Supporters cheer as Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks to the crowd at a campaign rally on July 26, 2019 in Santa Monica, California. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Are Establishment Democrats Running Out of Ways to Sabotage Bernie Sanders?
The moderates of the party can't stand what Bernie is and what he stands for, but they apparently can't find a way to beat him.
Bernie Sanders is surging in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary polls, and, as CNN analyst Harry Enten wrote Sunday, "It's becoming more apparent" that the Vermont senator and former Vice President Joe Biden "are the candidates to beat." Sanders, according to Enten, has an extra advantage: "Biden's fundraising is not anywhere near as strong as Sanders'." As a recent Politico story observed, Sanders' campaign is "being taken seriously" among Democratic party insiders.
Sanders' ascension is scaring acolytes of former President Barack Obama, but according to a new story from the Daily Beast, they can't figure out a way to stop him.
"As Sanders gained new flashes of traction in recent weeks," the Daily Beast reports, "the former president's lack of official guidance to halt his momentum, and the scattering of his inner circle to rival campaigns, have hampered any meaningful NeverBernie movement."
In fact, writer Hanna Trudo continues, "the most striking aspect of Obamaworld's response to Sanders ... is the lack of a cohesive one." It's possible they're just hoping that Sanders fades away on his own.
That seems to be Neera Tanden's strategy. The president of the Center for American Progress and former policy director for the Obama campaign told the Daily Beast, "Money is important but doesn't always translate to votes."
Other former Obama aides, many of whom declined to give their names, pointed to the emergence of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., as a formidable progressive opponent and a reason the Sanders campaign could fizzle out. They also mentioned Biden's strong support among black voters, a demographic with which Sanders has previously struggled.
One former top Obama adviser, who chose to remain anonymous, believes that while Sanders may stay flush with cash, "he's going to be a zombie candidate. You can go anywhere and still be dead," emphasizing that Sanders isn't enough of a threat to merit a large opposition strategy.
Another former Obama aide believes Sanders' supporters are insufficiently supportive of Obama's legacy: "If you read between the lines of what the Sanders folks are saying about the rationale of his candidacy, it is based on their belief that Barack Obama was not progressive," adding, "there is a fundamental flaw in the Sanders candidacy relative to the Obama coalition and it's because they've continually undermined President Obama."
Not everyone in Obama's orbit shares the same view of Sanders; some are even taking his candidacy seriously. "I believe people should take him very seriously," Dan Pfeiffer, a former Obama adviser, told Politico in December. "He has a very good shot of winning Iowa, a very good shot of winning New Hampshire, and other than Joe Biden, the best shot of winning Nevada."
Obama himself has yet to endorse a candidate in the primary, but as the Daily Beast points out, he hasn't been very complimentary of the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party. He told donors in November not to pay too much attention to "certain left-leaning Twitter feeds or the activist wing of our party."
With Sanders in the top three in multiple state and national polls, and with his coalition becoming increasingly diverse, the mainstream wing of the Democratic Party may have a more formidable challenge on its left than it thinks.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Bernie Sanders is surging in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary polls, and, as CNN analyst Harry Enten wrote Sunday, "It's becoming more apparent" that the Vermont senator and former Vice President Joe Biden "are the candidates to beat." Sanders, according to Enten, has an extra advantage: "Biden's fundraising is not anywhere near as strong as Sanders'." As a recent Politico story observed, Sanders' campaign is "being taken seriously" among Democratic party insiders.
Sanders' ascension is scaring acolytes of former President Barack Obama, but according to a new story from the Daily Beast, they can't figure out a way to stop him.
"As Sanders gained new flashes of traction in recent weeks," the Daily Beast reports, "the former president's lack of official guidance to halt his momentum, and the scattering of his inner circle to rival campaigns, have hampered any meaningful NeverBernie movement."
In fact, writer Hanna Trudo continues, "the most striking aspect of Obamaworld's response to Sanders ... is the lack of a cohesive one." It's possible they're just hoping that Sanders fades away on his own.
That seems to be Neera Tanden's strategy. The president of the Center for American Progress and former policy director for the Obama campaign told the Daily Beast, "Money is important but doesn't always translate to votes."
Other former Obama aides, many of whom declined to give their names, pointed to the emergence of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., as a formidable progressive opponent and a reason the Sanders campaign could fizzle out. They also mentioned Biden's strong support among black voters, a demographic with which Sanders has previously struggled.
One former top Obama adviser, who chose to remain anonymous, believes that while Sanders may stay flush with cash, "he's going to be a zombie candidate. You can go anywhere and still be dead," emphasizing that Sanders isn't enough of a threat to merit a large opposition strategy.
Another former Obama aide believes Sanders' supporters are insufficiently supportive of Obama's legacy: "If you read between the lines of what the Sanders folks are saying about the rationale of his candidacy, it is based on their belief that Barack Obama was not progressive," adding, "there is a fundamental flaw in the Sanders candidacy relative to the Obama coalition and it's because they've continually undermined President Obama."
Not everyone in Obama's orbit shares the same view of Sanders; some are even taking his candidacy seriously. "I believe people should take him very seriously," Dan Pfeiffer, a former Obama adviser, told Politico in December. "He has a very good shot of winning Iowa, a very good shot of winning New Hampshire, and other than Joe Biden, the best shot of winning Nevada."
Obama himself has yet to endorse a candidate in the primary, but as the Daily Beast points out, he hasn't been very complimentary of the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party. He told donors in November not to pay too much attention to "certain left-leaning Twitter feeds or the activist wing of our party."
With Sanders in the top three in multiple state and national polls, and with his coalition becoming increasingly diverse, the mainstream wing of the Democratic Party may have a more formidable challenge on its left than it thinks.
Bernie Sanders is surging in the 2020 Democratic presidential primary polls, and, as CNN analyst Harry Enten wrote Sunday, "It's becoming more apparent" that the Vermont senator and former Vice President Joe Biden "are the candidates to beat." Sanders, according to Enten, has an extra advantage: "Biden's fundraising is not anywhere near as strong as Sanders'." As a recent Politico story observed, Sanders' campaign is "being taken seriously" among Democratic party insiders.
Sanders' ascension is scaring acolytes of former President Barack Obama, but according to a new story from the Daily Beast, they can't figure out a way to stop him.
"As Sanders gained new flashes of traction in recent weeks," the Daily Beast reports, "the former president's lack of official guidance to halt his momentum, and the scattering of his inner circle to rival campaigns, have hampered any meaningful NeverBernie movement."
In fact, writer Hanna Trudo continues, "the most striking aspect of Obamaworld's response to Sanders ... is the lack of a cohesive one." It's possible they're just hoping that Sanders fades away on his own.
That seems to be Neera Tanden's strategy. The president of the Center for American Progress and former policy director for the Obama campaign told the Daily Beast, "Money is important but doesn't always translate to votes."
Other former Obama aides, many of whom declined to give their names, pointed to the emergence of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., as a formidable progressive opponent and a reason the Sanders campaign could fizzle out. They also mentioned Biden's strong support among black voters, a demographic with which Sanders has previously struggled.
One former top Obama adviser, who chose to remain anonymous, believes that while Sanders may stay flush with cash, "he's going to be a zombie candidate. You can go anywhere and still be dead," emphasizing that Sanders isn't enough of a threat to merit a large opposition strategy.
Another former Obama aide believes Sanders' supporters are insufficiently supportive of Obama's legacy: "If you read between the lines of what the Sanders folks are saying about the rationale of his candidacy, it is based on their belief that Barack Obama was not progressive," adding, "there is a fundamental flaw in the Sanders candidacy relative to the Obama coalition and it's because they've continually undermined President Obama."
Not everyone in Obama's orbit shares the same view of Sanders; some are even taking his candidacy seriously. "I believe people should take him very seriously," Dan Pfeiffer, a former Obama adviser, told Politico in December. "He has a very good shot of winning Iowa, a very good shot of winning New Hampshire, and other than Joe Biden, the best shot of winning Nevada."
Obama himself has yet to endorse a candidate in the primary, but as the Daily Beast points out, he hasn't been very complimentary of the more progressive wing of the Democratic Party. He told donors in November not to pay too much attention to "certain left-leaning Twitter feeds or the activist wing of our party."
With Sanders in the top three in multiple state and national polls, and with his coalition becoming increasingly diverse, the mainstream wing of the Democratic Party may have a more formidable challenge on its left than it thinks.