect the ability of the plants to function as well.
The region immediately surrounding Chernobyl still seethes with radiation from a disaster that occurred more than thirty-five years ago: An entire town of 50,000 people--Pripyat--remains abandoned, far too radioactive for safe human habitation.
Like that of Chernobyl, the radiation from any of Ukraine's currently operating reactors could utterly level the country politically and financially. Former Prime Minister Mikhail Gorbachev lists Chernobyl as the number one factor that fed the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Thus far, there's been no explicit mention of Ukraine's nuclear reactors in Putin's saber-rattling, but Russia's role in maintaining and fueling Ukraine's currently operating reactors hangs like a sword over the country's power supply.
Like most nuclear reactors still operating on this planet (including the ninety-three in the United States) Ukraine's are old and shaky. Even unrelated military chaos could threaten their orderly operation and lead to catastrophe.
Worse for the world as a whole, Putin has the power at the tip of his fingers--even with a relatively small, easy military strike--to carpet that entire region for a second time with enormous quantities of radiation, while sending a lethal cloud throughout the Earth's biosphere.
For the Peaceful Atom, the ultimate curse may be at the brink of coming home to roost.
Harvey Wasserman
Harvey Wasserman is an activist and author. His first book "Harvey Wasserman's History of the United States" was published in 1972. Harvey edits www.nukefree.org.
Hiding in plain sight amidst the chaos of a possible war in Ukraine is the horrifying potential of another Chernobyl-scale apocalypse.
As home to Chernobyl, the world's deadliest atomic reactor disaster, Ukraine depends for more than half of its electricity on fifteen nuclear reactors. All but two were built by the Soviet Union. Until now, they've been mostly serviced and fueled by Russia.
Because it is so heavily laden with poorly stored, highly radioactive material, any military assault would be fraught with horrific potential fallout.
A dozen of those reactors are more than thirty years old, having gone on line while the Soviet Union still ruled the region. The six in the Ukrainian city of Zaporozhye are within easy striking distance of the "People's Republics" of Donetsk and Luhansk now being independently recognized by Russian president Vladimir Putin.
Like all "Peaceful Atom" reactors, Ukraine's are effectively pre-deployed weapons of a mass apocalypse. Chernobyl's April 26, 1986, meltdown and explosion spread radiation throughout the planet, and it blanketed much of Ukraine and Belarus with deadly radiation that penetrated throughout Europe and was detected in alarming quantities as far away as North America.
According to Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, published in 2007 by Alexey Yablokov and others, the disaster's radioactive fallout had by then killed more than 985,000 people worldwide, with tens of thousands more casualties likely since then.
Three other dead reactors still sit at the Chernobyl site. Because it is so heavily laden with poorly stored, highly radioactive material, any military assault would be fraught with horrific potential fallout. But even more vulnerable are Ukraine's six reactors at Zaporozhye and nine more operating at three other sites further west.
Any military action, whether targeted or accidental, could affect the control mechanisms, backup power, spent fuel pools, or emergency cooling systems and potentially yield another Chernobyl-level catastrophe with unspeakable health, ecological, and financial impacts. A cyberattack on Ukraine's power grid could have consequences on the safety and operating systems of these plants. An interruption of the water supply could affect the ability of the plants to function as well.
The region immediately surrounding Chernobyl still seethes with radiation from a disaster that occurred more than thirty-five years ago: An entire town of 50,000 people--Pripyat--remains abandoned, far too radioactive for safe human habitation.
Like that of Chernobyl, the radiation from any of Ukraine's currently operating reactors could utterly level the country politically and financially. Former Prime Minister Mikhail Gorbachev lists Chernobyl as the number one factor that fed the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Thus far, there's been no explicit mention of Ukraine's nuclear reactors in Putin's saber-rattling, but Russia's role in maintaining and fueling Ukraine's currently operating reactors hangs like a sword over the country's power supply.
Like most nuclear reactors still operating on this planet (including the ninety-three in the United States) Ukraine's are old and shaky. Even unrelated military chaos could threaten their orderly operation and lead to catastrophe.
Worse for the world as a whole, Putin has the power at the tip of his fingers--even with a relatively small, easy military strike--to carpet that entire region for a second time with enormous quantities of radiation, while sending a lethal cloud throughout the Earth's biosphere.
For the Peaceful Atom, the ultimate curse may be at the brink of coming home to roost.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.