Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

"It is clear that the stimulus payment and UI expansions in March dramatically reduced poverty during the initial months of the pandemic," writes Zipperer. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

"It is clear that the stimulus payment and UI expansions in March dramatically reduced poverty during the initial months of the pandemic," writes Zipperer. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Over 13 Million More People Would Be in Poverty Without Unemployment Insurance and Stimulus Payments

Senate Republicans are blocking legislation proven to reduce poverty.

It is often underappreciated how effective public safety net spending and social insurance programs are in reducing poverty. Even in normal years, tens of millions of people are kept out of poverty only because of these programs. As the COVID-19 pandemic hit earlier this year, the importance of public spending in averting poverty became even more evident.

In its annual report on household income and poverty released Tuesday, the Census Bureau estimated that Social Security kept 26.5 million people out of poverty in 2019, and refundable tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit reduced the number of people in poverty by 7.5 million. Unemployment insurance (UI) kept about 472,000 people from being in poverty (see Figure A) in 2019. The relatively small poverty reduction is due to the fact that few people received UI in 2019, both because of relatively low unemployment rates and because many low-wage workers are generally ineligible for UI benefits due to restrictive earnings eligibility requirements.

In March of this year, as job loss began to accelerate, Congress temporarily strengthened the UI system as part of the CARES Act. Notably, it extended eligibility to low-wage, part-time, and self-employed workers, and it added an extra weekly UI benefit of $600. The law also provided a one-time Economic Impact Payment (EIP) of $1,200 per adult and $500 per child.

New research by Jeehoon Han, Bruce Meyer, and James Sullivan estimates that EIP and UI payments between April and June substantially reduced the number of people in poverty, even when millions of workers were suddenly laid off or furloughed. Applying those results to the recently released Census data for 2019 shows that the number of people in poverty fell by 4.7 million between the end of 2019 and June 2020, from 34.0 million to 29.3 million.

The fall in poverty is entirely due to the EIP and UI payments. The EIP alone reduced poverty by 8.2 million workers and the UI programs had a slightly smaller impact, lowering poverty by 7.2 million workers. Had both of those programs not been in place, the effects of the economic shock caused by the pandemic would have increased poverty by 13.2 million people to about 42.5 million people overall living in poverty. These are temporary poverty reductions effective the month of June 2020 because of the one-time nature of the $1,200 check and the July expiration of the supplementary $600 weekly UI benefit.

There is of course some uncertainty about this calculation, as it assumes the 2019 poverty rate is a decent approximation to the unknown poverty rate that we would have experienced in 2020 in the absence of the pandemic. We may overstate the total reduction in poverty due to UI and EIP if an improving labor market throughout 2020 would have continued to reduce poverty below 2019 levels. However, we may be underestimating the poverty reduction, as the Census Bureau has provided evidence that their headline estimates for 2019 undercount the number of people in poverty by as many as 1.9 million due to survey nonresponse issues.

In any case, it is clear that the stimulus payment and UI expansions in March dramatically reduced poverty during the initial months of the pandemic. Unfortunately, the $600 supplementary UI payment expired in July. Senate Republicans blocking its renewal have increased poverty and hardship for millions of families in the middle of a pandemic that has caused widespread job loss and health devastation.

© 2021 Economic Policy Institute

Ben Zipperer

Ben Zipperer is an economist at the Economic Policy Institute. His areas of expertise include the minimum wage, inequality, and low-wage labor markets. He has published research in the Industrial and Labor Relations Review and has been quoted in outlets such as the New York TimesThe Washington Post, Bloomberg, and the BBC.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'When You Don't Change People's Lives, People Get Upset,' Says AOC

To reverse slump in Democratic approval ratings, the congresswoman said Biden should start by cancelling student loan debt.

Julia Conley ·

Sioux Tribe Withdraws as Cooperating Agency Over Dakota Access Pipeline Threat

"The prospect of an oil spill during such low water is truly scary," says the tribe's Water Resources Department administrator.

Jessica Corbett ·

New Report Shows How US Transportation System 'Fuels Inequality'

Favoring cars over public transit has "consequences for racial and economic justice, the environment, and more," the Institute for Policy Studies warns.

Brett Wilkins ·

Gas Stoves Even Worse for Climate, Health Than Previously Thought

New study shows methane leaks from U.S. gas-burning stoves have a climate impact comparable to emissions from about 500,000 cars.

Jessica Corbett ·

Exiting Breyer Quotes Lincoln: 'We Are Now Engaged in a Great Civil War'

The Supreme Court justice appeared to be "pointedly talking about threats facing the country," said one observer.

Julia Conley ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo