

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Donald Trump's first budget proposed zeroing out money for capital improvements and cutting money for public housing operations by 45%. (Photo: Harry Benson/Getty Images)
The federal housing official responsible for the New York City region says she plans to move into public housing to spotlight inhumane conditions, but if she really wanted to spotlight inhumanity in housing, she'd move big money out of precious city housing stock.
Longtime Trump aid Lynne Patton told the press recently that she intends to move out of Trump Plaza, where she lives, and into public housing to cast a spotlight on the inhumane conditions in which some city residents live.
Vilifying public agencies is part of the pro-privatization agenda. So is underfunding them.
Her target is NYCHA. The New York City Housing Authority is one of the nation's biggest, and in many ways, the program's flagship, so it's no surprise it comes in for lots of grief. Some of it is well deserved. Federal investigators have found mold and rodents and lead in New York public housing. Over 25,000 residents spent a very frigid Thanksgiving weekend without heat and hot water, some going for water from a hydrant in the street.
But Patton moving in for a month on her $161,000 salary won't shed a spotlight on inhumanity as much as on herself and on the Trump agenda, which, like that of most Republicans, is about promoting the private at the expense of the public. Which is ironic given that Tump's money--which is to say his father's money--came to him from a public housing grant. Vilifying public agencies is part of the pro-privatization agenda. So is underfunding them. Donald Trump's first budget proposed zeroing out money for capital improvements and cutting money for public housing operations by 45%.
If we really want to spotlight inhumanity in housing, how about we let Patton move out and let some poor residents move in.
So it's no surprise that Trump's HUD would be grandstanding about local public mismanagement. But progressives are calling for more--not less--local control and decision-making as a way to address NYCHA's woes, not selling their properties off to owners who are even less accountable and even more remote.
So I have a better idea. If we really want to spotlight inhumanity in housing, how about we let Patton move out and let some poor residents move in. Not only to Trump Plaza to see how HUD officials live, but into the 75,000 apartments that are sitting empty, according to a recent city census--many of them just real estate investments for the rich and super rich. There are two available directly across from me in downtown Manhattan. They've been sitting there dark for all but a night or two all year. Empty and costly, around the clock.
You want to spotlight inhumanity in housing? How about housing like that, that's just for money, not for people. Let's spotlight that, and then consider something like a pied-a-terre tax so that wealthy people or investors would have a reason to share or get out.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The federal housing official responsible for the New York City region says she plans to move into public housing to spotlight inhumane conditions, but if she really wanted to spotlight inhumanity in housing, she'd move big money out of precious city housing stock.
Longtime Trump aid Lynne Patton told the press recently that she intends to move out of Trump Plaza, where she lives, and into public housing to cast a spotlight on the inhumane conditions in which some city residents live.
Vilifying public agencies is part of the pro-privatization agenda. So is underfunding them.
Her target is NYCHA. The New York City Housing Authority is one of the nation's biggest, and in many ways, the program's flagship, so it's no surprise it comes in for lots of grief. Some of it is well deserved. Federal investigators have found mold and rodents and lead in New York public housing. Over 25,000 residents spent a very frigid Thanksgiving weekend without heat and hot water, some going for water from a hydrant in the street.
But Patton moving in for a month on her $161,000 salary won't shed a spotlight on inhumanity as much as on herself and on the Trump agenda, which, like that of most Republicans, is about promoting the private at the expense of the public. Which is ironic given that Tump's money--which is to say his father's money--came to him from a public housing grant. Vilifying public agencies is part of the pro-privatization agenda. So is underfunding them. Donald Trump's first budget proposed zeroing out money for capital improvements and cutting money for public housing operations by 45%.
If we really want to spotlight inhumanity in housing, how about we let Patton move out and let some poor residents move in.
So it's no surprise that Trump's HUD would be grandstanding about local public mismanagement. But progressives are calling for more--not less--local control and decision-making as a way to address NYCHA's woes, not selling their properties off to owners who are even less accountable and even more remote.
So I have a better idea. If we really want to spotlight inhumanity in housing, how about we let Patton move out and let some poor residents move in. Not only to Trump Plaza to see how HUD officials live, but into the 75,000 apartments that are sitting empty, according to a recent city census--many of them just real estate investments for the rich and super rich. There are two available directly across from me in downtown Manhattan. They've been sitting there dark for all but a night or two all year. Empty and costly, around the clock.
You want to spotlight inhumanity in housing? How about housing like that, that's just for money, not for people. Let's spotlight that, and then consider something like a pied-a-terre tax so that wealthy people or investors would have a reason to share or get out.
The federal housing official responsible for the New York City region says she plans to move into public housing to spotlight inhumane conditions, but if she really wanted to spotlight inhumanity in housing, she'd move big money out of precious city housing stock.
Longtime Trump aid Lynne Patton told the press recently that she intends to move out of Trump Plaza, where she lives, and into public housing to cast a spotlight on the inhumane conditions in which some city residents live.
Vilifying public agencies is part of the pro-privatization agenda. So is underfunding them.
Her target is NYCHA. The New York City Housing Authority is one of the nation's biggest, and in many ways, the program's flagship, so it's no surprise it comes in for lots of grief. Some of it is well deserved. Federal investigators have found mold and rodents and lead in New York public housing. Over 25,000 residents spent a very frigid Thanksgiving weekend without heat and hot water, some going for water from a hydrant in the street.
But Patton moving in for a month on her $161,000 salary won't shed a spotlight on inhumanity as much as on herself and on the Trump agenda, which, like that of most Republicans, is about promoting the private at the expense of the public. Which is ironic given that Tump's money--which is to say his father's money--came to him from a public housing grant. Vilifying public agencies is part of the pro-privatization agenda. So is underfunding them. Donald Trump's first budget proposed zeroing out money for capital improvements and cutting money for public housing operations by 45%.
If we really want to spotlight inhumanity in housing, how about we let Patton move out and let some poor residents move in.
So it's no surprise that Trump's HUD would be grandstanding about local public mismanagement. But progressives are calling for more--not less--local control and decision-making as a way to address NYCHA's woes, not selling their properties off to owners who are even less accountable and even more remote.
So I have a better idea. If we really want to spotlight inhumanity in housing, how about we let Patton move out and let some poor residents move in. Not only to Trump Plaza to see how HUD officials live, but into the 75,000 apartments that are sitting empty, according to a recent city census--many of them just real estate investments for the rich and super rich. There are two available directly across from me in downtown Manhattan. They've been sitting there dark for all but a night or two all year. Empty and costly, around the clock.
You want to spotlight inhumanity in housing? How about housing like that, that's just for money, not for people. Let's spotlight that, and then consider something like a pied-a-terre tax so that wealthy people or investors would have a reason to share or get out.