But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. (Photo: Jose Luis Magura/AP)
Jan 28, 2019
President Trump may be the world's most renowned fan of building walls, but there's at least one wall he loathes: the wall of separation between church and state. From the Muslim ban to his so-called "religious freedom" executive order, Trump and his theocratic supporters have pushed laws and policies aimed at demolishing the First Amendment's protections against government promotion of religion and favoritism of particular faiths. And now, he's targeting church-state separation in our public schools.
After Fox News aired a segment on "[b]ringing the Bible back to the classroom" on Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, "Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!"
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools.
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination. More often than not, public school Bible classes resemble Sunday school lessons and violate students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
For example, an ACLU investigation last year of elective Bible classes in Kentucky public schools uncovered course materials instructing students to "[d]o your best to build close relationships with other Christians, so that you may help one another through tough times," and asking them, "What are some promises in the Bible that God gives everyone who believes in him?" In the same school district, students watched devotional and proselytizing films, such as "God's Not Dead 2" and "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" as part of the curriculum. And in other school districts, class assignments included memorizing and reciting Bible verses.
Rigorous academic study it's not.
As our Kentucky investigation made clear, courses focusing on one faith or religious text create conditions ripe for proselytizing and official promotion of religious beliefs. No matter what President Trump says, students are the ones who pay the price. That's why many courts have ruled that such classes, as implemented, violate the Constitution.
We've successfully challenged Bible courses in court before. We won't hesitate to do it again if public schools cross the line.
© 2023 ACLU
Heather Weaver
Heather L. Weaver is a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief.
President Trump may be the world's most renowned fan of building walls, but there's at least one wall he loathes: the wall of separation between church and state. From the Muslim ban to his so-called "religious freedom" executive order, Trump and his theocratic supporters have pushed laws and policies aimed at demolishing the First Amendment's protections against government promotion of religion and favoritism of particular faiths. And now, he's targeting church-state separation in our public schools.
After Fox News aired a segment on "[b]ringing the Bible back to the classroom" on Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, "Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!"
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools.
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination. More often than not, public school Bible classes resemble Sunday school lessons and violate students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
For example, an ACLU investigation last year of elective Bible classes in Kentucky public schools uncovered course materials instructing students to "[d]o your best to build close relationships with other Christians, so that you may help one another through tough times," and asking them, "What are some promises in the Bible that God gives everyone who believes in him?" In the same school district, students watched devotional and proselytizing films, such as "God's Not Dead 2" and "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" as part of the curriculum. And in other school districts, class assignments included memorizing and reciting Bible verses.
Rigorous academic study it's not.
As our Kentucky investigation made clear, courses focusing on one faith or religious text create conditions ripe for proselytizing and official promotion of religious beliefs. No matter what President Trump says, students are the ones who pay the price. That's why many courts have ruled that such classes, as implemented, violate the Constitution.
We've successfully challenged Bible courses in court before. We won't hesitate to do it again if public schools cross the line.
Heather Weaver
Heather L. Weaver is a senior staff attorney with the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief.
President Trump may be the world's most renowned fan of building walls, but there's at least one wall he loathes: the wall of separation between church and state. From the Muslim ban to his so-called "religious freedom" executive order, Trump and his theocratic supporters have pushed laws and policies aimed at demolishing the First Amendment's protections against government promotion of religion and favoritism of particular faiths. And now, he's targeting church-state separation in our public schools.
After Fox News aired a segment on "[b]ringing the Bible back to the classroom" on Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, "Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!"
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools.
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination. More often than not, public school Bible classes resemble Sunday school lessons and violate students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
For example, an ACLU investigation last year of elective Bible classes in Kentucky public schools uncovered course materials instructing students to "[d]o your best to build close relationships with other Christians, so that you may help one another through tough times," and asking them, "What are some promises in the Bible that God gives everyone who believes in him?" In the same school district, students watched devotional and proselytizing films, such as "God's Not Dead 2" and "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" as part of the curriculum. And in other school districts, class assignments included memorizing and reciting Bible verses.
Rigorous academic study it's not.
As our Kentucky investigation made clear, courses focusing on one faith or religious text create conditions ripe for proselytizing and official promotion of religious beliefs. No matter what President Trump says, students are the ones who pay the price. That's why many courts have ruled that such classes, as implemented, violate the Constitution.
We've successfully challenged Bible courses in court before. We won't hesitate to do it again if public schools cross the line.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.