Mar 27, 2019
The Trump administration's opposition to legal abortion just became more aggressive. Reuters reported on Tuesday that the U.S. will expand its "global gag rule," which prevents the aid groups it funds from performing abortions and even advertising the abortion services of other organizations. "We will refuse to provide assistance to foreign NGOs that give financial support to other foreign groups in the global abortion industry," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said. Pompeo also said he would "enforce federal law forbidding the use of U.S. funding, including foreign assistance, to lobby for or against abortion," Reuters added.
\u201c.@SecPompeo announces expansion to Mexico City policy: US now won't assist NGOs that fund third parties that provide abortions. And Pompeo announces US will reduce contributions to @OAS_official, prohibit US funds to OAS-related groups that advocate for or against abortion\u201d— Nick Schifrin (@Nick Schifrin) 1553607350
Republicans will likely celebrate the news. They've supported the global gag rule and its domestic analogues for decades. Sometimes known as the Mexico City policy, the global gag rule has haunted U.S. foreign policy for over 30 years. In fact, it was one of the contemporary anti-abortion movement's earliest victories. Ronald Reagan created the rule in 1984; since then, it's been rescinded by Democratic presidents and reinstated by Republican presidents, a back-and-forth game that leaves nongovernmental organizations in the lurch.
The policy is meant to reduce abortions, but there's evidence that it does the opposite. Two studies found that the gag rule actually coincided with an increase in abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. That may be because the same family-planning clinics that would perform abortions, or tell patients where they could receive abortions, provide contraception, too.
Pompeo has also expressed open hostility to Islam, framed the global war on terror as spiritual warfare, and urged conversion to Christianity as a means of winning that spiritual battle.
Considered against this evidence, that gag rule looks purely like a punitive measure. But there isn't much reason to think that Pompeo prioritizes evidence-based development policy, or that the notion of punishing abortion-seeking women troubles him at all. He is a deeply conservative Christian who has opposed legal abortion for decades. As a Republican representative from Kansas, he voted for bills that would have granted personhood status to fetuses, defunded Planned Parenthood, and eliminated the Title X family-planning program. His abortion position stems from his religious beliefs, which he has frequently cited in the course of carrying out his duties as secretary of State and, previously, as the director of the CIA. Sources toldForeign Policy in 2017 that Pompeo avoided attending diversity events at the CIA, and seemed hostile to affirmative action policies; the cancellation of a scheduled talk by Judy and Dennis Shepard, the parents of Matthew Shepard, raised further questions about the way he has melded his professional responsibilities with his personal beliefs. Pompeo has also expressed open hostility to Islam, framed the global war on terror as spiritual warfare, and urged conversion to Christianity as a means of winning that spiritual battle.
Pompeo did not adopt subtler tactics when he became the secretary of State. He recently told the Christian Broadcasting Network that he believed it is "possible" that God appointed Trump to save Israel from Iran. He also continued a practice begun by his predecessor, Rex Tillerson, which removed reproductive rights from the department's annual human rights reports. Tuesday's announcement was probably inevitable--and so is the human suffering that will follow it.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 New York Magazine
Sarah Jones
Sarah Jones is a staff writer for The New Republic. Follow her on Twitter: @onesarahjones
The Trump administration's opposition to legal abortion just became more aggressive. Reuters reported on Tuesday that the U.S. will expand its "global gag rule," which prevents the aid groups it funds from performing abortions and even advertising the abortion services of other organizations. "We will refuse to provide assistance to foreign NGOs that give financial support to other foreign groups in the global abortion industry," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said. Pompeo also said he would "enforce federal law forbidding the use of U.S. funding, including foreign assistance, to lobby for or against abortion," Reuters added.
\u201c.@SecPompeo announces expansion to Mexico City policy: US now won't assist NGOs that fund third parties that provide abortions. And Pompeo announces US will reduce contributions to @OAS_official, prohibit US funds to OAS-related groups that advocate for or against abortion\u201d— Nick Schifrin (@Nick Schifrin) 1553607350
Republicans will likely celebrate the news. They've supported the global gag rule and its domestic analogues for decades. Sometimes known as the Mexico City policy, the global gag rule has haunted U.S. foreign policy for over 30 years. In fact, it was one of the contemporary anti-abortion movement's earliest victories. Ronald Reagan created the rule in 1984; since then, it's been rescinded by Democratic presidents and reinstated by Republican presidents, a back-and-forth game that leaves nongovernmental organizations in the lurch.
The policy is meant to reduce abortions, but there's evidence that it does the opposite. Two studies found that the gag rule actually coincided with an increase in abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. That may be because the same family-planning clinics that would perform abortions, or tell patients where they could receive abortions, provide contraception, too.
Pompeo has also expressed open hostility to Islam, framed the global war on terror as spiritual warfare, and urged conversion to Christianity as a means of winning that spiritual battle.
Considered against this evidence, that gag rule looks purely like a punitive measure. But there isn't much reason to think that Pompeo prioritizes evidence-based development policy, or that the notion of punishing abortion-seeking women troubles him at all. He is a deeply conservative Christian who has opposed legal abortion for decades. As a Republican representative from Kansas, he voted for bills that would have granted personhood status to fetuses, defunded Planned Parenthood, and eliminated the Title X family-planning program. His abortion position stems from his religious beliefs, which he has frequently cited in the course of carrying out his duties as secretary of State and, previously, as the director of the CIA. Sources toldForeign Policy in 2017 that Pompeo avoided attending diversity events at the CIA, and seemed hostile to affirmative action policies; the cancellation of a scheduled talk by Judy and Dennis Shepard, the parents of Matthew Shepard, raised further questions about the way he has melded his professional responsibilities with his personal beliefs. Pompeo has also expressed open hostility to Islam, framed the global war on terror as spiritual warfare, and urged conversion to Christianity as a means of winning that spiritual battle.
Pompeo did not adopt subtler tactics when he became the secretary of State. He recently told the Christian Broadcasting Network that he believed it is "possible" that God appointed Trump to save Israel from Iran. He also continued a practice begun by his predecessor, Rex Tillerson, which removed reproductive rights from the department's annual human rights reports. Tuesday's announcement was probably inevitable--and so is the human suffering that will follow it.
Sarah Jones
Sarah Jones is a staff writer for The New Republic. Follow her on Twitter: @onesarahjones
The Trump administration's opposition to legal abortion just became more aggressive. Reuters reported on Tuesday that the U.S. will expand its "global gag rule," which prevents the aid groups it funds from performing abortions and even advertising the abortion services of other organizations. "We will refuse to provide assistance to foreign NGOs that give financial support to other foreign groups in the global abortion industry," Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said. Pompeo also said he would "enforce federal law forbidding the use of U.S. funding, including foreign assistance, to lobby for or against abortion," Reuters added.
\u201c.@SecPompeo announces expansion to Mexico City policy: US now won't assist NGOs that fund third parties that provide abortions. And Pompeo announces US will reduce contributions to @OAS_official, prohibit US funds to OAS-related groups that advocate for or against abortion\u201d— Nick Schifrin (@Nick Schifrin) 1553607350
Republicans will likely celebrate the news. They've supported the global gag rule and its domestic analogues for decades. Sometimes known as the Mexico City policy, the global gag rule has haunted U.S. foreign policy for over 30 years. In fact, it was one of the contemporary anti-abortion movement's earliest victories. Ronald Reagan created the rule in 1984; since then, it's been rescinded by Democratic presidents and reinstated by Republican presidents, a back-and-forth game that leaves nongovernmental organizations in the lurch.
The policy is meant to reduce abortions, but there's evidence that it does the opposite. Two studies found that the gag rule actually coincided with an increase in abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America. That may be because the same family-planning clinics that would perform abortions, or tell patients where they could receive abortions, provide contraception, too.
Pompeo has also expressed open hostility to Islam, framed the global war on terror as spiritual warfare, and urged conversion to Christianity as a means of winning that spiritual battle.
Considered against this evidence, that gag rule looks purely like a punitive measure. But there isn't much reason to think that Pompeo prioritizes evidence-based development policy, or that the notion of punishing abortion-seeking women troubles him at all. He is a deeply conservative Christian who has opposed legal abortion for decades. As a Republican representative from Kansas, he voted for bills that would have granted personhood status to fetuses, defunded Planned Parenthood, and eliminated the Title X family-planning program. His abortion position stems from his religious beliefs, which he has frequently cited in the course of carrying out his duties as secretary of State and, previously, as the director of the CIA. Sources toldForeign Policy in 2017 that Pompeo avoided attending diversity events at the CIA, and seemed hostile to affirmative action policies; the cancellation of a scheduled talk by Judy and Dennis Shepard, the parents of Matthew Shepard, raised further questions about the way he has melded his professional responsibilities with his personal beliefs. Pompeo has also expressed open hostility to Islam, framed the global war on terror as spiritual warfare, and urged conversion to Christianity as a means of winning that spiritual battle.
Pompeo did not adopt subtler tactics when he became the secretary of State. He recently told the Christian Broadcasting Network that he believed it is "possible" that God appointed Trump to save Israel from Iran. He also continued a practice begun by his predecessor, Rex Tillerson, which removed reproductive rights from the department's annual human rights reports. Tuesday's announcement was probably inevitable--and so is the human suffering that will follow it.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.