

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"Within that top 20 percent, well over half the benefits have gone to the top 5 percent, and over half those top 5 percent benefits have gone to the top 1 percent." (Photo: Fight Back! News/Kim DeFranco)
The United States ended the 20th century on a roll -- for the rich. Between 1973 and 2000, the nation's most prosperous 1 percent tripled their incomes, after taking inflation into account.
The even more prosperous top tenth of that 1 percent did quite a bit better. Their incomes more than quintupled between 1973 and 2000, rising an amazing 414.6 percent.
And what about Americans of less exalted means, those stuck in the nation's bottom 90 percent? Between 1973 and 2000, their incomes rose all of . . . 2.6 percent.
Something, in other words, went horribly wrong over the last quarter of the 20th century. And what has happened so far in century 21? Our decision makers in Washington have done their best to make things even worse.
The top 1 percent have grabbed 22 percent of the total savings from this century's major tax bills. The bottom 60 percent have taken in just 19 percent of the total.
How much worse? We now have a new report from the Washington, D.C.-based Institute on Taxation and Economic and Policy that offers a distressing new answer.
The Institute's researchers looked at all the major tax bills that members of Congress have passed -- and Presidents have signed into law -- since the start of our 21st century, every piece of legislation right up through the GOP tax cut signed into law this past December.
The researchers then calculated what households have paid in taxes under the new tax laws, for each year since 2000, and what they would have paid if Congress this century had made no changes to the nation's tax code.
Taxpayers would have paid, the researchers found, $5.1 trillion more in taxes had America's tax laws not changed. Who benefited from these trillions in tax savings?
Lawmakers have been assuring us, all along the way, that we would all benefit.
"This is about helping hard-working taxpayers across the board," promised Rep. Erik Paulsen of Minnesota last November as Republicans on the House Ways and means Committee began pushing the most recent of this century's tax cuts into law.
But some Americans have benefited quite a bit more than others -- and many others have barely seen any benefit at all.
All told, only 3 percent of this century's tax cut savings have gone to America's poorest 20 percent. Taxpayers at the other end of America's income spectrum, those fortunate souls in the top 20 percent, have grabbed 65 percent of those savings, nearly two-thirds of the total.
Within that top 20 percent, well over half the benefits have gone to the top 5 percent, and over half those top 5 percent benefits have gone to the top 1 percent.
Steve Wamhoff, one of the Institute on Taxation and Economic and Policy researchers, has another interesting frame on the numbers.
"If you look at the richest 1 percent," he notes, "they're getting more than the bottom 60 percent of Americans."
The exact numbers: The top 1 percent have grabbed 22 percent of the total savings from this century's major tax bills. The bottom 60 percent have taken in just 19 percent of the total.
This century's tax cuts have clearly not been about "helping hard-working taxpayers across the board." They've been about tossing crumbs to people working two and three jobs to make ends meet and rewarding the already rich -- with new yachts. Literally.
This past November, on the same day the full U.S. House of Representatives gave a green light to the latest GOP tax cut, the Florida mega-millionaire who chairs the House subcommittee in charge of writing new tax policies -- Rep. Vern Buchanan -- spent somewhere over $3.25 million buying a new yacht.
Buchanan, the eighth-richest lawmaker in Congress, had good reason to celebrate. The tax cut signed into law this past December will save him as much as $2.1 million a year in taxes.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The United States ended the 20th century on a roll -- for the rich. Between 1973 and 2000, the nation's most prosperous 1 percent tripled their incomes, after taking inflation into account.
The even more prosperous top tenth of that 1 percent did quite a bit better. Their incomes more than quintupled between 1973 and 2000, rising an amazing 414.6 percent.
And what about Americans of less exalted means, those stuck in the nation's bottom 90 percent? Between 1973 and 2000, their incomes rose all of . . . 2.6 percent.
Something, in other words, went horribly wrong over the last quarter of the 20th century. And what has happened so far in century 21? Our decision makers in Washington have done their best to make things even worse.
The top 1 percent have grabbed 22 percent of the total savings from this century's major tax bills. The bottom 60 percent have taken in just 19 percent of the total.
How much worse? We now have a new report from the Washington, D.C.-based Institute on Taxation and Economic and Policy that offers a distressing new answer.
The Institute's researchers looked at all the major tax bills that members of Congress have passed -- and Presidents have signed into law -- since the start of our 21st century, every piece of legislation right up through the GOP tax cut signed into law this past December.
The researchers then calculated what households have paid in taxes under the new tax laws, for each year since 2000, and what they would have paid if Congress this century had made no changes to the nation's tax code.
Taxpayers would have paid, the researchers found, $5.1 trillion more in taxes had America's tax laws not changed. Who benefited from these trillions in tax savings?
Lawmakers have been assuring us, all along the way, that we would all benefit.
"This is about helping hard-working taxpayers across the board," promised Rep. Erik Paulsen of Minnesota last November as Republicans on the House Ways and means Committee began pushing the most recent of this century's tax cuts into law.
But some Americans have benefited quite a bit more than others -- and many others have barely seen any benefit at all.
All told, only 3 percent of this century's tax cut savings have gone to America's poorest 20 percent. Taxpayers at the other end of America's income spectrum, those fortunate souls in the top 20 percent, have grabbed 65 percent of those savings, nearly two-thirds of the total.
Within that top 20 percent, well over half the benefits have gone to the top 5 percent, and over half those top 5 percent benefits have gone to the top 1 percent.
Steve Wamhoff, one of the Institute on Taxation and Economic and Policy researchers, has another interesting frame on the numbers.
"If you look at the richest 1 percent," he notes, "they're getting more than the bottom 60 percent of Americans."
The exact numbers: The top 1 percent have grabbed 22 percent of the total savings from this century's major tax bills. The bottom 60 percent have taken in just 19 percent of the total.
This century's tax cuts have clearly not been about "helping hard-working taxpayers across the board." They've been about tossing crumbs to people working two and three jobs to make ends meet and rewarding the already rich -- with new yachts. Literally.
This past November, on the same day the full U.S. House of Representatives gave a green light to the latest GOP tax cut, the Florida mega-millionaire who chairs the House subcommittee in charge of writing new tax policies -- Rep. Vern Buchanan -- spent somewhere over $3.25 million buying a new yacht.
Buchanan, the eighth-richest lawmaker in Congress, had good reason to celebrate. The tax cut signed into law this past December will save him as much as $2.1 million a year in taxes.
The United States ended the 20th century on a roll -- for the rich. Between 1973 and 2000, the nation's most prosperous 1 percent tripled their incomes, after taking inflation into account.
The even more prosperous top tenth of that 1 percent did quite a bit better. Their incomes more than quintupled between 1973 and 2000, rising an amazing 414.6 percent.
And what about Americans of less exalted means, those stuck in the nation's bottom 90 percent? Between 1973 and 2000, their incomes rose all of . . . 2.6 percent.
Something, in other words, went horribly wrong over the last quarter of the 20th century. And what has happened so far in century 21? Our decision makers in Washington have done their best to make things even worse.
The top 1 percent have grabbed 22 percent of the total savings from this century's major tax bills. The bottom 60 percent have taken in just 19 percent of the total.
How much worse? We now have a new report from the Washington, D.C.-based Institute on Taxation and Economic and Policy that offers a distressing new answer.
The Institute's researchers looked at all the major tax bills that members of Congress have passed -- and Presidents have signed into law -- since the start of our 21st century, every piece of legislation right up through the GOP tax cut signed into law this past December.
The researchers then calculated what households have paid in taxes under the new tax laws, for each year since 2000, and what they would have paid if Congress this century had made no changes to the nation's tax code.
Taxpayers would have paid, the researchers found, $5.1 trillion more in taxes had America's tax laws not changed. Who benefited from these trillions in tax savings?
Lawmakers have been assuring us, all along the way, that we would all benefit.
"This is about helping hard-working taxpayers across the board," promised Rep. Erik Paulsen of Minnesota last November as Republicans on the House Ways and means Committee began pushing the most recent of this century's tax cuts into law.
But some Americans have benefited quite a bit more than others -- and many others have barely seen any benefit at all.
All told, only 3 percent of this century's tax cut savings have gone to America's poorest 20 percent. Taxpayers at the other end of America's income spectrum, those fortunate souls in the top 20 percent, have grabbed 65 percent of those savings, nearly two-thirds of the total.
Within that top 20 percent, well over half the benefits have gone to the top 5 percent, and over half those top 5 percent benefits have gone to the top 1 percent.
Steve Wamhoff, one of the Institute on Taxation and Economic and Policy researchers, has another interesting frame on the numbers.
"If you look at the richest 1 percent," he notes, "they're getting more than the bottom 60 percent of Americans."
The exact numbers: The top 1 percent have grabbed 22 percent of the total savings from this century's major tax bills. The bottom 60 percent have taken in just 19 percent of the total.
This century's tax cuts have clearly not been about "helping hard-working taxpayers across the board." They've been about tossing crumbs to people working two and three jobs to make ends meet and rewarding the already rich -- with new yachts. Literally.
This past November, on the same day the full U.S. House of Representatives gave a green light to the latest GOP tax cut, the Florida mega-millionaire who chairs the House subcommittee in charge of writing new tax policies -- Rep. Vern Buchanan -- spent somewhere over $3.25 million buying a new yacht.
Buchanan, the eighth-richest lawmaker in Congress, had good reason to celebrate. The tax cut signed into law this past December will save him as much as $2.1 million a year in taxes.