A view of the Wall St street sign and the New York Stock Exchange during the coronavirus pandemic on May 25, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Noam Galai/Getty Images)
https://inequality.org/research/record-corporate-profits-stock-buybacks/
Dec 15, 2021
While Black, white, and Brown working people are struggling to recover from the pandemic, C-suite executives are using legalized self-dealing to take an ever-growing share of profits. According to the Commerce Department, the last time margins were this large was 1950. Even Morgan Stanley economists are raising the alarm about the widening mismatch between what workers get paid and the profits the C-suite takes home.
Stock buybacks exacerbate economic inequality for everyone.
And make no mistake, they are taking it home, in the form of "stock buybacks." A buyback is when executives direct their company to purchase shares of their own stock to drive up share prices. This reduces the number of shares, raising the price and putting cash in the hands of shareholders, including the company's own executives because they get paid mostly in stock. S&P 500 firms hit a record in the third quarter of this year, spending $225 billion to repurchase their own stock.
What's wrong with this picture? First, stock buybacks worsen the racial wealth gap: corporate strategies to boost share prices enrich the overwhelmingly white executives and shareholders, while leaving Black and Latinx families further behind. Black and Latinx households each own only 1 percent of the total stock market value--figures that have not budged for the past 30 years--while white families hold 90 percent of the stock market value.
Second, stock buybacks exacerbate economic inequality for everyone. The wealthiest 10 percent of households control 88 percent of the stock market, and the top 1 percent alone own 53 percent of the market.
Third, stock buybacks divert resources from investing in companies and jobs. Share buybacks are associated with layoffs and depressed wages. After two Boeing Max 737 planes crashed within five months of each other in 2019, it was revealed that Boeing had recently authorized a massive $20 billion in stock buybacks at the expense of testing and safety investments. Companies are even borrowing money to pay for their buybacks. Then they're stuck paying that debt instead of investing in workers, new products, or new services.
What can be done about this problem? The House recently passed a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks in its version of the Build Back Better Act. This will help curb excessive shareholder payouts to wealthy executives and shareholders to fund infrastructure like child care. Even a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks would generate $12.5 billion annually.
Ultimately, we need to return to the pre-1980s rules that considered stock buybacks on the open market an illegal market manipulation, as Senator Tammy Baldwin's Reward Work Act proposes. But a tax on stock buybacks is at least a down payment. If we're to have any hope of fixing what's broken in corporate America, Congress needs to keep this provision in the final Build Back Better Act.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 In These Times
Porter Mcconnell
Porter McConnell is the campaign manager for Take on Wall Street and a co-author -- of Wall Street Makes Bank on Trump: 2017 in Review.
Mandla Deskins
Mandla Deskins is the Advocacy Coordinator for Take on Wall Street.
While Black, white, and Brown working people are struggling to recover from the pandemic, C-suite executives are using legalized self-dealing to take an ever-growing share of profits. According to the Commerce Department, the last time margins were this large was 1950. Even Morgan Stanley economists are raising the alarm about the widening mismatch between what workers get paid and the profits the C-suite takes home.
Stock buybacks exacerbate economic inequality for everyone.
And make no mistake, they are taking it home, in the form of "stock buybacks." A buyback is when executives direct their company to purchase shares of their own stock to drive up share prices. This reduces the number of shares, raising the price and putting cash in the hands of shareholders, including the company's own executives because they get paid mostly in stock. S&P 500 firms hit a record in the third quarter of this year, spending $225 billion to repurchase their own stock.
What's wrong with this picture? First, stock buybacks worsen the racial wealth gap: corporate strategies to boost share prices enrich the overwhelmingly white executives and shareholders, while leaving Black and Latinx families further behind. Black and Latinx households each own only 1 percent of the total stock market value--figures that have not budged for the past 30 years--while white families hold 90 percent of the stock market value.
Second, stock buybacks exacerbate economic inequality for everyone. The wealthiest 10 percent of households control 88 percent of the stock market, and the top 1 percent alone own 53 percent of the market.
Third, stock buybacks divert resources from investing in companies and jobs. Share buybacks are associated with layoffs and depressed wages. After two Boeing Max 737 planes crashed within five months of each other in 2019, it was revealed that Boeing had recently authorized a massive $20 billion in stock buybacks at the expense of testing and safety investments. Companies are even borrowing money to pay for their buybacks. Then they're stuck paying that debt instead of investing in workers, new products, or new services.
What can be done about this problem? The House recently passed a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks in its version of the Build Back Better Act. This will help curb excessive shareholder payouts to wealthy executives and shareholders to fund infrastructure like child care. Even a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks would generate $12.5 billion annually.
Ultimately, we need to return to the pre-1980s rules that considered stock buybacks on the open market an illegal market manipulation, as Senator Tammy Baldwin's Reward Work Act proposes. But a tax on stock buybacks is at least a down payment. If we're to have any hope of fixing what's broken in corporate America, Congress needs to keep this provision in the final Build Back Better Act.
Porter Mcconnell
Porter McConnell is the campaign manager for Take on Wall Street and a co-author -- of Wall Street Makes Bank on Trump: 2017 in Review.
Mandla Deskins
Mandla Deskins is the Advocacy Coordinator for Take on Wall Street.
While Black, white, and Brown working people are struggling to recover from the pandemic, C-suite executives are using legalized self-dealing to take an ever-growing share of profits. According to the Commerce Department, the last time margins were this large was 1950. Even Morgan Stanley economists are raising the alarm about the widening mismatch between what workers get paid and the profits the C-suite takes home.
Stock buybacks exacerbate economic inequality for everyone.
And make no mistake, they are taking it home, in the form of "stock buybacks." A buyback is when executives direct their company to purchase shares of their own stock to drive up share prices. This reduces the number of shares, raising the price and putting cash in the hands of shareholders, including the company's own executives because they get paid mostly in stock. S&P 500 firms hit a record in the third quarter of this year, spending $225 billion to repurchase their own stock.
What's wrong with this picture? First, stock buybacks worsen the racial wealth gap: corporate strategies to boost share prices enrich the overwhelmingly white executives and shareholders, while leaving Black and Latinx families further behind. Black and Latinx households each own only 1 percent of the total stock market value--figures that have not budged for the past 30 years--while white families hold 90 percent of the stock market value.
Second, stock buybacks exacerbate economic inequality for everyone. The wealthiest 10 percent of households control 88 percent of the stock market, and the top 1 percent alone own 53 percent of the market.
Third, stock buybacks divert resources from investing in companies and jobs. Share buybacks are associated with layoffs and depressed wages. After two Boeing Max 737 planes crashed within five months of each other in 2019, it was revealed that Boeing had recently authorized a massive $20 billion in stock buybacks at the expense of testing and safety investments. Companies are even borrowing money to pay for their buybacks. Then they're stuck paying that debt instead of investing in workers, new products, or new services.
What can be done about this problem? The House recently passed a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks in its version of the Build Back Better Act. This will help curb excessive shareholder payouts to wealthy executives and shareholders to fund infrastructure like child care. Even a 1 percent tax on stock buybacks would generate $12.5 billion annually.
Ultimately, we need to return to the pre-1980s rules that considered stock buybacks on the open market an illegal market manipulation, as Senator Tammy Baldwin's Reward Work Act proposes. But a tax on stock buybacks is at least a down payment. If we're to have any hope of fixing what's broken in corporate America, Congress needs to keep this provision in the final Build Back Better Act.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.