Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

As a pediatrician, I find the entire concept of qualified immunity absurd.(Photo: Screengrab/WBFO)

As a pediatrician, I find the entire concept of qualified immunity absurd.(Photo: Screengrab/WBFO)

I Don’t Have Qualified Immunity; Why Should Police?

Pediatrician says professionals should be held accountable.

Jeanette Callahan

In July, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed their version of a police reform bill that has languished in a conference committee ever since, reportedly because of a deadlock over the issue of qualified immunity.

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that shields police officers from civil liability even when they violate someone’s constitutional rights—unless the violation was already “clearly established.” In other words, unless another officer has already been held liable for a nearly identical violation in the past, a victim of police misconduct who sues will likely have their case thrown out in civil court.

As a pediatrician, I find the entire concept of qualified immunity absurd. Like police officers, I have a great deal of power over the health and wellbeing of those in my charge. Like police officers, I have access to a set of tools—surgical instruments, drugs, machinery—that are supposed to save lives but that, in the wrong hands, can be deadly. And like police officers, I am bound by an oath—not “to serve and protect” but similarly to “do no harm” to my patients.

Impunity means that even at the height of nationwide scrutiny and outrage, police officers in Kenosha still felt entitled to shoot Jacob Blake, an unarmed black man, seven times in the back while his children watched, paralyzing him from the waist down.

But there is a key difference between police officers and doctors—only one of us can expect to face significant professional or legal consequences for failing to live up to our oaths. If I give penicillin to a child whom I know to be allergic, and that child later dies, I might lose my license and be sued for malpractice—or worse. All doctors accept this responsibility. It’s why we carry personal liability insurance as a requirement of our jobs. Unlike police officers, we are not indemnified by our employers—we must cover the cost of our mistakes.

As a doctor, I don’t need the law to tell me that tackling a mentally ill patient to the ground and tasing her in the back is wrong. But what if medical professionals could rely on the same kind of excessive legal protection? What if we had qualified immunity?

Imagine that you’re a patient, and you’ve just woken up from surgery to find that your doctor has amputated the wrong leg. As unlikely as it might seem, it’s happened before. In 1996, a Florida surgeon realized, with less than optimal timing, that he had failed to confirm the site of his procedure. He was supposed to amputate the patient’s right leg below the knee, but it was too late—he was already severing the left. The patient, understandably upset, sued, and received a $900,000 settlement.

But what if a judge stopped the patient’s lawsuit in its tracks? What if the judge ruled that the case was so unusual, so unprecedented, that the doctor could not have possibly known that he should confirm the site of amputation? After all, the details were a little murky—a blackboard announcing surgeries for that day also listed the wrong leg, and although the patient’s consent form had the correct limb, until this incident doctors were not required to check these forms. The doctor might well have been in the wrong, but nobody had ever been punished for this exact mistake before, so it wasn’t “clearly established.” Case dismissed—before it even starts.

I shudder to think what would happen to my profession, to the trust between patients and caregivers, if people couldn’t seek justice in our courts for clear cases of malpractice. Doctors are cautious by nature—we don’t want to hurt our patients—but immunity breeds impunity, and a patient’s right to sue is not only an innate part of their humanity, but also a safeguard against complacency and carelessness.

Impunity means that even at the height of nationwide scrutiny and outrage, police officers in Kenosha still felt entitled to shoot Jacob Blake, an unarmed black man, seven times in the back while his children watched, paralyzing him from the waist down. If those officers get qualified immunity, Blake will be left—like other victims who were denied justice—to pay for his own medical costs for the rest of his life.

Police unions often tout the professionalism of their members. As fellow professionals committed to community wellbeing, they must see that erecting barriers to accountability, allowing someone to escape the consequences of their actions, is unacceptable. Qualified immunity must go.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jeanette Callahan

Jeanette Callahan is a pediatrician who works for Cambridge Health Alliance and the Justice Resource Institute’s DYS juvenile detention center in Middleton.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Bush, Pressley, and Omar Sleep Outside Capitol to Demand Extension of Eviction Moratorium

Rep. Cori Bush, who was formerly unhoused, slammed her Democratic colleagues who "chose to go on vacation early today rather than staying to vote to keep people in their homes."

Jake Johnson ·


As Progressives Call for End to Blockade, Biden Announces More Sanctions Against Cuba

The move comes after Democratic leadership in the House blocked an amendment to roll back limits on how much money people in the United States can send to family on the island nation.

Jessica Corbett ·


Progressives Issue Dire Warning as House Bill to Extend Eviction Moratorium Dies

"If Congress does not act now, the fallout of the eviction crisis will undoubtedly set us backwards as the Covid-19 pandemic continues to ravish our communities, needlessly contributing to more death and destruction."

Brett Wilkins ·


Citing Donziger Case, Dems Raise Alarm About Use of Private Prosecutors in Federal Court

Private prosecutions of criminal contempt charges, said a pair of senators, "are highly unusual and can raise concerning questions of fundamental fairness in our criminal justice system."

Jessica Corbett ·


'About Damn Time': DOJ Says Treasury Department Must Give Trump's Tax Returns to Congress

"This case is now bigger even than Donald Trump's crimes. Neither the courts, nor the machinery of our government, exist to bodyguard a corrupt private citizen from transparency."

Jake Johnson ·