

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Medicare for All is the cheapest and best direction for the country. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
In the midterm elections, most Democrats who were elected or reelected to the House supported Medicare for All.
As Trump and Republicans in Congress try to undermine the Affordable Care Act and raise the costs of health care, the American people continue to push back.
Over 70% of Americans-and even 52% of Republicans-now support Medicare for All, a single-payer plan that builds on Medicare and would cover everyone at far lower cost than the current system.
Here are the facts:
Medicare for All is the cheapest and best direction for the country. Private for-profit insurers spend a fortune trying to attract healthy people while avoiding sick people, filling out paperwork from hospitals and providers, paying top executives, and rewarding shareholders.
And for-profit insurers are trying to merge like mad, in order to make even more money. This is why private for-profit health insurance is becoming so expensive, and why almost every other advanced nation-including our neighbor to the north-has adopted a single-payer system at less cost per person and with better health outcomes.
Administering Medicare is only 1.1 percent of its total costs; the rest goes directly into care. Even including Medicare Advantage, which involves private plans, total administrative costs are just 7 percent.
But private insurers spend about 12 percent of total costs on administration. Or put another way, Medicare's 2016 administrative costs came to about $156 per person compared to over $594 per person with private insurance.
Medicare saves so much money for three simple reasons:
First, it has economies of scale. The more enrollees, the lower the cost per enrollee. Medicare for All would have even larger economies of scale, presumably lowering the per-person costs further.
Second, Medicare spends almost nothing on marketing and advertising, while for-profit insurers spend a fortune.
Third, Medicare doesn't have to earn profits.
Most Americans support expanding access to quality, affordable care through Medicare for All. Yet Trump and the Republicans continue to try to gut the Affordable Care Act and take away care from tens of millions.
The American public has a real choice here: expensive health care for the few or quality, affordable health care for the many. It's time for Medicare for All.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In the midterm elections, most Democrats who were elected or reelected to the House supported Medicare for All.
As Trump and Republicans in Congress try to undermine the Affordable Care Act and raise the costs of health care, the American people continue to push back.
Over 70% of Americans-and even 52% of Republicans-now support Medicare for All, a single-payer plan that builds on Medicare and would cover everyone at far lower cost than the current system.
Here are the facts:
Medicare for All is the cheapest and best direction for the country. Private for-profit insurers spend a fortune trying to attract healthy people while avoiding sick people, filling out paperwork from hospitals and providers, paying top executives, and rewarding shareholders.
And for-profit insurers are trying to merge like mad, in order to make even more money. This is why private for-profit health insurance is becoming so expensive, and why almost every other advanced nation-including our neighbor to the north-has adopted a single-payer system at less cost per person and with better health outcomes.
Administering Medicare is only 1.1 percent of its total costs; the rest goes directly into care. Even including Medicare Advantage, which involves private plans, total administrative costs are just 7 percent.
But private insurers spend about 12 percent of total costs on administration. Or put another way, Medicare's 2016 administrative costs came to about $156 per person compared to over $594 per person with private insurance.
Medicare saves so much money for three simple reasons:
First, it has economies of scale. The more enrollees, the lower the cost per enrollee. Medicare for All would have even larger economies of scale, presumably lowering the per-person costs further.
Second, Medicare spends almost nothing on marketing and advertising, while for-profit insurers spend a fortune.
Third, Medicare doesn't have to earn profits.
Most Americans support expanding access to quality, affordable care through Medicare for All. Yet Trump and the Republicans continue to try to gut the Affordable Care Act and take away care from tens of millions.
The American public has a real choice here: expensive health care for the few or quality, affordable health care for the many. It's time for Medicare for All.
In the midterm elections, most Democrats who were elected or reelected to the House supported Medicare for All.
As Trump and Republicans in Congress try to undermine the Affordable Care Act and raise the costs of health care, the American people continue to push back.
Over 70% of Americans-and even 52% of Republicans-now support Medicare for All, a single-payer plan that builds on Medicare and would cover everyone at far lower cost than the current system.
Here are the facts:
Medicare for All is the cheapest and best direction for the country. Private for-profit insurers spend a fortune trying to attract healthy people while avoiding sick people, filling out paperwork from hospitals and providers, paying top executives, and rewarding shareholders.
And for-profit insurers are trying to merge like mad, in order to make even more money. This is why private for-profit health insurance is becoming so expensive, and why almost every other advanced nation-including our neighbor to the north-has adopted a single-payer system at less cost per person and with better health outcomes.
Administering Medicare is only 1.1 percent of its total costs; the rest goes directly into care. Even including Medicare Advantage, which involves private plans, total administrative costs are just 7 percent.
But private insurers spend about 12 percent of total costs on administration. Or put another way, Medicare's 2016 administrative costs came to about $156 per person compared to over $594 per person with private insurance.
Medicare saves so much money for three simple reasons:
First, it has economies of scale. The more enrollees, the lower the cost per enrollee. Medicare for All would have even larger economies of scale, presumably lowering the per-person costs further.
Second, Medicare spends almost nothing on marketing and advertising, while for-profit insurers spend a fortune.
Third, Medicare doesn't have to earn profits.
Most Americans support expanding access to quality, affordable care through Medicare for All. Yet Trump and the Republicans continue to try to gut the Affordable Care Act and take away care from tens of millions.
The American public has a real choice here: expensive health care for the few or quality, affordable health care for the many. It's time for Medicare for All.