

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. (Photo: Jose Luis Magura/AP)
President Trump may be the world's most renowned fan of building walls, but there's at least one wall he loathes: the wall of separation between church and state. From the Muslim ban to his so-called "religious freedom" executive order, Trump and his theocratic supporters have pushed laws and policies aimed at demolishing the First Amendment's protections against government promotion of religion and favoritism of particular faiths. And now, he's targeting church-state separation in our public schools.
After Fox News aired a segment on "[b]ringing the Bible back to the classroom" on Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, "Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!"
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools.
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination. More often than not, public school Bible classes resemble Sunday school lessons and violate students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
For example, an ACLU investigation last year of elective Bible classes in Kentucky public schools uncovered course materials instructing students to "[d]o your best to build close relationships with other Christians, so that you may help one another through tough times," and asking them, "What are some promises in the Bible that God gives everyone who believes in him?" In the same school district, students watched devotional and proselytizing films, such as "God's Not Dead 2" and "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" as part of the curriculum. And in other school districts, class assignments included memorizing and reciting Bible verses.
Rigorous academic study it's not.
As our Kentucky investigation made clear, courses focusing on one faith or religious text create conditions ripe for proselytizing and official promotion of religious beliefs. No matter what President Trump says, students are the ones who pay the price. That's why many courts have ruled that such classes, as implemented, violate the Constitution.
We've successfully challenged Bible courses in court before. We won't hesitate to do it again if public schools cross the line.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Trump may be the world's most renowned fan of building walls, but there's at least one wall he loathes: the wall of separation between church and state. From the Muslim ban to his so-called "religious freedom" executive order, Trump and his theocratic supporters have pushed laws and policies aimed at demolishing the First Amendment's protections against government promotion of religion and favoritism of particular faiths. And now, he's targeting church-state separation in our public schools.
After Fox News aired a segment on "[b]ringing the Bible back to the classroom" on Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, "Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!"
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools.
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination. More often than not, public school Bible classes resemble Sunday school lessons and violate students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
For example, an ACLU investigation last year of elective Bible classes in Kentucky public schools uncovered course materials instructing students to "[d]o your best to build close relationships with other Christians, so that you may help one another through tough times," and asking them, "What are some promises in the Bible that God gives everyone who believes in him?" In the same school district, students watched devotional and proselytizing films, such as "God's Not Dead 2" and "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" as part of the curriculum. And in other school districts, class assignments included memorizing and reciting Bible verses.
Rigorous academic study it's not.
As our Kentucky investigation made clear, courses focusing on one faith or religious text create conditions ripe for proselytizing and official promotion of religious beliefs. No matter what President Trump says, students are the ones who pay the price. That's why many courts have ruled that such classes, as implemented, violate the Constitution.
We've successfully challenged Bible courses in court before. We won't hesitate to do it again if public schools cross the line.
President Trump may be the world's most renowned fan of building walls, but there's at least one wall he loathes: the wall of separation between church and state. From the Muslim ban to his so-called "religious freedom" executive order, Trump and his theocratic supporters have pushed laws and policies aimed at demolishing the First Amendment's protections against government promotion of religion and favoritism of particular faiths. And now, he's targeting church-state separation in our public schools.
After Fox News aired a segment on "[b]ringing the Bible back to the classroom" on Monday morning, President Trump tweeted, "Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!"
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools.
But there's nothing "great" about legislation proposing Bible-study classes in our public schools. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination. More often than not, public school Bible classes resemble Sunday school lessons and violate students' and parents' First Amendment rights.
For example, an ACLU investigation last year of elective Bible classes in Kentucky public schools uncovered course materials instructing students to "[d]o your best to build close relationships with other Christians, so that you may help one another through tough times," and asking them, "What are some promises in the Bible that God gives everyone who believes in him?" In the same school district, students watched devotional and proselytizing films, such as "God's Not Dead 2" and "The Five People You Meet in Heaven" as part of the curriculum. And in other school districts, class assignments included memorizing and reciting Bible verses.
Rigorous academic study it's not.
As our Kentucky investigation made clear, courses focusing on one faith or religious text create conditions ripe for proselytizing and official promotion of religious beliefs. No matter what President Trump says, students are the ones who pay the price. That's why many courts have ruled that such classes, as implemented, violate the Constitution.
We've successfully challenged Bible courses in court before. We won't hesitate to do it again if public schools cross the line.